Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence and outcome of retained Port-A-Cath fragments during removal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Port-A-Cath devices are frequently used for long-term venous access. We postulate that long-term use predisposes them to getting stuck and retained in a central vein at the time of removal. We aim to report the incidence and outcome of this complication.

Methods

Between January 2006 and July 2016, a retrospective review of all Port-A-Cath removals that were performed at our centre was conducted. At the time of removal, catheters that could not be removed from the vein were considered retained.

Results

During the study period, 107 children had 174 episodes of silicone Sitimplant (Vygon, Ecouen, France) Port-A-Cath insertions. These children required 135 removal episodes and there were 3 (2.2%) instances whereby the catheter fragment was retained. These episodes of retained catheters only occurred in children with factor VIII deficiency (4.1% incidence in this cohort). For each episode of catheter insertion and removal, the catheters had been left in situ for a mean duration of 43 months in children with factor deficiency and no retained fragments, and the mean duration was 91 months in children with factor deficiency and retained catheter fragments (p = 0.0011).

Conclusions

Port-A-Caths that are retained after attempted removal is a complication encountered predominantly in catheters that have been in use for a prolonged duration. Furthermore, factor replacement therapy in haemophiliacs may be a risk factor for this complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson GJP, van Noesel MM, Hop WCJ, van de Ven C (2006) The catheter is stuck: complications experienced during removal of a totally implantable venous access device. A single-center study in 200 children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1694–1698. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bautista F, Gomez-Chacon J, Costa E et al (2010) Retained intravascular fragments after removal of indwelling central venous catheters: a single institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 45:1491–1495. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan BKY, Rupasinghe SN, Hennessey I et al (2013) Retained central venous lines (CVLs) after attempted removal: an 11-year series and literature review. J Pediatr Surg 48:1887–1891. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen PC, Chen CJ (2007) Removal of retained Port-A catheter in central lines in a pediatric population. Tzu Chi Med J 19:245–248. doi:10.1016/S1016-3190(10)60023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiang DZ, Verbeken EK, Van Lommel ATL et al (1998) Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter. J Vasc Surg 28:260–271. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70162-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones SA, Giacomantonio M (2003) A complication associated with central line removal in the pediatric population: retained fixed catheter fragments. J Pediatr Surg 38:594–596. doi:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Milbrandt K, Beaudry P, Anderson R et al (2009) A multiinstitutional review of central venous line complications: retained intravascular fragments. J Pediatr Surg 44:972–976. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quaretti P, Galli F, Fiorina I et al (2014) A refinement of Hong’s technique for the removal of stuck dialysis catheters: an easy solution to a complex problem. J Vasc Access 15:183–188. doi:10.5301/jva.5000186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan SE, Hadziomerovic A, Aquino J et al (2012) Endoluminal dilation technique to remove “stuck” tunneled hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:1089–1093. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farooq A, Jones V, Agarwal S (2012) Balloon dilatation: a helpful technique for removal of a stuck dialysis line. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:1528–1530. doi:10.1007/s00270-012-0365-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong J (2010) An easy technique for removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in central veins. J Vasc Access 11:59–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bessoud B, de Baere T, Kuoch V et al (2003) Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:527–532. doi:10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dillon PA, Foglia RP (2006) Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device. J Pediatr Surg 41:1582–1587. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oduntan O, Turner J (2013) Empyema thoracis due to intrapleural migration of retained vascular catheter. Ann Thorac Surg 95:e123–e125. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Surov A, Wienke A, Carter JM et al (2009) Intravascular embolization of venous catheter-causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review. J Parenter Enter Nutr 33:677–685. doi:10.1177/0148607109335121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Girolami A, Scandellari R, Zanon E et al (2006) Non-catheter associated venous thrombosis in hemophilia A and B. A critical review of all reported cases. J Thromb Thrombolysis 21:279–284. doi:10.1007/s11239-006-6556-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Idowu O, Brown J, Kim S, Kim S (2016) Mechanics of a stuck central venous catheter removal. J Pediatr Surg 51:872–875. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lodi M, Ebrahimi RF, Pezzotti P, Carbonari L (2016) The removal of a stuck catheter: an alternative to Hong’s technique. J Vasc Access 17:548–551. doi:10.5301/jva.5000557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olugbenga Michael Aworanti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aworanti, O.M., Linnane, N., Tareen, F. et al. Incidence and outcome of retained Port-A-Cath fragments during removal. Pediatr Surg Int 33, 777–781 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4103-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4103-6

Keywords

Navigation