Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Graciloplasty in Patients Born With an Anorectal Malformation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare long-term results for patients born with an anorectal malformation and fecal incontinence treated with a dynamic graciloplasty with those for the total group of patients undergoing dynamic graciloplasty.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with fecal incontinence after surgical treatment of anorectal malformation and treated with dynamic graciloplasty were included in this study. Preoperative assessment was performed. Postoperative follow-up consisted of anorectal manometry and registration of defecation frequency, continence scores, and postponement time of defecation.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with a median age of 25.5 years were included in the study. The median follow-up was 4 years. A high anorectal malformation was present in 89.3 percent of patients. Conventional graciloplasty had been previously performed in 36 percent. All patients were incontinent for stools. Median frequency of defecation was four times/day. Median postponement time of defecation was 0 minutes. Rectoanal inhibition reflex was present in 17 percent of patients. Median preoperative sensory threshold during balloon distention was 30 ml and median maximum urge threshold was 165 ml. Satisfactory continence was reached in 35 percent of patients, however, 7.1 percent of patients gained this continence score by additional bowel irrigation. Twenty-nine percent of patients were incontinent for loose stool, 36 percent were incontinent for formed stool. Satisfactory continence was achieved in only 18 percent of patients with a high anorectal malformation, compared with 100 percent in patients with a low anorectal malformation. In the total group of patients with dynamic graciloplasty, satisfactory continence was obtained in 76 percent. The sensitivity threshold in patients with a successful dynamic graciloplasty was lower than that in patients with a failing dynamic graciloplasty (45 vs. 24 ml, P = 0,06). When we compare median preoperative rectal sensitivity threshold in our study group with that in the total patient group with dynamic graciloplasty, statistical difference was established (P = 0.008). Postponement time (0 to 20 minutes) and anal squeeze pressure (81 to 120 mmHg) increased significantly after surgery. Patients with an anorectal malformation had significantly lower resting and stimulation pressure than that of the total group of patients, but the difference between resting and stimulation pressure in both groups was not significantly different (P = 0.33). The difference between resting and stimulation pressure was not significantly different between anorectal malformation patients with a failing dynamic graciloplasty and patients with a successful dynamic graciloplasty. Complications were noted in 57 percent of patients. Explantation of the dynamic graciloplasty was necessary in 32 percent of patients, mainly because of infection of the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence are reasonable for this specific group of patients with limited treatment options. Despite functional dynamic graciloplasty, the results are worse than those for the total group of patients with dynamic graciloplasty. Rectal sensitivity and type of malformation are prognostic factors for outcome and can be used to select patients for treatment with dynamic graciloplasty, thereby improving treatment outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. CG Baeten J Konsten E Heineman PB Soeters (1994) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty for anal atresia J Pediatr Surg 29 922–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-3468(94)90016-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD3MjktlY%3D Occurrence Handle7931971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. K McHugh (1998) ArticleTitleThe role of radiology in children with anorectal anomalies; with particular emphasis on MRI Eur J Radiol 26 194–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00095-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jvV2iug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9518228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CG Baeten O Uludag MJ Rongen (2001) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence Microsurgery 21 230–4 Occurrence Handle10.1002/micr.1045 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpsFKnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11746553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. EM Kuyk Particlevan AT Brugman-Boezeman M Wissink-Essink RS Severijnen C Festen G Bleijenberg (2000) ArticleTitleBiopsychosocial treatment of defecation problems in children with anal atresia: a retrospective study Pediatr Surg Int 16 317–21 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003830000381 Occurrence Handle10955553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A Pena A Hong (2000) ArticleTitleAdvances in the management of anorectal malformations Am J Surg 180 370–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00491-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtF2gsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11137690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. W Mulder E Jong Particlede I Wauters M Kinders HA Heij A Vos (1995) ArticleTitlePosterior sagittal anorectoplasty: functional results of primary and secondary operations in comparison to the pull-through method in anorectal malformations Eur J Pediatr Surg 5 170–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2MrmtlM%3D Occurrence Handle7547806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A Pena (1995) ArticleTitleAnorectal malformations Semin Pediatr Surg 4 35–47 Occurrence Handle7728507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. PA deVries A Pena (1982) ArticleTitlePosterior sagittal anorectoplasty J Pediatr Surg 17 638–43 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD1critlw%3D Occurrence Handle7175658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Pena K Guardino JM Tovilla MA Levitt G Rodriguez R Torres (1998) ArticleTitleBowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations J Pediatr Surg 33 133–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90380-3 Occurrence Handle9473119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. CG Baeten HR Bailey A Bakka et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43 743–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhsFKjtg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SD Wexner C Baeten R Bailey et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 45 809–18 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6302-1 Occurrence Handle12072635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. AE Chapman B Geerdes P Hewett et al. (2002) ArticleTitleSystematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence Br J Surg 89 138–53 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02018.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387isV2juw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11856125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. C Baeten F Spaans A Fluks (1988) ArticleTitleAn implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle: report of a case Dis Colon Rectum 31 134–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC3M%2FovFU%3D Occurrence Handle3338345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Konsten CG Baeten F Spaans MG Havenith PB Soeters (1993) ArticleTitleFollow-up of anal dynamic graciloplasty for fecal continence World J Surg 17 404–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA3s7nvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8337888

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BJ Mander SD Wexner NS Williams et al. (1999) ArticleTitlePreliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter Br J Surg 86 1543–8 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01285.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fmt1ChtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10594503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. I Sielezneff AJ Malouf DC Bartolo A Pryde S Douglas (1999) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of patients with faecal incontinence Br J Surg 86 61–5 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00936.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7kvFKjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10027361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. NS Williams J Patel BD George RI Hallan ES Watkins (1991) ArticleTitleDevelopment of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter Lancet 338 1166–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(91)92031-V Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D2cjoslI%3D Occurrence Handle1682591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MJ Rongen O Uludag K Naggar ParticleEl BP Geerdes J Konsten CG Baeten (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 46 716–21 Occurrence Handle12794571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. H Hedlund A Pena G Rodriguez J Maza (1992) ArticleTitleLong-term anorectal function in imperforate anus treated by a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: manometric investigation J Pediatr Surg 27 906–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-3468(92)90395-N Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A2cbitVc%3D Occurrence Handle1640342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. JW Briel WR Schouten EA Vlot S Smits I Kessel Particlevan (1997) ArticleTitleClinical value of colonic irrigation in patients with continence disturbances Dis Colon Rectum 40 802–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA28vptVM%3D Occurrence Handle9221856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. AM Leroi F Michot P Grise P Denis (2001) ArticleTitleEffect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 44 779–89 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzhvFOqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11391135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. E Ganio A Masin C Ratto et al. (2001) ArticleTitleShort-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients:Evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders Dis Colon Rectum 44 1261–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjsFWgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11584196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. E Ganio C Ratto A Masin et al. (2001) ArticleTitleNeuromodulation for fecal incontinence: outcome in 16 patients with definitive implant. The initial Italian Sacral Neurostimulation Group (GINS) experience Dis Colon Rectum 44 965–70 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvltVyhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11496076

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. KE Matzel U Stadelmaier M Hohenfellner FP Gall (1995) ArticleTitleElectrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence Lancet 346 1124–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91799-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD3snkt1E%3D Occurrence Handle7475602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. KE Matzel U Stadelmaier M Hohenfellner W Hohenberger (2001) ArticleTitleChronic sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: long-term results with foramen and cuff electrodes Dis Colon Rectum 44 59–66 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FnvVGitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11805564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ö Uludag M Darby CH Dejong WR Schouten CG Baeten (2002) ArticleTitleSacral neuromodulation: effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence with intact sphincter muscles. A prospective study [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdsch Geneesk 146 989–93 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zhs1ygug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm AJ Roy RJ Nicholls (2000) ArticleTitleDouble-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 43 298–302 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7psFantQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10733109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm IC Turner RJ Nicholls J Woloszko (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence Gut 44 407–12 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7lt1WgtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10026329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WD Wong LL Jensen DC Bartolo DA Rothenberger (1996) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 39 1345–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38vkvVw%3D Occurrence Handle8969658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DF Altomare G Dodi F Torre ParticleLa G Romano E Melega M Rinaldi (2001) ArticleTitleMulticentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence Br J Surg 88 1481–6 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01895.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnkvVensA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11683745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. J Christiansen B Sparso (1992) ArticleTitleTreatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter Ann Surg 215 383–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3MvpvFc%3D Occurrence Handle1558420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. PA Lehur JV Roig M Duinslaeger (2000) ArticleTitleArtificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation Dis Colon Rectum 43 1100–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVSgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. PS Malone PG Ransley EM Kiely (1990) ArticleTitlePreliminary report: the antegrade continence enema Lancet 336 1217–8 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0140-6736(90)92834-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2c7jt1Q%3D Occurrence Handle1978072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. ER Kokoska MS Keller TR Weber (2001) ArticleTitleOutcome of the antegrade colonic enema procedure in children with chronic constipation Am J Surg 182 625–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00816-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387ktVOjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11839328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. NN Youssef E Barksdale SuffixJr JM Griffiths AF Flores C Lorenzo ParticleDi (2002) ArticleTitleManagement of intractable constipation with antegrade enemas in neurologically intact children J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 34 402–5 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005176-200204000-00016 Occurrence Handle11930097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Sacha M. Koch M.D., Ã–zenç UludaÄŸ M.D., Mart-Jan Rongen M.D., Cor G. Baeten M.D., Ph.D. & Wim van Gemert M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Sacha M. Koch M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Özenç Uludağ M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mart-Jan Rongen M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cor G. Baeten M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wim van Gemert M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cor G. Baeten M.D., Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, S., UludaÄŸ, Ã., Rongen, MJ. et al. Dynamic Graciloplasty in Patients Born With an Anorectal Malformation. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1711–1719 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0683-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0683-z

Key words

Search

Navigation