Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective study of transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) in pelvic reconstructive surgery with vaginal hysterectomy after 3 years’ follow-up

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study is to analyze prospectively the anatomical and functional outcomes of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery using the Prolift™ system for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with hysterectomy.

Methods

A prospective, observational, noncomparative study was conducted in 80 patients with prolapse ≥2. Postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage was the main outcome measure. Anatomical cure was defined as vaginal vault stage 0 and improvement as stage 1. Secondary outcomes include pelvic floor distress inventory-20, incontinence impact questionnaire short form-7, and pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form-7.

Results

A total of 80 patients were recruited. The cure and improvement rates were 96.3 % (77/80) and 3.7 % (3/80) respectively at 1 year. At the follow-up of 3-years, the cure rates were 93.3 % (70/75). Among the five patients, three had stage 2 anterior wall prolapse, two had stage 2 posterior wall prolapse. Only one patient with intraoperative adverse event (rectal perforation) was encountered. Postoperative complications included prolonged catheterization in three patients (3.7 %), postoperative stress urinary incontinence in five patients (6.25 %) and asymptomatic mesh extrusions in five patients (6.25 %). All of them occurred within 1 year follow-up. Significant improvements in quality of life were detected at 1 and 3 years compared with baseline.

Conclusion

The total Prolift™ system surgery represents a safe, simple and useful treatment for severe POP with satisfactory objective clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

POP-Q:

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

PFDI-20:

Pelvic floor distress inventory-20

IIQ-7:

Incontinence impact questionnaire short form -7

PFIQ-7:

Pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form -7

References

  1. Seo JT, Kim JM (2006) Pelvic organ support and prevalence by pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women. J Urol 175(5):1769–1772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen AL, Sminth VJ, Bergstrom UL, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang WC, Lin TY, Lau HH, Chen SS, Hsieh CH, Su TH (2011) Outcome of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery with Prolift after a median of 2 year’s follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 22:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B (2007) Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(7):743–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. NICE (2008) Surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse using mesh. Interventional procedure guidance 267 London: NICE. Available at www.nice.org.uk

  6. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, Delancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Delancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113:117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse withe Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maher C, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(2):195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Denman MA, Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Smith V, Edwards SR, Clark AL (2008) Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985:555e1–555e5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diwardkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE (2009) Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinoul P, Ombelet WU, Burger MP, Roovers JP (2008) A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (Prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:615–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Ridder D (2008) Should we use meshes in the management of vaginal prolapse? Curr Opin Urol 18:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobashi KC (2009) Management of erosion of graft materials in pelvic floor reconstruction. Sci World J 9:32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

I declare that there is no conflict of interest between the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan-Feng Song.

Additional information

The article supported by the Fujian Provincial Youth Talent Project 2008F3087.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, FM., He, CN. & Song, YF. Prospective study of transobturator mesh kit (Prolift™) in pelvic reconstructive surgery with vaginal hysterectomy after 3 years’ follow-up. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 355–359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2713-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2713-3

Keywords

Navigation