Skip to main content
Log in

The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Agreement between the correction objectives and the instrumentation strategies remains controversial in idiopathic scoliosis. Most studies have focus on the frontal and sagittal plane. The goal of this study was to evaluate the change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation in fused and unfused segments.

Methods

Fourteen patients operated on for idiopathic scoliosis were prospectively included. Fusion and instrumentation were done by posterior approach. All patients had a pre-operative and a 10-day post-operative radiological evaluation with the EOS system. Axial orientation of the vertebrae with special interest to the apical, junctional, and unfused areas was obtained thanks to the reconstruction software.

Results

Mean apical vertebra axial rotation statistically decreased from 21° pre-operatively to 13° post-operatively. But, there were no statistically significant differences between pre-operative and post-operative mean axial intervertebral rotations in the main curve and axial rotation of the non-instrumented lower counter curve.

Conclusions

3D analysis of the spine in standing position is a great advancement for post-operative analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrections. This study confirmed that actual instrumentations are able to achieve “en bloc” 3D correction of the spine but not intervertebral axial rotation correction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H (2006) Objectives for correction and related instrumentation strategies in scoliosis surgery for Lenke curve types 2, 3 and 5. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:315–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Cheriet F, Villemure I, Mathieu PA, Dansereau J (2007) Tridimensional evaluation and optimization of the orthotic treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Sci (Paris) 23(11):904–909. doi:10.1051/medsci/20072311904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Robitaille M, Sarwark JF, Labelle H (2007) Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 27(7):775–781. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31815588d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Clements D, Merola A, Haher T, Lowe T, Newton P, Bridwell KH, Blanke K (2002) Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(6):604–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang X, Liu L, Song Y, Zhou C, Zhou Z, Wang L (2015) Pre- and postoperative spinopelvic sagittal balance in adolescent patients with Lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(2):102–108. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lenke LG (2014) Sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 20(5):512. doi:10.3171/2013.10.SPINE13793, discussion 513-514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borges PA, Ocampos GP, Mancuso Filho JA, Letaif OB, Marcon RM, Cristante AF (2014) The sagital balance in idiopatic and neuromuscular scoliosis. Acta Ortop Bras 22(4):179–182. doi:10.1590/1413-78522014220400949

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2013) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S203–215. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1984) A new technic for segmental spinal osteosynthesis using the posterior approach. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 70(6):489–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M (1988) New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:10–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, Rohmiller M, Marks MC, Bastrom T (2009) Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2147–2150. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181adb35d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER (2004) Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(3):343–349

  13. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(12):1399–1405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robitaille M, Aubin CE, Labelle H (2009) Effects of alternative instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Res 27(1):104–113. doi:10.1002/jor.20654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadoury S, Cheriet F, Beausejour M, Stokes IA, Parent S, Labelle H (2009) A three-dimensional retrospective analysis of the evolution of spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18(1):23–37. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0817-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18(5):593–607. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0913-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2013) Transverse plane 3D analysis of mild scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2862-x

    Google Scholar 

  18. Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Vialle R, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2013) 3D analysis of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2881-7

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ilharreborde B, Dubousset J, Le Huec JC (2014) Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 4):S397–405. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3334-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, Fitoussi F, Presedo A, Pennecot GF, Mazda K (2010) Hybrid constructs for tridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative analysis of universal clamps versus hooks. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(3):306–314. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, Godbout B, Skalli W (2009) 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 31(6):681–687. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pomero V, Mitton D, Laporte S, de Guise JA, Skalli W (2004) Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19(3):240–247. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalifa G, Charpak Y, Maccia C, Fery-Lemonnier E, Bloch J, Boussard JM, Attal M, Dubousset J, Adamsbaum C (1998) Evaluation of a new low-dose digital x-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children. Pediatr Radiol 28(7):557–561. doi:10.1007/s002470050413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J, Kalifa G, Ferey S (2005) A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bull Acad Natl Med 189(2):287–297, discussion 297-300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Skalli W, Kalifa G, Lazennec JY (2007) EOS stereo-radiography system: whole-body simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with very low radiation dose. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93(6 Suppl):141–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, de Guise J, Rivard CH, Poitras B (1995) Peroperative three-dimensional correction of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel-Dubousset procedure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(12):1406–1409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, and patent/licensing arrangements) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurélien Courvoisier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Courvoisier, A., Garin, C., Vialle, R. et al. The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Childs Nerv Syst 31, 2325–2331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2891-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2891-3

Keywords

Navigation