Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the predictability of the two flavors of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) based on a long-term retrospective prediction from 1881 to 2017 with the Community Earth System Model. Specifically, the Central-Pacific (CP) ENSO has a more obvious Spring Predictability Barrier and lower deterministic prediction skill than the Eastern-Pacific (EP) ENSO. The potential predictability declines with lead time for both the two flavors of ENSO, and the EP ENSO has a higher upper limit of the prediction skill as compared with the CP ENSO. The predictability of the two flavors of ENSO shows distinct interdecadal variation for both actual skill and potential predictability; however, their trends in the predictability are not synchronized. The signal component controls the seasonal and interdecadal variations of predictability for the two flavors of ENSO, and has larger contribution to the CP ENSO than the EP ENSO. There is significant scope for improvement in predicting the two flavors of ENSO, especially for the CP ENSO.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is an important air-sea interaction mode in the tropical Pacific region, which has attracted extensive attention in the past few decades. The ENSO events can be classified as Eastern-Pacific (EP) ENSO or Central-Pacific (CP) ENSO according to the location of the maximum sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA). The EP ENSO is also referred to as the canonical ENSO or Cold Tongue ENSO (Kug et al. 2009; Yeh et al. 2009), with the center of maximum SSTAs located in the eastern Pacific. The CP ENSO is also known as the “ENSO Modoki” (Ashok et al. 2007) or Warm Pool ENSO (Kug et al. 2009; Yeh et al. 2009), and has the largest SSTAs variability in the central Pacific (Ashok et al. 2007; Kao and Yu 2009; Kug et al. 2009; Yu and Kao 2007; Yu et al. 2010; Zheng et al. 2014). Compared with the canonical ENSO, ENSO Modoki can generates different teleconnections (Taschetto and England 2009; Zhang et al. 2015), and has different effects on the precipitation (Ashok et al. 2009; Feng and Li 2011; Feng et al. 2016a; Jiang et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2013, 2014), the Hadley circulation (Feng and Li 2013), the stratosphere (Xie et al 2012, 2014a, b, c), aerosol concentrations (Feng et al. 2016b, 2017), and tropical cyclone activity (Kim et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2013; Magee et al. 2017). As the ENSO has a worldwide climatic effect, the prediction of ENSO can provide a predictability source for short range climate prediction. Given the obviously different climatic effects of the two flavors of ENSO events, it is necessary to comprehensively explore the predictability of the two flavors of ENSO.
The study of ENSO predictability involves two aspects: actual prediction skill and potential predictability. The former focuses on the accuracy of the model in predicting ENSO events against observations, whereas the latter quantitatively measures the upper limit of ENSO prediction skill under a perfect model assumption (Tang et al. 2018). It should be noted that the model is not perfect in reality. Therefore, the measured potential predictability is partly model dependent. However, a useful strategy to explore ENSO predictability is to conduct retrospective forecast experiment using numerical models with varying degrees of complexity. For the canonical ENSO events, many retrospective forecasts with complicated coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) have only been conducted 20–60 years (Luo et al. 2008; Qiao et al. 2013; Kirtman et al. 2014; MacLachlan et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2017; Takaya et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2018; Barnston et al. 2019; Ding et al. 2019; Johnson et al. 2019; Lin et al. 2020). The relatively short retrospective forecast periods only contain a few ENSO cycles, which are inadequate for us to achieve statistically robust cognize for the ENSO predictability, particularly with respect to the interdecadal variation. The existing long-term ENSO retrospective predictions have been mainly conducted with intermediate (Chen et al. 2004; Zheng et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2019; Gao et al. 2020) and hybrid coupled models (Tang et al. 2008a; Deng and Tang 2009; Tang and Deng 2011). These efforts revealed the interdecadal variation of the actual prediction skill for the canonical ENSO and the possible reasons accounting for this phenomenon.
However, predictability of the two flavors of ENSO in a long period retrospective forecast has received limited attention. Based on 30–60 years hindcasts using various models, previous studies have reached conflicting conclusions. Some studies have reported that the CP ENSO is more predictable than the EP ENSO due to its high persistence and low “Spring Predictability Barrier” (SPB) (Kim et al. 2009; Yang and Jiang 2014). Other studies have found that the models had better performance in predicting the EP ENSO as compared with the CP ENSO (Hendon et al. 2009; Jeong et al. 2012; Imada et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2018; Zheng and Yu 2017). Such divergent results may be due to the limited hindcast durations. In addition, the previous studies focused only on the actual prediction skill and the variation of the potential predictability for both the EP ENSO and CP ENSO remains unclear. Yao et al. (2019) reported that the Community Earth System Model (CESM) can fairly well simulate the two flavors of ENSO. Therefore, we conducted an ensemble long-term retrospective forecast with CESM from 1881 to 2017. This study focuses on the following issues: (1) how about the performance of the actual skill for the two flavors of ENSO in the CESM; (2) what are the features of the potential predictability for the two flavors of ENSO; (3) whether actual skill and potential predictability also undergo seasonal and interdecadal variations for the two flavors of ENSO, particularly for the CP ENSO. If so, which factor dominates the variation in the predictability for the two flavors of ENSO? These essential questions have not been well explored in previous studies. This paper is organized as follows. The description of the model, ensemble construction and evaluation metrics are introduced in Sect. 2. The characteristics of the actual skill of the two flavors of ENSO are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, we explore the possible reason accounting for the variation in the predictability of the two flavors of ENSO. Finally, the conclusions and discussion are summarized in Sect. 5.
2 Model and methodology
2.1 Model information
In this study, we used the CESM version 1.2.1 to formulate the atmosphere, ocean, land, land-ice, and sea-ice components. It is one of the most popular fully CGCM and has been involved in many seasonal forecast studies (Hurrell et al. 2013; Bellenger et al. 2014; Hu and Duan 2016; Bellomo et al. 2018; Hu et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2021). The atmospheric component is the Community Atmosphere Model version 4 (CAM4; Neale et al. 2013; horizontal resolution 0.9° × 1.25° with 26-layer hybrid sigma-pressure vertical coordinate). The oceanic component is the Parallel Ocean Program ocean model version 2 (POP 2; Smith et al. 2010; horizontal resolution 1.1° × 0.54–1° with60 layers in the vertical direction). It has been reported that the CESM can reasonably portray the characteristic of the two flavors of ENSO with the above model configuration (Yao et al. 2019). It is also employed as the operational model of the National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center in China (Li et al. 2015a, b; Zhang et al. 2018, 2019), and we modified its nudging scheme by adjusting the nudging weight of the subsurface ocean temperature at depths above 500 m and adding wind data assimilation below 500 hPa to improve the simulation and prediction skill for ENSO (Song et al. 2021).
Before 1983, the monthly mean upper ocean temperature and 6-hourly mean wind variables were extracted from the monthly Simple Ocean Data Assimilation version 2.2.4 (SODA 2.2.4; Carton and Giese 2008) and European Centre for Medium–Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) twentieth century reanalysis (ERA-20C; Stickler et al. 2014) to initialize the retrospective forecast. We then used the Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS; Behringer and Xue 2004) and ECMWF interim reanalysis (ERA-interim; Berrisford et al. 2011) as the oceanic and wind assimilation data from 1983 to 2017. The validation SST data were extracted from the SODA and GODAS datasets before and after 1983, respectively. To eliminate the effect of the low-frequency variation, the anomalies in this study were identified by subtracting the corresponding climatology of the running 20-year window both for the forecast and observational data as in Deng and Tang (2009).
2.2 Methodology
2.2.1 Ensemble construction strategy
To perturb the initial conditions, we employ the climatically relevant singular vector (CSV, Kleeman et al. 2003; Tang et al. 2006) method to obtain the singular vectors of the sea temperature above 200 m, which can consider the influence of the uncertainties of the upper sea temperature on SST prediction. The CSV method can capture the climatically relevant optimal error growth like the traditional SV but avoids using tangent linear and adjoint models. The CSV has also been used in various CGCMs to investigate climate predictability (Hawkins and Sutton 2011; Islam et al. 2016; Li et al. 2020). More details of the CSV algorithm may be found in the relevant literature (Kleeman et al. 2003; Tang et al. 2006). In this study, a random linear combination of the first three CSVs is employed to perturb the initial conditions and form 20 ensemble members. The ensemble retrospective forecast starts on January 1st, April 1st, July 1st and October 1st each calendar year from 1881 to 2017, with 12 month integrations for the initial conditions.
2.2.2 Predictability skill measures
In the current study, we employ the anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC) to measure the deterministic prediction skill, defined as:
The contribution of the prediction of the \(i\)th initial condition to the ACC (denoted as C) can be expressed as (Tang et al. 2008c):
where \(a_{i}^{o} \left( t \right)\) and \(a_{i}^{p} \left( t \right)\) indicate the ensemble mean prediction and corresponding observation of the \(i\)th initial condition at \(t\)th lead time, respectively. The overbar indicates the mean of the total initial conditions. \(M\) represents the total number of predictions. The symbol [] represents the standardization variable.
To measure the potential predictability, we used information-based measure (Tang et al. 2008b) and variance-based metric (Kumar et al. 2016). Compared with the actual prediction skill metric, both two types of measures avoid using observations. For a Gaussian variable \(v\), which is usually the case for most seasonal variables (including ENSO prediction), the climatological variance \(\sigma_{v}^{2}\) can be decomposed into a sum of noise variance (ensemble prediction variance) and signal (ensemble mean) variance (DelSole and Tippett 2007; Tippett et al. 2010):
The information-based measure mutual information (MI) and variance-based metric signal to total variance ratio (STR) are defined as (DelSole and Tippett 2007; Tang et al. 2013):
where the symbol \(\left\langle \cdots \right\rangle\) denotes the mean over all initial conditions. \(p\left( v \right)\), \(p\left( i \right)\) and \(p\left( {v,i} \right)\) indicate the climatological distribution, probability distribution for the initial condition \(i\) and forecast distribution of the \(i\)th initial condition, respectively. \(\mu_{v|i}^{{}}\) and \(\sigma_{{v{|}i}}^{2}\) denote the ensemble mean and ensemble prediction variance of the \(i\)th initial condition, respectively. In the perfect model framework, the potential correlation (denoted as R) is the ACC between the prediction (ensemble mean) and “perfect observation” (an arbitrarily predicted ensemble member). R has the following theoretical relationship with the STR as (Kumar 2009; Tang et al. 2013):
Given that the arithmetic mean is larger than or equal to the geometric mean, then we can derive from Eqs. (3)–(5) (Yang et al. 2012; Tang et al. 2013):
The transformation \(\sqrt {1 - e^{ - 2MI} }\) also exhibits proper limiting behavior of the “potential” skill scores (referred to as \(R_{MI}\); Joe 1989; DelSole 2005), with a maximum value (1) when MI approaches infinity, and minimum value (0) when MI vanishes. Therefore, it can be deduced that:
When the prediction variance \(\sigma_{v|i}^{2}\) is constant, the Eqs. (7)–(8) are equal.
Relative entropy (RE) is another information-based measure to quantify the potential predictability of each prediction, and the mean RE for all individual predictions is equal to MI (DelSole 2004; DelSole and Tippett 2007; Yang et al. 2012; Tang et al. 2013), which can be defined as:
where \(\sigma_{v\left| i \right.}^{2}\), and \(\sigma_{v}^{2}\) are the ensemble and climatological variances, respectively. And \(\mu_{v\left| i \right.}\) and \(\mu_{v}\) indicate the ensemble and climatological means, respectively. The RE represents the extra information from the difference between the climatological distribution and ensemble predicted distribution (Cover and Thomas 1991), which can be decomposed into the signal component (SC; the first term) and dispersion component (DC; the last three terms). The SC indicates additional information between the climatological and prediction means, while the DC represents a reduction in climatological uncertainty from the prediction.
Following the previous studies (Hendon et al. 2009; Jeong et al. 2012; Yang and Jiang 2014; Ren et al. 2016; Lee et al. 2018; Zheng and Yu 2017), we employed the Niño 3 index to depict the variability of the canonical ENSO or EP ENSO events, which is defined as the averaged SSTAs from 5° S–5° N and 90°–150° W. For the CP ENSO events, we adopt the ENSO Modoki index (EMI) defined by Ashok et al. (2007) as:
Here \(SSTA_{A}\), \(SSTA_{B}\) and \(SSTA_{C}\) represent the averaged SSTAs over region A (10° S–10° N, 165° E–140° W), B (15° S–5° N, 110° W–70° W), and C (10° S–20° N, 125° E–145° E), respectively. These two indexes (with a correlation coefficient of − 0.34) in the CESM can basically represent the slightly negative correlation between the observational Niño 3 index and EMI (with a correlation coefficient of − 0.33).
3 Deterministic prediction skill of the two flavors of ENSO
Figure 1 presents the ACC (solid lines) and persistence (dashed lines) skills of the forecast ensemble mean Niño 3 index (blue lines) and EMI (red lines) from 1881 to 2017 as a function of lead time. Generally, the ACC skills for the two flavors of ENSO drop with increasing lead time as expected. Our ensemble system has considerable high prediction skill for both EP ENSO and CP ENSO. The effective predictive skill (ACC > 0.5) extends for 7 and 6 months for the EP ENSO and CP ENSO, respectively. The ACC skill of the Niño 3 index is almost always higher than that of the EMI at all lead times. This indicates that the EP ENSO is more predictable than the CP ENSO in the CESM model, which is consistent with the results based on an intermediate model (Zheng and Yu 2017). For the EP ENSO, the model forecast is obviously superior to the persistence forecast. Whereas the ACC is more skillful than the persistence skill for lead times longer than 3 months for the CP ENSO, while the model forecast is worse than the persistence skill at lead times of 1, 2 and 12 month. The possible reason for this is that the CP ENSO is more sensitive to the initial shock and has a lower prediction skill than persistence skill at the beginning of the forecast. In addition, model bias may also affect the prediction for the two flavors of ENSO. Figure 2a presents the difference of the climatic SST between the control run of the CESM and the observations. There are notable warm SST bias in the tropical Pacific Ocean, which indicates a weaker west–east SST gradient along the equator, and results in a weaker strength of Niño 3 index and EMI than the corresponding observations. The difference in the variances between the simulated and observational Niño 3 index (DMI) is − 0.21 (− 0.22). The warm SST bias also affect the smaller predicted variances of the Niño 3 index (Fig. 2b) and EMI (Fig. 2c) as compared with the observation for all lead times, especially for the long lead times and CP ENSO. The CP ENSO suffers from more model bias may also be reflected by its higher persistence skill than prediction skill at long lead time, which also indicates that there are more improvements to be made for the prediction of the CP ENSO with the CESM. More interestingly, the persistence skill of the EMI is higher than that of the Niño 3 index after 4 months lead. These results are consistent with those of Yang and Jiang (2014) based on version 2 of the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, which showed that the EMI is more persistent than the Niño 3 index.
Figure 3 presents the ACC skill for the Niño 3 index (Fig. 3a) and EMI (Fig. 3b) as a function of the target month for different initial conditions, in order to examine the seasonal variations of the prediction skills for the two flavors of ENSO. There are pronounced SPB phenomena for both the EP ENSO and CP ENSO, with an obvious decay in the prediction skill across the spring season for all start months. The predictions started in January and October exhibit a more marked decline in their skills than the skill of the predictions initiated in April and July for the two flavors of ENSO. However, the SPB is more obvious for the CP ENSO than the EP ENSO. In detail, the effective predictive skill (ACC > 0.5) is 6 months for the EP ENSO and 5 months for the CP ENSO for predictions starting in January. When the predictions start in April, the effective prediction skills for the EP ENSO and CP ENSO are 11 and 10 months, respectively.
Previous studies have shown that the predictability of the EP ENSO has undergone a significant interdecadal variation in intermediate (Chen et al. 2004; Zheng et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2010) and hybrid coupled models (Tang et al. 2008a; Deng and Tang 2009; Tang and Deng 2011). This is also the case for the CGCM ensemble prediction system, as shown in Fig. 4. There is relatively higher prediction skill from 1961 to 2017 and lower prediction skill occurs before 1960 for both flavors of ENSO. These periods of high and low prediction skills for the EP ENSO are generally consistent with previous results from the intermediate and hybrid coupled modes. However, the periods of the highest and lowest prediction skills are different for the two flavors of ENSO. Specifically, the highest (lowest) prediction skills occur during 1981–2000 (1921–1940) for the EP ENSO, but during 2001–2017 (1941–1960) for the CP ENSO. Figure 5 presents the ACC skills for the Niño 3 index and EMI (blue lines) with running window of 20 years, averaged over 1–12 lead month. The ACC skill of the EP ENSO is generally high than that of the CP ENSO, indicating that the EP ENSO is more predictable than the CP ENSO in the CESM ensemble forecast system during the past 137 years. The higher ACC skills occur after 1960 for both flavors of ENSO. However, there are some differences in the variations of ACC skills between the EP ENSO and CP ENSO. The ACC of the EP ENSO decreases from 1890 to 1930 and increase after 1930. In contrast, the ACC of the CP ENSO exhibits decreasing trends in 1881–1930 and 1940–1960, and increasing trends in 1930–1940 and after 1960. Figures 3 and 4 indicate that the prediction skills for the two flavors of ENSO both undergo remarkable interdecadal variations in the CESM, with relatively higher (lower) predictability before (after) the 1960s. Apparently, this can not be simply explained by the improvement in data quality or growing number of ocean observations in recent years. For the EP ENSO, there is relative high skill during 1881–1920 (ACC > 0.5), which actually has insufficient observations.
As reported in previous studies (Chen et al. 2004; Tang et al. 2008a, b, c; Kumar and Chen 2015), one possible reason for the high skill may be the variation of the ENSO signal intensity (red lines in Fig. 5), as these variances mimic the low-frequency variability of the prediction skill for both types of ENSO. For the EP ENSO (Fig. 5a), the variation of its signal strength is significantly correlated with the variation in the depth of the thermocline in the eastern Pacific Ocean (green line, with a correlation coefficient of 0.89), which represents the strength of the thermocline feedback and plays the leading role for the EP ENSO. Strong variations of the thermocline in the eastern Pacific Ocean are associated with a strong thermocline feedback, which results in strong EP ENSO signal variability and its high prediction skill. For the CP ENSO (Fig. 5b), the variation of its signal strength is highly negatively correlated with the warm water volume (WWV; volume of water with temperatures > 20 °C from 5° S–5° N and 120°–280° E) in the tropical Pacific Ocean (green line), with a correlation coefficient of − 0.78. The background SST in the tropical Pacific Ocean presents an increasing cold tongue mode due to global warming (Zhang et al. 2010; Li et al. 2015a, b, 2017, 2019, 2021), which is characterized by cooling in the eastern equatorial Pacific and warming elsewhere in the tropical Pacific (Cane et al. 1997; Karnauskas et al. 2009; Compo and Sardeshmukh 2010; Zhang et al. 2010; Solomon and Newman 2012; Funk and Hoell 2015). This corresponds to vigorous upwelling of cold water in the eastern equatorial Pacific and a decrease in the WWV and after 1950 (green line in Fig. 4b). This background state change reflects a weakened Bjerknes feedback intensity that suppresses the growth of SSTAs in the eastern equatorial Pacific, which finally lead to more frequent of CP ENSO events (Li et al. 2017). The increased occurrence of the CP ENSO indicates a strong variation of its signal, which favors its high prediction skill. In summary, the increased frequency of the two flavors of ENSO events provide strong additional information compared with the climatological prediction, which lead to larger predictability and high prediction skill. We further investigate this in the next section.
4 Potential predictability of the two flavors of ENSO
Potential predictability can reveal the upper limitation of the prediction skill, and qualitatively measuring the possible improvement room of the skill in an ensemble prediction system. Figure 6a presents the information-based (\(R_{MI}\)) and variance-based (\(R_{STR}\)) potential predictability measures as functions of lead time for the Niño 3 index (red line) and EMI (blue line). Both potential predictability metrics decrease with lead time for the two flavors of ENSO, indicating that the predictability declines with lead time for both the EP ENSO and CP ENSO. However, the potential predictability of the EP ENSO is always higher than that of the CP ENSO at all lead times, irrespective of the predictability metric. This explains why the EP ENSO is more predictable than the CP ENSO as shown in Fig. 1. Figure 6a shows that the information-based potential predictability measure is higher than the variance-based metric for both flavors of ENSO, especially for long lead times and the CP ENSO. This difference may be the consequence of the latter only measures the linear statistical dependence between the ensemble mean prediction and the perfect observation, whereas the former includes more information than the later according to Eqs. (7)–(8). (Yang et al. 2012; Tang et al. 2013). Therefore, the variance-based potential predictability somewhat underestimates the intrinsic limit of predictability, especially for the CP ENSO, and the information-based potential predictability is more suitable for evaluating the predictability in an ensemble prediction system. Unless otherwise stated, the potential correlation (R) used thereinafter is \(R_{MI}\). Given that the averaged RE for all the individual predictions is equal to MI (DelSole 2004; DelSole and Tippett 2007; Tang et al. 2013) and the RE includes the SC and DC, the potential predictability \(R_{MI}\) can also be derived from these two components. The SC has a greater contribution to the potential predictability than the DC for both flavors of ENSO, particularly for the CP ENSO and long lead times (Fig. 6b).
The discussion in Sect. 3 showed that the actual prediction skills for the two flavors of ENSO have seasonal and interdecadal variations. Two important questions that arise from this are: how does the potential predictability behave? And what control those behaviors? To address these issues, we calculated another information-based potential predictability measure (RE) for the Niño 3 index and EMI. Unlike R and MI that quantify the overall potential predictability, the RE measures the potential predictability of each prediction. The averaged RE for all individual predictions is equal to the MI, and also related to R according to Eq. (8). The RE is derived from two components: SC and DC. There are significant linear relationships between the RE and SC for the two flavors of ENSO (Fig. 7a, b), with correlation coefficients of 0.79 and 0.93 for the EP ENSO and CP ENSO, respectively. In contrast, the relationships between DC and RE are less significant whether for the EP ENSO or the CP ENSO (Fig. 7c, d). This indicates that the SC has a greater contribution to the variability of RE than the DC for two flavors of ENSO. A larger SC usually provides more additional information and corresponds to a higher potential predictability (RE), especially for the CP ENSO.
Figure 8 presents the relationships between RE and C for all lead times. Most predictions have a small contribution, or even a negative contribution to the ACC. Large values of RE typically correspond to large C, while the variability of C at low values of RE is no rules. This “triangle” relationship between potential predictability and the deterministic prediction skill depends mainly on the SC contribution. This further indicates that a prediction with larger SC corresponds to large potential predictability and makes high contribution to the deterministic prediction skill for both flavors of ENSO.
Furthermore, we examined the seasonal variability of the potential correlation (R), SC and DC. There is marked decline in R (Fig. 9a, d) during the boreal spring for both flavors of ENSO, and the rate of decline for the CP ENSO is sharper than that of the EP ENSO. This indicates that there are also SPB phenomena in potential predictability for both flavors of ENSO, and the CP ENSO has a more significant SPB than the EP ENSO. The cause of this barrier is primarily due to the seasonal variability of the SC (Fig. 9b, e), which declines sharply in the boreal spring for both flavors of ENSO. However, the DC exhibits no obvious seasonal variability (Fig. 9c, f), especially for the CP ENSO. Therefore, the SC controls the SPB in potential predictability and actual prediction skill for both flavors of ENSO.
In addition, there are also distinct interdecadal variations of the potential predictability for both flavors of ENSO (Figs. 10, 11), and the trends are generally consistent with those of the ACC skills. In general, the potential predictability of the EP ENSO is higher than that of the CP ENSO for all decades. The relatively low predictability occurs from 1890 to 1930 for the EP ENSO (Fig. 10a), but before the 1960s for the CP ENSO (Fig. 11a). The SC variations also determine the interdecadal variations of potential predictability for both flavors of ENSO (Figs. 10b, 11b). The periods with more ENSO events provide large SC, which results in high predictability and good deterministic prediction skill. Compared with the CP ENSO, the DC has a greater contribution to the potential predictability for the EP ENSO at short lead times. The above discussion indicates that the SC determines the variations of potential predictability and deterministic skill on various time scales, especially for the CP ENSO. As such,, the potential predictability is also a suitable indicator of the actual deterministic skill in the CESM, which is consistent with the previous findings in other models (Tang et al. 2008b; Cheng et al. 2011; Xue et al. 2013; Kumar and Chen 2015; Liu et al. 2019).
5 Discussion and conclusions
ENSO is the dominant interannual air–sea interaction climatic mode in the tropical Pacific Ocean. It has worldwide effect as it modulates the atmospheric circulation.. A new type of ENSO, the CP ENSO, has maximum SSTAs in the central Pacific Ocean and is distinctly different from the canonical ENSO in terms of its formation mechanism and climatic effects. The predictability of the two flavors of ENSO is an interesting topic that has received less well attention. A long-term ensemble retrospective prediction provides a convenient way to evaluate the predictability of the ENSO in terms of both the actual prediction skill and potential predictability. In this study, we conducted an ensemble retrospective prediction from 1881 to 2017 with the CESM to evaluate the predictability of the two flavors of ENSO. The CP ENSO has a lower deterministic prediction skill than the EP ENSO. The potential predictability declines with lead time for both flavors of ENSO, and the EP ENSO has a higher upper limit for the prediction skill, and is more predictable than the CP ENSO. The information-based metric is more suitable for evaluating the potential predictability because it measures both the linear and nonlinear statistical dependence between the ensemble mean and a hypothetical observation.
The predictability of both flavors of ENSO undergoes distinct seasonal and interdecadal variations whether in actual skill or potential predictability. The CP ENSO has a more obvious SPB than the EP ENSO. A relatively higher predictability occurs after the1960s for the two flavors of ENSO, but the trends are not synchronized. The highest (lowest) prediction skill occurs during 1981–2000 (1921–1940) for the EP ENSO, but during 2001–2017 (1941–1960) for the CP ENSO. In general, a larger SC corresponds to higher potential predictability, and determines the seasonal and interdecadal variations of predictability for both flavors of ENSO. The SC makes more contribution to the predictability of the CP ENSO as compared with the EP ENSO.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the predictability of the two flavors of ENSO based on long-term retrospective forecasting with t CGCM both in terms of the actual skill and potential predictability. Given that the potential predictability measures the upper limit of the actual prediction, the difference between the ACC and potential correlation (R) indicates the margin improvement in the current prediction. The results of this study show that there is significant scope for improvement in the predictions of the two flavors of ENSO with the CESM, especially for the CP ENSO (Fig. 12). But it should be noted that model-based estimate of predictability may be model dependent because of various model biases. In addition, the quality of the assimilated reanalysis data may be limited by the sparse observations prior to the satellite era. Therefore, further in-depth analysis to validate the different aspects of the model predicted variability, especially for the CP ENSO, needs to be undertaken. The underlying reasons for the limits of the current prediction skill for the two flavors of ENSO also requires further study. Relevant improvement to this limitation in the mode should also be considered in the future.
Data availability
The SODA 2.2.4 data were provided by the SODA group at http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/. The GODAS data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSL, Boulder, Colorado, USA, at https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.godas.html. The ERA-20C and ERA-interim datasets were provided by the ECMWF at https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/browse-reanalysis-datasets.
References
Ashok K, Behera SK, Rao SA et al (2007) El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J Geophys Res 112:C11007
Ashok K, Tam CY, Lee WJ (2009) ENSO Modoki impact on the Southern Hemisphere storm track activity during extended austral winter. Geophys Res Lett 36(36):L12705
Barnston AG, Tippett MK, Ranganathan M, L’Heureux ML (2019) Deterministic skill of ENSO predictions from the North American Multimodel Ensemble. Clim Dyn 53:7215–7234
Behringer D, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation system at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. In: Proceeding of eighth symposium on integrated observing and assimilation systems for atmosphere, oceans. and land surface. American Meteorological Society, Seattle, WA. https://ams.confex.com/ams/
Bellenger H, Guilyardi E, Leloup J, Lengaigne M, Vialard J (2014) ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 42:1999–2018
Bellomo K, Murphy LN, Cane MK, Clement AC, Polvani LM (2018) Historical forcings as main drivers of the Atlantic multidecadal variability in the CESM large ensemble. Clim Dyn 50:3687–3698
Berrisford P, Kallberg P, Kobayashi et al. (2011) The ERA–Interim archive version 2.0. European Centre for Medium–Range Weather Forecasts ERA Tech Rep 1, p 23
Cane MA, Clement AC, Kaplan A, Kushnir Y, Pozdnyakov D, Seager R, Murtugudde R (1997) Twentieth-century sea surface temperature trends. Science 275(5302):957–960
Carton JA, Giese BS (2008) A reanalysis of ocean climate using Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (SODA). Mon Weather Rev 136:2999–3017
Chen D, Cane MA, Kaplan A et al (2004) Predictability of El Nino over the past 148 years. Nature 428:733–736
Cheng YJ, Tang YM, Jackson P, Chen D, Deng Z (2010) Ensemble construction and verification of the probabilistic ENSO prediction in the LDEO5 model. J Clim 23:5476–5479
Cheng YJ, Tang YM, Chen D (2011) Relationship between predictability and forecast skill of ENSO on various time scales. J Geophys Res 116:C12006
Compo GP, Sardeshmukh PD (2010) Removing ENSO-related variations from the climate record. J Clim 23(8):1957–1978
Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of information theory. John Wiley, Hoboken, p 576
DelSole T (2004) Predictability and information theory. Part I: measures of predictability. J Atmos Sci 61:2425–2440
DelSole T (2005) Predictability and information theory. Part II: imperfect forecasts. J Atmos Sci 62:3368–3381
DelSole T, Tippett MK (2007) Predictability: recent insights from information theory. Rev Geophys 45:RG4002
Deng ZW, Tang YM (2009) The retrospective prediction of ENSO from 1881 to 2000 by a hybrid coupled model: (II) interdecadal and decadal variations in predictability. Clim Dyn 32:415–428
Ding H, Newman M, Alexander MA, Wittenberg AT (2019) Diagnosing secular variations in retrospective ENSO seasonal forecast skill using CMIP5 model-analogs. Geophys Res Lett 46:1721–1730
Feng J, Li JP (2011) Influence of El Niño Modoki on spring rainfall over south China. J Geophys Res 116:D13102
Feng J, Li JP (2013) Contrasting impacts of two types of ENSO on the boreal spring Hadley circulation. J Clim 26:4773–4789
Feng J, Li JP, Zheng F et al (2016a) Contrasting impacts of developing phases of two types of El Niño on southern China rainfall. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 94:359–370
Feng J, Zhu JL, Li Y (2016b) Influences of El Niño on aerosol concentrations over eastern China. Atmos Sci Lett 17:422–430
Feng J, Li JP, Zhu JL et al (2017) Simulated contrasting influences of two La Niña Modoki events on aerosol concentrations over eastern China. J Geophys Res Atmos 122:2734–2749
Funk CC, Hoell A (2015) The leading mode of observed and CMIP5 ENSO-residual sea surface temperatures and associated changes in Indo-Pacific climate. J Clim 28:4309–4329
Gao YQ, Liu T, Song XS et al (2020) An extension of LDEO5 model for ENSO ensemble predictions. Clim Dyn 55:2979–2991
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37:407–418
Hendon HH, Lim E, Wang G, Alves O, Hudson D (2009) Prospects for predicting two flavors of El Niño. Geophys Res Lett 36:L19413
Hu JY, Duan WS (2016) Relationship between optimal precursory disturbances and optimally growing initial errors associated with ENSO events: implications to target observations for ENSO prediction. J Geophys Res Oceans 121:2901–2917
Hu JY, Duan WS, Zhou Q (2019) Season-dependent predictability and error growth dynamics for La Niña predictions. Clim Dyn 53:1063–1076
Huang B, Shin C, Shukla J, Marx L, Balmaseda MA, Halder S, Dirmeyer P, Kinter JL III (2017) Reforecasting the ENSO events in the past 57 years (1958–2014). J Clim 30:7669–7693
Hurrell JW, Holland M, Gent PR et al (2013) The community earth system model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:1339–1360
Imada Y, Tatebe H, Ishii M, Chikamoto Y, Kimoto M (2015) Predictability of two types of El Niño assessed using an extended seasonal prediction system by MIROC. Mon Weather Rev 143:4597–4617
Islam SU, Tang Y, Jackson PL (2016) Optimal error growth of South Asian monsoon forecast associated with the uncertainties in the sea surface temperature. Clim Dyn 46:1953–1975
Jeong HI, Lee DY, Ashok K, Ahn JB, Lee JY, Luo JJ, Schemm JK, Hendon HH, Braganza K, Ham YG (2012) Assessment of the APCC coupled MME suite in predicting the distinctive climate impacts of two flavors of ENSO during boreal winter. Clim Dyn 39:475–493
Jiang F, Zhang WJ, Geng X et al (2019) Impact of central Pacific El Nino on Southern China spring precipitation controlled by its longitudinal position. J Clim 32:7823–7836
Joe H (1989) Relative entropy measures of multivariate dependence. J Am Stat Assoc 84:157–164
Johnson SJ et al (2019) SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system. Geosci Model Dev 12:1087–1117
Kao HY, Yu JY (2009) Contrasting Eastern-Pacific and Central-Pacific types of ENSO. J Clim 22:615–632
Karnauskas KB, Seager R, Kaplan A, Kushnir Y, Cane MA (2009) Observed strengthening of the zonal sea surface temperature gradient across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. J Clim 22(16):4316–4321
Kim HM, Webster PJ, Curry JA (2009) Impact of shifting patterns of pacific ocean warming on North Atlantic tropical cyclones. Science 325:77–80
Kirtman BP, Min D et al (2014) The North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME): phase-1 seasonal to interannual prediction, phase-2 toward developing intra-seasonal prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:585–601
Kleeman R, Tang YM, Moore AM (2003) The calculation of climatically relevant singular vectors in the presence of weather noise as applied to the ENSO problem. J Atmos Sci 60:2856–2868
Kug JS, Jin FF, An SI (2009) Two types of El Niño events: cold tongue El Niño and warm pool El Niño. J Clim 22:1499–1515
Kumar A (2009) Finite samples and uncertainty estimates for skill measures for seasonal prediction. Mon Weather Rev 137:2622–2631
Kumar A, Chen M (2015) Inherent predictability, requirements on the ensemble size, and complementarity. Mon Weather Rev 143:3192–3203
Kumar A, Hu Z, Jha B, Peng P (2016) Estimating ENSO predictability based on multi-model hindcasts. Clim Dyn 48:1–13
Lee RW, Tam CY, Sohn SJ, Ahn JB (2018) Predictability of two types of El Niño and their climate impacts in boreal spring to summer in coupled models. Clim Dyn 51:4555–4571
Li Y, Chen XR, Tan J et al (2015a) An ENSO hindcast experiment using CESM. Haiyang Xuebao (in Chinese) 37:39–50
Li Y, Li JP, Zhang WJ, Zhao X, Xie F, Zheng F (2015b) Ocean dynamical processes associated with the tropical Pacific cold tongue mode. J Geophys Res Oceans 120(9):6419–6435
Li Y, Li JP, Zhang WJ, Chen QL, Feng J, Zheng F et al (2017) Impacts of the tropical Pacific cold tongue mode on ENSO diversity under global warming. J Geophys Res Oceans 122(11):8524–8542
Li Y, Chen QL, Liu XR, Li JP, Xing N, Xie F et al (2019) Long-term trend of the tropical Pacific trade winds under global warming and its causes. J Geophys Res Oceans 124:2626–2640
Li XJ, Tang YM, Zhou L et al (2020) Optimal error analysis of MJO prediction associated with uncertainties in sea surface temperature over Indian Ocean. Clim Dyn 54:4331–4350
Li Y, Chen QL, Xing N, Cheng Z, Qi Y, Feng F, Li M (2021) Long-term trend of equatorial Atlantic zonal sea surface temperature gradient linked to the tropical Pacific cold tongue mode under global warming. J Geophys Res Oceans 126(5):1–18
Lin H et al (2020) The Canadian Seasonal to Interannual Prediction System Version 2 (CanSIPSv2). Weather Forecast 35:1317–1343
Liu T, Tang YM, Yang DJ et al (2019) The relationship among probabilistic, deterministic and potential skills in predicting the ENSO for the past 161 years. Clim Dyn 53:6947–6960
Luo JJ, Masson BS, Yamagata T (2008) Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J Clim 21:84–93
MacLachlan C et al (2015) Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system. Quart J R Meteorol Soc 141:1072–1084
Magee AD, Verdon-Kidd DC, Diamond HJ et al (2017) Influence of ENSO, ENSO Modoki, and the IPO on tropical cyclogenesis: a spatial analysis of the southwest Pacific region. Int J Climatol 37:1118–1137
Neale RB, Richter J, Park S, Lauritzen PH, Vavrus SJ, Rasch PJ, Zhang M (2013) The mean climate of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in forced SST and fully coupled experiments. J Clim 26:5150–5168
Qiao FL, Song ZY, Bao Y, Song Y, Shu Q, Huang C, Zhao W (2013) Development and evaluation of an Earth System Model with surface gravity waves. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:4514–4524
Ren HL, Jin FF, Tian B, Scaife AA (2016) Distinct persistence barriers in two types of ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 43:10973–10979
Smith RD et al (2010) The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) reference manual: ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) and Community Earth System Model (CESM). Los Alamos National Laboratory Tech. Rep. LAUR-10-01853, p 141
Solomon A, Newman M (2012) Reconciling disparate twentieth-century Indo-Pacific ocean temperature trends in the instrumental record. Nat Clim Change 2(9):691–699
Song XS, Li XJ, Zhang SW et al (2021) A new nudging scheme for the current operational climate prediction system of the National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center of China. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. (Accepted)
Stickler A, Brönnimann S, Valente MA et al (2014) ERA-CLIM: historical surface and Upper-Air Data for future reanalyses. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:1419–1430
Takaya Y, Yasuda T, Fujii Y et al (2017) Japan Meteorological Agency/Meteorological Research Institute-Coupled Prediction System version 1 (JMA/MRI-CPS1) for operational seasonal forecasting. Clim Dyn 48:313–333
Tang YM, Deng ZW (2011) Bred vector and ENSO predictability in a hybrid coupled model during the period 1881–2000. J Clim 24:298–314
Tang YM, Kleeman R, Miller S (2006) ENSO predictability of a fully coupled GCM model using singular vector analysis. J Clim 19:3361–3377
Tang YM, Deng ZW, Zhou XB et al (2008a) Interdecadal variation of ENSO predictability in multiple models. J Clim 21:4811–4833
Tang YM, Kleeman R, Moore A (2008b) Comparison of information-based measures of forecast uncertainty in ensemble ENSO prediction. J Clim 21:230–247
Tang YM, Lin H, Moore AM (2008c) Measuring the potential predictability of ensemble climate predictions. J Geophys Res Atmos 113:D04108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008804
Tang YM, Chen D, Yang D (2013) Methods of estimating uncertainty of climate prediction and climate change projection. Climate change—realities, impacts over ice cap, sea level and risks. InTech, London
Tang YM, Zhang RH, Liu T et al (2018) Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability study. Natl Sci Rev 5:826–839
Taschetto AS, England MH (2009) El Niño Modoki impacts on Australian rainfall. J Clim 22:3167–3174
Tippett MK, Barnston AG, DelSole T (2010) Comments on “finite samples and uncertainty estimates for skill measures for seasonal prediction.” Mon Weather Rev 138:1487–1493
Wang C, Li C, Mu M, Duan WS (2013) Seasonal modulations of different impacts of two types of ENSO events on tropical cyclone activity in the western North Pacific. Clim Dyn 40:2887–2902
Xie F, Li JP, Tian WS et al (2012) The Signals of El Niño Modoki in the tropical tropopause layer and stratosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 12:5259–5273
Xie F, Li JP, Tian WS et al (2014a) Indo-Pacific warm pool area expansion, Modoki activity, and tropical cold-point Tropopause temperature variations. Sci Rep 4:4552
Xie F, Li JP, Tian WS et al (2014b) The relative impacts of El Niño Modoki, canonical El Niño, and QBO on tropical ozone changes since the 1980s. Environ Res Lett 9:064020
Xie F, Li JP, Tian WS et al (2014c) The impacts of two types of El Niño on global ozone variations in the last three decades. Adv Atmos Sci 31:1113–1126
Xu H, Chen L, Duan WS (2021) Optimally growing initial errors of El Niño events in the CESM. Clim Dyn 56:3739–3815
Xue Y, Cheng MY, Kumar A et al (2013) Prediction skill and bias of tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures in the NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 26:5358–5378
Yang S, Jiang XW (2014) Prediction of eastern and central Pacific ENSO events and their impacts on East Asian climate by the NCEP Climate Forecast System. J Clim 27:4451–4472
Yang DJ, Tang YM, Zhang YC, Yang XQ (2012) Information-based potential predictability of the Asian summer monsoon in a coupled model. J Geophys Res Atmos 117:D03119. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016775
Yao ZX, Tang YM, Lian T et al (2019) Roles of atmospheric physics and model resolution in the simulation of two types of El Niño. Ocean Model 143:101468
Yeh SW, Kug JS, Dewitte B et al (2009) El Niño in a changing climate. Nature 461:511–514
Yu JY, Kao HY (2007) Decadal changes of ENSO persistence barrier in SST and ocean heat content indices: 1958–2001. J Geophys Res 112:D13106
Yu JY, Kao HY, Lee T (2010) Subtropics-related interannual sea surface temperature variability in the central equatorial Pacific. J Clim 23:2869–2884
Zhang WJ, Li JP, Zhao X (2010) Sea surface temperature cooling mode in the Pacific cold tongue. J Geophys Res Oceans 115(C12):C12042
Zhang SW, Jin FF, Zhao JX et al (2013) The possible influence of a nonconvential El Nino on the severe autumn drought of 2009 in Southwest China. J Clim 26:8392–8405
Zhang SW, Jin FF, and Turner AG (2014) Increasing autumn drought over southern China associated with ENSO regime shift. Geophys Res Lett 41:J–X
Zhang SW, Wang L, Xiang BQ et al (2015) Impacts of two types of La Niña on the NAO during boreal winter. Clim Dyn 44:1351–1366
Zhang SW, Song CY, Wang H, Jiang H, Du L (2018) Evaluation of the hindcasting main SSTA modes of the global key regions based on the CESM forecasting system (in Chinese). Haiyang Xuebao 40:18–30
Zhang SW, Jiang H, Wang H (2019) Assessment of the sea surface temperature predictability based on multimodel hindcasts. Weather Forecast 34:1965–1977
Zheng F, Yu JY (2017) Contrasting the skills and biases of deterministic predictions for the two types of El Niño. Adv Atmos Sci 34:1395–1403
Zheng F, Zhu J, Wang H, Zhang RH (2009) Ensemble hindcasts of ENSO events over the past 120 years using a large number of ensembles. Adv Atmos Sci 26:359–372
Zheng F, Fang XH, Yu JY, Zhu J (2014) Asymmetry of the Bjerknes positive feedback between the two types of El Niño. Geophys Res Lett 41:7651–7657
Zhu JS, Kumar A, Lee HC, Wang H (2017) Seasonal predictions using a simple ocean initialization scheme. Clim Dyn 49:3989–4007
Acknowledgements
This research was jointly supported by the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR (Grant QNYC2101), the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (Grant SML2021SP310), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 41690124, and 41690120), the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant 2017YFA0604202), and the Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (Grant 311021001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, T., Song, X. & Tang, Y. The predictability study of the two flavors of ENSO in the CESM model from 1881 to 2017. Clim Dyn 59, 3343–3358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06269-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06269-2