Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and consecutive cardiogenic shock (CS) represent a challenge in clinical practice. Only few ‘real-world’ data on therapeutic management and outcome exist.

Methods

The present analysis focuses on changes of clinical management of STEMI-patients with CS and analyzes predictors of outcome using the Bremen-STEMI registry.

Results

Out of 7865 patients with STEMI, 981 patients (13%) presented with CS. Most CS patients (88%) underwent an early percutaneous intervention (PCI). Intraaortic balloon pumps (IABP) were less implanted since 2013 (p < 0.001), the rate of drug-eluting stents and periprocedural prasugrel or ticagrelor therapy increased over the years. Overall in-hospital mortality of patients with CS was 37%, 1 year mortality was 50%. A significantly reduced 1-year mortality (2006–2009: 55%, 2010–2013: 50%; 2014–2015: 43%, p = 0.027) was observed. In a multivariate analysis significant predictors of an increased 1-year mortality were acute renal failure (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.9–7.0), atrial fibrillation (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3–6.0), three-vessel disease (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3–4.7), age ≥ 75 years (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3–4.4) and anemia (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1–3.3). A successful performed PCI (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–0.9) was associated with a significantly reduced 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

management of patients with CS changed with a steep decrease of IABP implantations. Mortality of patients with CS decreased over the last 10 years. Especially, performance of successful PCI was associated with a reduction of mortality, indicating the crucial role of early revascularization to improve prognosis in this high-risk cohort of STEMI-patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reynolds HR, Hochmann JS (2008) Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation 117:686–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Osganian V, de Groot J, Bade J, Chen Z, Frid D, Dalen JE (1991) Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective 1975–1986. N Engl J Med 325(16):1117–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hochman JS, Boland J, Sleeper LA, Porway M, Brinker J, Col J, Jacobs A, Sister J, Miller D, Wassermann H, Menegus MA, Talley JD, McKinlay S, Sanborn T, LeJemtel T, Circulation (1995) Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality—results from an International Registry. s. I. Circulation 91:873–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Thompson CA, Gurwitz JH (2001) Recent magnitude of and temporal trends (1994–1997) in the incidence and hospital death rates of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the second national registry of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 141(1):65–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, Every N, Sichrovsky T, Hochman JS, NRMI (2005) Trends in management and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 294(4):448–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werden K, For the IABP Shock Trial Investigators (2012) Intaaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367(14):1287–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, de Waha A, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Lauer B, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Werdan K, Schuler G (2013) Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-Shock II): final 12 months results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 382(9905):1638–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuernau G, Fengler K, Desch S, Eitel I, Neumann FJ, Olbrich HG, de Waha A, de Waha S, Richart G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Hambrecht R, Jung C, Böhm M, Pöss J, Strasser RH, SChneider S, Quarrak T, Schuler G, Werdan K, Zeymer U, Thiele H (2016) Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IAB-Shock II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 105(12):1030–1041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Dzavik V, Buller CE, Aylward P, Col J, White HD, Investigators SHOCK (2006) Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 295(21):2511–2515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmucker J, Wienbergen H, Seide S, Fiehn E, Fach A, Würmann-Busch B, Gohlke H, Günther K, Ahrens W, Hambrecht R (2014) Smoking ban in public areas is associated with a reduced incidence of hospital admissions due to ST-elevation myocardial infarctions in non-smokers. Results from the Bremen STEMI Registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol:1180–1186

  11. Fach A, Bünger S, Zabrocki R, Schmucker J, Conradi P, Garstka D, Fiehn E, Hambrecht R, Wienbergen H (2015) Comparison and outcome of patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention analyzed by age groups (< 75, 75–85,>85); registry., results from the Bremen STEMI. Am J Cardiol 116(12):1802–1809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmucker J, Fach A, Becker M, Seide S, Bünger S, Zabrocki R, Fiehn E, Würmann-Busch B, Pohlabeln H, Günther K, Ahren W, Hambrecht R, Wienbergen H (2017) Predictors of acute kidney injury in patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction—results from the Bremen STEMI-Registry. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617708975 (Epub ahead of print)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steg PH, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandes-Aviles F, Gershlick AH, Gianuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van’t Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D (2012) Acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation ESC clinical practice guidelines. Eur Heart J 33(20):2569–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, The Writing Group on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33(20):2551–2567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization (2008) Worldwide prevalence on anaemia. World Health Organization

  16. Acute Kidney Injury Work Group (2012) Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO)—clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2:1–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, Jain D, Gotsis W, Ahmed A, Frishman WH, Fonarow GC (2014) Trends in incidence, management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. JAHA 3(3):e001056

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, Dzavik V, Wong SC, Menon V, Webb JG, Steinhart R, Picard MH, Menagus MA, Boland J, Sunburn T, Buller CE, Modus S, Forman R, Desvigne-Nickens P, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, LeJemtel TH, Group, The SHOCK Trial Study (1999) Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock: an international randomized trial of emergency PTCA/CABG-trial design. Am Heart J 137:313–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schuster A, Faulkner M, Zeymer U, Quarrak T, Eitel I, Deesch S, Hasenfuß G, Thiele H (2015) Economic implications of intra-aortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: an analysis from the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 104(7):566–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Unverzagt S, Buerke M, de Waha A, Haerting J, Pietzner D, Seyfarth M, Thiele H, Werdan K, Zeymer U, Prondzinsky (2015) Intra-aortic ballon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infaction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Windecker S, Kohl P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Assosciation for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 35:2541–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S (2015) Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 36(20):1223–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunker PR, Pfisterer ME, Stauffer JC, Erne P, Urban P (2008) Ten-year incidence and treatment of cariogenic shock. Ann Intern Med 149:618–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, Frigiola A, Sketch MH, Bossone E, Bates ER (2010) Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease? Am Heart J 159:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM (2007) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, Horrow J, Husted S, James S, Katus H, Mahaffey KW, Scirica BM, Skene A, Steg PG, Storey RF, Harrington RA, Freij A, Thorsén M (2009) Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 361:1045–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stone GW, Lansky AJ, Pocock SJ, Gersh BJ, Dangas G, Wong SC, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Möckel M, Ochala A, Kellock A, Parise H, Mehran R (2009) Paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 360(19):1946–1959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanic V, Vollrath M, Naji FH, Markota A, Sinkovic A. Impact of the new P2Y12 receptor inhibitors on mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with cardiogenic shock and/or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Pharm Open Access. 5:175. https://doi.org/10.4173/2329-6607.1000175

  29. Chen DY, Mao CT, Tsai ML, Chen SW, Lin YS, Hsieh IC, Hung MJ, Wang CH, Wen MS, Cherng WJ, Chen TH (2016) Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 215:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rene AG, Genereux P, Ezekowitz M, Kirtane AJ, XU K, Mehran R, Brener SJ, Stone GW (2014) Impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (from the HORIZONS-AMI [Harmonizing Outcomes with revascularization and stents in Acute Myocardial Infaction] Trial). Am J Cardiol 113:236–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nikolsky E, Ayong ED, Halkin A, Grines C, Cox DA, Garcia E, Mehrran R, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, Guagliumi G, Stuckey T, Turco M, Cohen DA, Negoita M, Lansky AJ, Stone GW (2004) Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the controlled abciximab and device investigation to lower late angioplasty complications (cadillac) trial. Clin Res Cardiol 44:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fengler K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Neumann FJ, Olbrich HG, de Waha A, de Waha S, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Pess J, Strasser R, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K, Zeymer U, Thiele H (2015) Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II trial. Clin Res Cardiol 103(1):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Backhaus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Backhaus, T., Fach, A., Schmucker, J. et al. Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry. Clin Res Cardiol 107, 371–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0

Keywords

Navigation