Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Follow-Up of Dynamic Graciloplasty for Fecal Incontinence

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Graciloplasty has been used as a treatment for end-stage fecal incontinence since 1946. Electric stimulation with an implantable pulse generator has existed for 15 years. The gracilis muscle is wrapped around the anal canal and stimulated by intramuscular electrodes connected with an implantable pulse generator. Initial reports have been promising, but long-term results have not been presented to date. METHODS: Data of 200 consecutive patients with a follow-up of at least two years were analyzed in a prospective manner from 1986 until 1999. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 72 percent. In patients with fecal incontinence caused by trauma, the rate was 82 percent. Once continent, patients remained continent after a median follow-up of 261 (standard deviation, 132) weeks. Median survival of the implantable pulse generator until battery expiration was 405 weeks. Disturbed evacuation remained a problem in 16 percent of all patients. Complications were frequent but treatable. CONCLUSION: Dynamic graciloplasty is a good, cost-effective treatment for fecal incontinence with results lasting for a median of more than five years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C Baeten F Spaans A Fluks (1988) ArticleTitleAn implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle Dis Colon Rectum 31 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. NS Williams J Patel BD George RI Hallan ES Watkins (1991) ArticleTitleDevelopment of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter Lancet 338 1166–1169

    Google Scholar 

  3. M Seccia C Menconi R Balestri E Cavina (1994) ArticleTitleStudy protocols and functional results in 86 electrostimulated graciloplasties Dis Colon Rectum 37 897–904

    Google Scholar 

  4. CG Baeten J Konsten F Spaans et al. (1991) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence Lancet 338 1163–1165

    Google Scholar 

  5. CG Baeten BP Geerdes EM Adang et al. (1995) ArticleTitleAnal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence N Engl J Med 332 1600–1605

    Google Scholar 

  6. RD Madoff HR Rosen CG Baeten et al. (1999) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence Gastroenterology 116 549–556

    Google Scholar 

  7. BP Geerdes HA Kurvers J Konsten E Heineman CG Baeten (1997) ArticleTitleAssessment of ischaemia of the distal part of the gracilis muscle during transposition for anal dynamic graciloplasty Br J Surg 84 1127–1129

    Google Scholar 

  8. BP Geerdes E Heineman J Konsten PB Soeters CG Baeten (1996) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty Dis Colon Rectum 39 912–917

    Google Scholar 

  9. J Konsten CG Baeten MG Havenith PB Soeters (1993) ArticleTitleMorphology of dynamic graciloplasty compared with the anal sphincter Dis Colon Rectum 36 559–563

    Google Scholar 

  10. AJ Malouf CS Norton AF Engel RJ Nicholls MA Kamm (2000) ArticleTitleLong-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma Lancet 355 260–265

    Google Scholar 

  11. EM Adang GL Engel FF Rutten BP Geerdes CG Baeten (1998) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients with fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 41 725–734

    Google Scholar 

  12. CG Baeten HR Bailey A Bakka et al. (2000) ArticleTitleSafety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group Dis Colon Rectum 43 743–751

    Google Scholar 

  13. I Sielezneff AJ Malouf DC Bartolo A Pryde S Douglas (1999) ArticleTitleDynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of patients with faecal incontinence Br J Surg 86 61–65

    Google Scholar 

  14. C Mavrantonis SD Wexner (1999) ArticleTitleStimulated graciloplasty for treatment of intractable fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 42 497–504

    Google Scholar 

  15. KE Matzel U Stadelmaier M Hohenfellner FP Gall (1995) ArticleTitlePermanent electrostimulation of sacral spinal nerves with an implantable neurostimulator in treatment of fecal incontinence [in German] Chirurg 66 813–817

    Google Scholar 

  16. CJ Vaizey MA Kamm AJ Roy RJ Nicholls (2000) ArticleTitleDouble-blind crossover study of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 43 298–302

    Google Scholar 

  17. WD Wong SM Congliosi MP Spencer et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 45 1139–1153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rongen, MJ.G., Uludag, Ö., El Naggar, K. et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Dynamic Graciloplasty for Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 716–721 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6645-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6645-7

Keywords

Navigation