Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-world clinical experience with the percutaneous extracorporeal life support system: Results from the German Lifebridge® Registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The concept of percutaneous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is based on immediate cardiovascular stabilization allowing for sufficient end-organ perfusion, thus improving the outcome in patients with circulatory arrest. Lifebridge® (Zoll Medical GmbH, Germany) is a portable ECLS device designed for rapid application due to its automated set-up.

Methods

A total of 60 tertiary cardiovascular centers were interrogated with regard to application and short-term results after use of Lifebridge ECLS system. Detailed data were collected by standardized case report forms in all centers consented to participate in the study. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics of the patient population, procedural and follow-up data were recorded and analyzed.

Results

In total, 444 patients were analyzed regarding mortality. The detailed study cohort consisted of 112 patients. A total of 80% of the study subjects represented patients post cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 43% were in cardiogenic shock and 50% suffered from acute myocardial infarction. The survival rates were 36% immediately after device implementation and 16% after 30 days. Multivariable analysis revealed that only serum lactate concentration at admission could be proven as independent predictor of patients’ outcome. Patients with lactate concentrations above 10 mmol/L exhibited > 95% mortality (p < 0.05 versus below 10 mmol/L).

Conclusion

The present study provides real-world clinical data of patients treated with a transportable automated ECLS system. In conclusion, Lifebridge is a safely applicable cardiorespiratory stabilization tool associated with acceptable complication rates. Nevertheless, mortality rates were high in these critically ill patients, especially in those showing high lactate concentrations at admission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J (2009) Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation 119:1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH (1999) Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 341:625–634. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199908263410901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, Bonde P (2014) National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1407–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prondzinsky R, Unverzagt S, Russ M, Lemm H, Swyter M, Wegener N, Buerke U, Raaz U, Ebelt H, Schlitt A, Heinroth K, Haerting J, Werdan K, Buerke M (2012) Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardiale infarction complicated by cardiogenetic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial. Shock Inj Inflamm Sepsis Lab Clin Approaches 37:378–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e31824a67af

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjauw KD, Engström AE, Vis MM, van der Schaaf RJ, Baan J, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Tijssen JGP, Henriques JPS (2009) A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur Heart J 30:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, Ferenc M, Olbrich H-G, Hausleiter J, de Waha A, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Lauer B, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Werdan K, Schuler G (2013) Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 382:1638–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, Ferenc M, Olbrich H-G, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K (2012) Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287–1296. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1208410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P (2018) 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39:119–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shah M, Patnaik S, Patel B, Ram P, Garg L, Agarwal M, Agrawal S, Arora S, Patel N, Wald J, Jorde UP (2018) Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Clin Res Cardiol 107:287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Backhaus T, Fach A, Schmucker J, Fiehn E, Garstka D, Stehmeier J, Hambrecht R, Wienbergen H (2018) Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 107:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiele H, Smalling RW, Schuler GC (2007) Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 28:2057–2063. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung C, Janssen K, Kaluza M, Fuernau G, Poerner TC, Fritzenwanger M, Pfeifer R, Thiele H, Figulla HR (2016) Outcome predictors in cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Res Cardiol 105:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0906-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y-S, Lin J-W, Yu H-Y, Ko W-J, Jerng J-S, Chang W-T, Chen W-J, Huang S-C, Chi N-H, Wang C-H, Chen L-C, Tsai P-R, Wang S-S, Hwang J-J, Lin F-Y (2008) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 372:554–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60958-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung C, Schlosser M, Figulla H-R, Ferrari M (2009) Providing macro- and microcirculatory support with the Lifebridge System during high-risk PCI in cardiogenic shock. Heart Lung Circ 18:296–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2008.05.601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung C, Franz M, Figulla H-R, Sonntag S, Hug M, Mudra H, Bauerschmitt R, Kleber F-X, Feindt P, Mehlhorn U, Vahl C, Bruns H-J, Ferrari M (2015) Percutaneous extracorporeal life support in patients with circulatory failure: results of the German Lifebridge Registry. J Invasive Cardiol 27:93–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paden ML, Conrad SA, Rycus PT, Thiagarajan RR (2013) Extracorporeal life support organization registry report 2012. ASAIO J 59:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182904a52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers JG, O’Connor CM (2014) The changing landscape of advanced heart failure therapeutics. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1416–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouweneel DM, Schotborgh JV, Limpens J, Sjauw KD, Engström AE, Lagrand WK, Cherpanath TGV, Driessen AHG, de Mol BAJM, Henriques JPS (2016) Extracorporeal life support during cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42:1922–1934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4536-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ouweneel DM, Henriques JPS (2012) Percutaneous cardiac support devices for cardiogenic shock: current indications and recommendations. Heart 98:1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS (2014) Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 35:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Waha S, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Wiedau A, Lurz P, Schuler G, Thiele H (2016) Long-term prognosis after extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock: results from a real-world cohort. EuroIntervention 11:1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11I12A265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, Moscucci M, Saucedo J, Hosat S, Jiang X, Slater J, LeJemtel T, Hochman JS (2003) Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J 24:828–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. de Waha S, Graf T, Desch S, Fuernau G, Eitel I, Pöss J, Jobs A, Stiermaier T, Ledwoch J, Wiedau A, Lurz P, Schuler G, Thiele H (2017) Outcome of elderly undergoing extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 106:379–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1068-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Parissis H, Soo A, Al-Alao B (2011) Intra aortic balloon pump: literature review of risk factors related to complications of the intraaortic balloon pump. J Cardiothorac Surg 6:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-6-147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vellinga NAR, Boerma EC, Koopmans M, Donati A, Dubin A, Shapiro NI, Pearse RM, van der Voort PHJ, Dondorp AM, Bafi T, Fries M, Akarsu-Ayazoglu T, Pranskunas A, Hollenberg S, Balestra G, van Iterson M, Sadaka F, Minto G, Aypar U, Hurtado FJ, Martinelli G, Payen D, van Haren F, Holley A, Gomez H, Mehta RL, Rodriguez AH, Ruiz C, Canales HS, Duranteau J, Spronk PE, Jhanji S, Hubble S, Chierego M, Jung C, Martin D, Sorbara C, Bakker J, Ince C (2017) Mildly elevated lactate levels are associated with microcirculatory flow abnormalities and increased mortality: a microSOAP post hoc analysis. Crit Care 21:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1842-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vink EE, Bakker J (2018) Practical use of lactate levels in the intensive care. J Intensive Care Med 33:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617708563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiyatkin ME, Bakker J (2017) Lactate and microcirculation as suitable targets for hemodynamic optimization in resuscitation of circulatory shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 23:348–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masyuk M, Wernly B, Lichtenauer M, Franz M, Kabisch B, Muessig JM, Zimmermann G, Lauten A, Schulze PC, Hoppe UC, Kelm M, Bakker J, Jung C (2019) Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 45:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5475-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jung C, Bueter S, Wernly B, Masyuk M, Saeed D, Albert A, Fuernau G, Kelm M, Westenfeld R (2019) Lactate clearance predicts good neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030374

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Neill WW, Kleiman NS, Moses J, Henriques JPS, Dixon S, Massaro J, Palacios I, Maini B, Mulukutla S, Dzavík V, Popma J, Douglas PS, Ohman M (2012) A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation 126:1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thiele H, Allam B, Chatellier G, Schuler G, Lafont A (2010) Shock in acute myocardial infarction: the Cape Horn for trials? Eur Heart J 31:1828–1835. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Becher PM, Schrage B, Sinning CR, Schmack B, Fluschnik N, Schwarzl M, Waldeyer C, Lindner D, Seiffert M, Neumann JT, Bernhardt AM, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Reichenspurner H, Blankenberg S, Twerenbold R, Westermann D (2018) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiopulmonary support. Circulation 138:2298–2300. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Donker DW, Brodie D, Henriques JPS, Broomé M (2019) Left ventricular unloading during veno-arterial ECMO: a review of percutaneous and surgical unloading interventions. Perfusion 34:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659118794112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schrage B, Burkhoff D, Rübsamen N, Becher PM, Schwarzl M, Bernhardt A, Grahn H, Lubos E, Söffker G, Clemmensen P, Reichenspurner H, Blankenberg S, Westermann D (2018) Unloading of the left ventricle during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in cardiogenic shock. JACC Heart Fail 6:1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JS, Roberts SWP, Götsch K, Moeller U, Hawryluck L (2019) Caring for critically ill patients in humanitarian settings. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201806-1059CP

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masyuk, M., Abel, P., Hug, M. et al. Real-world clinical experience with the percutaneous extracorporeal life support system: Results from the German Lifebridge® Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 109, 46–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01482-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01482-2

Keywords

Navigation