Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgery is the last resort for patients suffering from severe fecal incontinence. The armamentarium of surgical options for this condition has increased impressively during the last decade. Nevertheless, this fact seems to make neither patients nor surgeons feel more comfortable. Treatment of fecal incontinence still remains a challenge to modern medicine due to many specific sides of this problem.

Aims

This article gives an up-to-date overview of existing operative treatment options.

Methods

An unbiased review of relevant literature was performed to assess the role of all methods of surgical treatment for fecal incontinence available nowadays.

Results

Recent studies have shown poor late results after primary sphincter repair and low predictive value for most preoperative diagnostic tests. New surgical options such as artificial devices and electrically stimulated muscle transpositions are doomed by low success rates and unacceptably frequent complications. That is why current attention has focused on non- or minimally invasive therapies such as sacral nerve stimulation and temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal. However, all these innovative techniques remain experimental till enough high-evidence data are gathered for their objective evaluation.

Conclusion

Careful and detailed preoperative assessment to exactly determine the etiology of incontinence and individual approach remain the cornerstones of surgical treatment of fecal incontinence nowadays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton NJ (2001) Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:131–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson RL (2004) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C et al (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50:480–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Madoff RD, Parker S, Varma MG, Lowry A (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364:621–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao SSC (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 99(8):1585–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90:1333–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1591–1605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien PE, Skinner S (2000) Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1213–1216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coller JA (1987) Clinical application of anorectal manometry. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 16:17–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sentovich SM, Wong WD, Blatchford GS (1998) Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1000–1004

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Norton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA (2003) Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 125:1320–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL (1999) Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:318–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baxter NN, Bravo Guttierez A, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Madoff RD (2003) Long-term results of sphincteroplasty for acquired fecal incontinence (abstr). Dis Colon Rectum 46:A21–A22

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gutierrez AB, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN (2004) Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 47:727–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Madoff RD (2004) Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S48–S54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parks AG (1975) Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deen KI, Oya M, Ortiz J, Keighley MB (1993) Randomized trial comparing three forms of pelvic floor repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 80:794–798

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Korsgen S, Deen KI, Keighley MR (1997) Long-term results of total pelvic floor repair for postobstetric fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 40:835–839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT (1952) Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg 135:853–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338:1163–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD et al (1991) Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 338:1166–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rongen MJGM, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, Baeten CGMI (2003) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:716–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG, LaFontaine LJ, Cavina E, Devesa M, Rouanet P, Christiansen J, Faucheron JL, Isbister W, Kohler L, Guelinckx PJ, Pahlman L (1999) Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 116:549–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koch SM, Uludag O, Rongen M, Baeten CG, van Gemert W (2004) Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1711–1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Penninckx F (2004) Belgian experience with dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:872–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MSAC (2003) Placement of artificial bowel sphincters in the management of faecal incontinence. Assessment report. Medical Services Advisory Committee, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  30. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M (1987) Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 2(8553):244–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P (2003) Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence. Ann Surg 237(1):52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Devesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL, Halawa KS, Larranaga I, Svidler L, Abraira V, Muriel A (2002) Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1154–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Parker SC, Spencer MP, Madoff RD, Jensen LL, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA (2003) Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 46:722–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE (2004) Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:665–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Finlay IG, Richardson W, Hajivassiliou CA (2004) Outcome after implantation of a novel prosthetic anal sphincter in humans. Br J Surg 91:1485–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Douglas JM, Smith LE (2001) Recent concepts in fecal incontinence. Curr Women’s Health Rep 1:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Arduini A, van den Hombergh U (2003) New percutaneous technique of sacral nerve stimulation has high initial success rate: preliminary results. Eur Urol 43:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ganio E, Realis A, Clerico G, Trompetto M (2001) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:619–628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W (2004) Innovations in fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1720–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Takahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Belmonte C, Barreto C, Velasco L (2003) Extended two-year results of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence (the Secca procedure). Dis Colon Rectum 46:711–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Efron JE, Corman ML, Fleshman J, Barnett J, Nagle D, Birnbaum E, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Sligh S, Rabine J, Wexner SD (2003) Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1606–1618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tuteja AK, Rao SSC (2004) Review article: recent trends in diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19:829–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Davis K, Kumar D, Poloniecki J (2003) Preliminary evaluation of an injectable anal sphincter bulking agent (Durasphere) in the management of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J (2004) Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1982–1989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shafik A (1991) Puborectoplasty: new technique for the repair of fecal incontinence. Dig Surg 8:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sato T, Konishi F, Kanazawa K (2000) End-to-side pudendal nerve anastomosis for the creation of a new reinforcing anal sphincter in dogs. Surgery 127:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Congilosi SM, Johnson DRE, Medot M et al (1997) Experimental model of pudendal nerve innervation of a skeletal muscle neosphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 84:1269–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schrag HJ, Padilla FF, Goldschmidtboing F, Doll A, Woias P, Hopt UT (2004) German Artificial Sphincter System: first report of a novel and highly integrated sphincter prosthesis for therapy of major fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2215–2218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bardoel JW, Stadelmann WK, Perez-Abadia GA (2001) Dynamic rectus abdominis muscle sphincter for stoma continence: an acute functional study in a dog model. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:478–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Altomare DF, Binda GA, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Rinaldi M, Melega E (2004) Disappointing long-term results of the artificial anal sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:1352–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hill J, Hosker G, Kiff ES (2002) Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurement: what that do and do not tell us. Br J Surg 89:1268–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89

  56. Koch SMP, Baeten CMGI (2003) Sphincter replacement grafts. Chirurg 74(1):15–19 (in German)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Gudrunstrasse 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany

    Christophe Müller, Orlin Belyaev, Thomas Deska, Ansgar Chromik, Dirk Weyhe & Waldemar Uhl

Authors
  1. Christophe Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Orlin Belyaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Deska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ansgar Chromik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dirk Weyhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Waldemar Uhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waldemar Uhl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, C., Belyaev, O., Deska, T. et al. Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 544–552 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0566-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0566-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation