Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine, by means of a systematic review, whether the method of wound closure in complicated appendicitis affects the incidence of wound infection. A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases including MEDLINE (1980–2003), was performed, using the Cochrane search strategy, for articles on wound closure and complicated appendicitis. Clinical trials examining the method of wound closure were selected for systematic review and all quasi-randomized and randomized trials underwent meta-analysis. Failure to close the wound as planned in delayed closure (DC) was considered indicative of a wound infection. Purulent drainage requiring wound opening indicated an infection in the wounds closed primarily. Six randomized trials were considered adequate for meta-analysis. None independently showed a statistically significant difference in the risk of developing a wound infection with primary closure (PC). When pooled data were subjected to meta-analysis, PC achieved a statistically significant reduction in the relative risk of treatment failure and did not lead to an increase in wound infections. Primary closure does not increase the risk of developing a wound infection after operation for perforated appendicitis. Given the lack of benefit of DC, and the less traumatic, less painful, and less costly nature of PC; primary closure is a safe and practical treatment option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janik JS, Firor HV (1979) Pediatric appendicitis: a 20-year study of 1640 children at Cook County (Illinois) Hospital. Arch Surg 114:717–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bower RJ, Bell MJ, Ternberg JL (1981) Controversial aspects of appendicitis management in children. Arch Surg 116:885–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz MZ, Tapper D, Solenberger RI (1983) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: the controversy continues. Ann Surg 197:407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz SI (1994) Appendix. In: Schwartz SI (ed) Principles of surgery, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1307–1318

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu CD, McFadden DW (1997) Acute abdomen and appendix. In: Greenfield LJ (ed) Surgery: scientific principles and practice, 3rd edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1246–1261

    Google Scholar 

  6. Condon RE, Telford GL (1991) Appendicitis. In Sabiston DC (ed) Textbook of surgery, 14th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 884–898

    Google Scholar 

  7. David IB, Buck JR, Filler RM (1982) Rational use of antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 17:494–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karp MP, Caldarola VA, Cooney DR et al (1986) The avoidable excesses in the management of perforated appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 21:506–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seco JL, Ojeda E, Reguilon C et al (1990) Combined topical and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 159:226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnweit C, Bilik R, Shandling B (2001) Primary closure of contaminated wounds in perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 26:1362–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neilson IR, Laberge JM, Nguyen LT et al (1990) Appendicitis in children: current therapeutic recommendations. J Pediatr Surg 25:1113–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Curran TJ, Muenchow SK (1993) The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children using peritoneal drainage: results from a public hospital. J Pediatr Surg 28:204–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lund DP, Murphy EU (1994) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. J Pediatr Surg 29:1130–1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller MS, McBride WJ, Vane DW (1996) Management of complicated appendicitis: a rational approach based on clinical course. Arch Surg 131:261–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Serour F, Efrati Y, Klin B et al (1996) Subcuticular skin closure as a standard approach to emergency appendectomy in children: prospective clinical trial. World J Surg 20:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor E, Dev V, Shah D et al (2000) Complicated appendicitis: is there a minimum intravenous antibiotic requirement? A prospective randomized trial. Am Surg 66:887–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emil S, Laberge JM, Mikhail P et al (2003) Appendicitis in children: a ten-year update of therapeutic recommendations. J Pediatr Surg 38:236–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meier DE, Guzzetta PC, Barber RG et al (2003) Perforated appendicitis in children: is there a best treatment? J Pediatr Surg 38:1520–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen C, Botelho C, Cooper A et al (2003) Current practice patterns in the treatment of perforated appendicitis in children. J Am Coll Surg 196:212–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Newman K, Ponsky T, Kittle K et al (2003) Appendicitis 2000: variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at thirty pediatric hospitals. J Pediatr Surg 38:372–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2001) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ Publishing Group, London, pp 285–312

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pettigrew RA (1981) Delayed primary wound closure in gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg 68:635–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsang TM, Tam PKH, Saing H (1992) Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. Arch Surg 127:451–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khammash MR, Ayyash K (1994) Wound infection in primary versus delayed primary wound closure in cases of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis. Saudi Med J 15:408–410

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohn SM, Giannotti G, Ong AW et al (2001) Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds. Ann Surg 233:409–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chatwiriyacharoen W (2002) Surgical wound infection post surgery in perforated appendicitis in children. J Med Assoc Thai 85:572–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McGreal GT, Joy A, Manning B et al (2002) Antiseptic wick: does it reduce the incidence of wound infection following appendectomy? World J Surg 26:631–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panagopoulos G et al (2000) Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: a meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily. Surgery 127:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Pediatric Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, FMB 132, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT, 06520-8062, UK

    Marion C. W. Henry & R. Lawrence Moss

Authors
  1. Marion C. W. Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Lawrence Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Lawrence Moss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, M.C.W., Moss, R.L. Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Ped Surgery Int 21, 625–630 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1476-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1476-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation