Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Pathways in surgery—should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article

  • Overview
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

In modern health care systems, care providers face ever new challenges with regard to quality and cost of care, as well as to satisfaction and training of staff. Due to the intensiveness of the subject, these challenges are particularly pronounced in surgery. Clinical Pathways, i.e. detailed care plans defining the desired measures to be performed for each treatment period, are thought to be a tool to improve care in surgery with regard to these issues.

Methods

We performed a literature review to identify studies reporting effects of the implementation of Clinical Pathways into clinical care for the most common surgical interventions. We subdivided findings into Clinical Pathways’ effects on economic aspects, quality of care, treatment transparency, staff satisfaction and staff training.

Results

Our search identified 30 studies. Twenty four studies were trials with a before–after design. Four trials had only an intervention group, one trial was a non-randomised controlled trial and one was a randomised controlled trial. Study sizes ranged from six to 1,200 patients. The mean number of patients was 119 in the treatment group and 120 in the comparison group (where existent). Clinical Pathway implementation in surgery has manifold advantages. They improve objective and subjective quality of care, decrease hospitals’ costs, increase staff satisfaction and are valuable tools for training. Their effect seems to be most pronounced for high-volume or particularly complex treatments.

Conclusion

There is substantial evidence that Clinical Pathways lead to various improvements in clinical care in surgery. Their widespread use should therefore be encouraged. However, more research encompassing all facets of Clinical Pathway usage and implying sound methods is strongly required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canales MG, Macario A, Krummel T (2001) The surgical suite meets the new health economy. J Am Coll Surg 192(6):768–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campion FX, Rosenblatt MS (1996) Quality assurance and medical outcomes in the era of cost containment. Surg Clin North Am 76(1):139–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spear SJ (2006) To save lives. Harvard Bus Manag (1):48–63

  4. Stirrat GM (2004) Ethics and evidence based surgery. J Med Ethics 30(2):160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauerland S, Bouillon B, Neugebauer E (2003) The practice of evidence-based medicine in surgery—evidence and experience. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 97(4–5):271–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beger HG, Rau BM (2006) Randomized controlled clinical trials—support but not substitute of decision-making in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391(4):301–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, Porteous M (1998) Integrated care pathways. BMJ 316(7125):133–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Renholm M, Leino-Kilpi H, Suominen T (2002) Critical pathways. A systematic review. J Nurs Adm 32(4):196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Currie L, Harvey G (1998) Care pathways development and implementation. Nurs Stand 12(30):35–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibarra V, Titler MG, Reiter RC (1996) Issues in the development and implementation of clinical pathways. AACN Clin Issues 7(3):436–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW (2003) The ethics of clinical pathways and cost control. J Vasc Surg 37(6):1341–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roeder N, Kuttner T (2006) Clinical pathways in view of cost effects in the DRG system. Internist (Berl) 47(7):684–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner K, Allhusen J, Kamm J, Tobin J (1997) Determining the cost of care through clinical pathways. Nurs Econ 15(4):213–217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Melbert RB, Kimmins MH, Isler JT, Billingham RP, Lawton D, Salvadalena G et al (2002) Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6(5):745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pritts TA, Nussbaum MS, Flesch LV, Fegelman EJ, Parikh AA, Fischer JE (1999) Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection. Ann Surg 230(5):728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133(3):277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter GA, Pisters PW, Mansyur C, Bisanz A, Reyna K, Stanford P et al (2000) Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 7(7):484–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitt HA, Murray KP, Bowman HM, Coleman J, Gordon TA, Yeo CJ et al (1999) Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery. Surgery 126(4):751–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zehr KJ, Dawson PB, Yang SC, Heitmiller RF (1998) Standardized clinical care pathways for major thoracic cases reduce hospital costs. Ann Thorac Surg 66(3):914–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Joh HJ, Moon IS, Park HR, Kim NC, Yang S (2003) The effects of the critical pathway for inguinal hernia repair. Yonsei Med J 44(1):81–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Warner BW, Kulick RM, Stoops MM, Mehta S, Stephan M, Kotagal UR (1998) An evidenced-based clinical pathway for acute appendicitis decreases hospital duration and cost. J Pediatr Surg 33(9):1371–1375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Takegami K, Kawaguchi Y, Nakayama H, Kubota Y, Nagawa H (2003) Impact of a clinical pathway and standardization of treatment for acute appendicitis. Surg Today 33(5):336–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Firilas AM, Higginbotham PH, Johnson DD, Jackson RJ, Wagner CW, Smith SD (1999) A new economic benchmark for surgical treatment of appendicitis. Am Surg 65(8):769–773

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramanujam LN, Cheah WK (2005) Improvements in health care for patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 28(4):266–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Markey DW, McGowan J, Hanks JB (2000) The effect of clinical pathway implementation on total hospital costs for thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy patients. Am Surg 66(6):533–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, Onishi H, Yamaue H (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(11):1594–1597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rouse AD, Tripp BL, Shipley S, Pories W, Cunningham P, MacDonald K Jr (1998) Meeting the challenge of managed care through clinical pathways for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 8(5):530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kawachi S, Shimazu M, Hoshino K, Tanabe M, Fuchimoto Y, Obara H et al (2006) Effectiveness of a clinical pathway for hepatectomy of live donors in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 6(s2):702–703

    Google Scholar 

  29. Renal transplantation path saves $34K per patient. Hosp Case Manag 7(1):5–8

  30. Collier PE (1997) Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce cosat. J Vasc Surg 26(2):179–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Calligaro KD, Dougherty MJ, Raviola CA, Musser DJ, DeLaurentis DA (1995) Impact of clinical pathways on hospital costs and early outcome after major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 22(6):649–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Velasco FT, Ko W, Rosengart T, Altorki N, Lang S, Gold JP et al (1996) Cost containment in cardiac surgery: results with a critical pathway for coronary bypass surgery at the New York hospital–Cornell Medical Center. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc 1(1):21–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacavone JB, Daniels RD, Tyner I (1999) CNS facilitation of a cardiac surgery clinical pathway program. Clin Nurse Spec 13(3):126–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maruyama R, Miyake T, Kojo M, Aoki Y, Suemitsu R, Okamoto T et al (2006) Establishment of a clinical pathway as an effective tool to reduce hospitalization and charges after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54(9):387–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim S, Losina E, Solomon DH, Wright J, Katz JN (2003) Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty 18(1):69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Caplan G, Board N, Paten A, Tazelaar-Molinia J, Crowe P, Yap SJ et al (1999) Decreasing lengths of stay: the cost to the community. Aust N Z J Surg 69(6):433–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed. JAMA 260(12):1743–1748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Holtzman J, Bjerke T, Kane R (1998) The effects of clinical pathways for renal transplant on patient outcomes and length of stay. Med Care 36(6):826–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vuori H (1991) Patient satisfaction—does it matter. Qual Assur Health Care 3(3):183–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Blegen MA, Reiter RC, Goode CJ, Murphy RR (1995) Outcomes of hospital-based managed care: a multivariate analysis of cost and quality. Obstet Gynecol 86(5):809–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Stanbridge DD, Fried GM (2006) Patient perception of a clinical pathway for laparoscopic foregut surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kawahara H, Yanagisawa S, Kashiwagi H, Hirai K, Yamazaki Y, Yanaga K (2005) Implementation of a clinical pathway for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int Surg 90(3):144–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Soria V, Pellicer E, Flores B, Carrasco M, Candel MF, Aguayo JL (2005) Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71(1):40–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Barker SG, Sachs R, Louden C, Linnard D, Abu-Own A, Buckland J et al (1999) Integrated care pathways for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 18(3):207–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Parker C (1999) Patient pathways as a tool for empowering patients. Nurs Case Manag 4(2):77–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dealey C (2005) The factors that influence patients’ choice of hospital and treatment. Br J Nurs 14(10):576–579

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson JG, Rainey MR, Eysenbach G (2003) The impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician–patient relationship. J Med Syst 27(1):67–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Elpern EH, Silver MR (2006) Improving outcomes: focus on workplace issues. Curr Opin Crit Care 12(5):395–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Faragher EB, Cass M, Cooper CL (2005) The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 62(2):105–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Goode CJ (1995) Impact of a CareMap and case management on patient satisfaction and staff satisfaction, collaboration, and autonomy. Nurs Econ 13(6):337–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Holzbeierlein JM, Smith JA (2000) Radical prostatectomy and collaborative care pathways. Semin Urol Oncol 18(1):60–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. de Luc K (2000) Care pathways: an evaluation of their effectiveness. J Adv Nurs 32(2):485–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Furaker C, Hellstrom-Muhli U, Walldal E (2004) Quality of care in relation to a critical pathway from the staff's perspective. J Nurs Manag 12(5):309–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kinsman L, James E, Ham J (2004) An interdisciplinary, evidence-based process of clinical pathway implementation increases pathway usage. Lippincotts Case Manag 9(4):184–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pearson SD, Goulart-Fisher D, Lee TH (1995) Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: problems and potential. Ann Intern Med 123(12):941–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF (2005) Teaching evidence-based medicine: should we be teaching information management instead. Acad Med 80(7):685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Napolitano LM (2005) Standardization of perioperative management: clinical pathways. Surg Clin North Am 85(6):1321–1327 xiii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hart R, Musfeldt C (1992) MD-directed critical pathways: it's time. Hospitals 66(23):56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ramos MC, Ratliff C (1997) The development and implementation of an integrated multidisciplinary clinical pathway. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 24(2):66–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR (1991) Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 337(8746):867–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Low DE, Kunz S, Schembre D, Otero H, Malpass T, Hsi A et al (2007) Esophagectomy- it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11(11):1395–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3, 68135, , Mannheim, Germany

    Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Eric Rössner, Jens Jakob, Stefan Post, Peter Hohenberger & Matthias Schwarzbach

Authors
  1. Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Rössner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jens Jakob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Hohenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Schwarzbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Ronellenfitsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronellenfitsch, U., Rössner, E., Jakob, J. et al. Clinical Pathways in surgery—should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393, 449–457 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0303-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0303-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation