Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift™ technique)—a case series multicentric study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our goal was to report the preliminary results of a transvaginal mesh repair of genital prolapse using the Prolift™ system. This retrospective multicentric study includes 110 patients. All patients had a stage 3 (at the hymen) or stage 4 (beyond the hymen) prolapse. Total mesh was used in 59 patients (53.6%), an isolated anterior mesh in 22 patients (20%) and an isolated posterior mesh in 29 patients (26.4%). We report one bladder injury sutured at surgery and two haematomas requiring secondary surgical management. At 3 months, 106 patients were available for follow-up. Mesh exposure occurred in five patients (4.7%), two of them requiring a surgical management. Granuloma without exposure occurred in three patients (2.8%). Failure rate (recurrent prolapse even asymptomatic or low grade symptomatic prolapse) was 4.7%. According to the perioperative and immediate post-operative results, Prolift™ repair seems to be a safe technique to correct pelvic organ prolapse. Anatomical and functional results must be assessed with a long-term follow-up to confirm the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark AL, Gregory T, Smith VJ, Edwards R (2003) Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1261–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD (2004) Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cosson M, Boukerrou M, Lambaudie E, Lobry P, Crépin G, Ego A (2003) [Biomechanics of stress distribution and resistance of biological tissues: why use prostheses for the cure of genital prolapse?] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 32:329–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner J (1995) Mesh materials in hernia repair. In: Schumpelick V, Wantz GE (eds) Inguinal hernia repair. Expert meeting on hernia surgery, St Moritz, 1994. Karger, Basel, pp 172–179

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Scambia G, Villet R (2005) The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:376–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1418–1421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maher C, Baessler K (2006) Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1997) The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8:105–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Julian M (1996) The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior migvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1472–1475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M (1999) A three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 10:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuuva N, Nilsson CG (2002) A nationwide analysis of complications associated with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cosson M, Boukerrou M, Lobry P, Crépin G, Ego A (2003) [Mechanical properties of biological or synthetic implants used to cure genital prolapse and stress incontinence: what is the ideal material?] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 32:321–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Clavé H, Cosson M, Garbin O, Jacquetin B, Rosenthal C, Salet-Lizée D, Villet R (2004) [Changing attitudes on the surgical treatment of urogenital prolapse: birth of the tension-free vaginal mesh]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 33:577–588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR (1989) Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 34:388–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fatton B, Jacquetin B (2003) Sacrospinous fixation according to Richter. In Stanton SL, Zimmern PZ (eds) Female pelvic reconstructive surgery, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 192–199

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA (2004) Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG 111:831–836

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cosson M, Caquant F, Collinet P, Rosenthal C, Clave H, Debodinance P, Garbin O, Berrocal J, Villet R, Jacquetin B (2005) Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment using the TVM group: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Communication in the ICS meeting, Montreal, 31 August 2005

  22. Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit MH (2002) Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1473–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reilly BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL (2005) Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M (2005) Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG 112:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dwyer PL, O’Reilly B (2005) Dyspareunia following vaginal surgery for prolapse using polypropylene mesh. Re: paper by Milani et al. BJOG 112:1164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva WA, Karram MM (2005) Scientific basis for use of grafts during vaginal reconstructive procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:519–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Annick Larochelle and Dr. Corinne Dabadie for their contribution with the collection of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Fatton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fatton, B., Amblard, J., Debodinance, P. et al. Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift™ technique)—a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J 18, 743–752 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0234-3

Keywords

Navigation