Skip to main content
Log in

Plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 depends on inoculum rate and P-related soil properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the effect of soil P-related properties and inoculum concentration on plant growth promotion by the phytase-producing strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45. The response (shoot fresh weight/Pi content) of a mycorrhizal-independent plant, Chinese cabbage, was evaluated in a soil with well-defined P-related properties. Two inoculum concentrations were evaluated under four P regimes: no P addition, inorganic P, and two levels of phytate. Significant interaction between P regime and bacterial inoculation was found. FZB45 only promoted plant growth and P uptake at the higher rate of phytate, confirming that phytase activity is its major mechanism and that is limited by soil phytate availability. The effect caused by the lower inoculum concentration was superior than that by the higher, suggesting the simultaneous involvement of a direct effect. This effect was confirmed by a soilless test, which showed a hormone-like response. FZB45 produced IAA in vitro, but its role is to be determined. These results demonstrate that soil modulates the performance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in a specific manner, consistent to the mechanisms of action involved. Determination of those mechanisms and their modulating factors helps predict conditions where plant growth promotion will result, an important step in increasing the consistency of PGPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asghar H, Zahir Z, Arshad M, Khaliq A (2002) Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth-promoting activities in Brassica juncea L. Biol Fertility Soils 35:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz T, Habte M (1987) Determining vesicular―arbuscular mycorrhizal effectiveness by monitoring P status of leaf disks. Can J Microbiol 33:1097–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashan Y, de Bashan LE (2005) Fresh-weight measurements of roots provide inaccurate estimates of the effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on root growth: a critical examination. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1795–1804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Celi L, Barberis E (2007) Abiotic reactions of inositol phosphates in soil. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 207–220

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Celi L, Lamacchia S, Marsan FA, Barberis E (1999) Interaction of inositol hexaphosphate on clays: adsorption and charging phenomena. Soil Sci 164:574–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ (1997) Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 24:358–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Vande Broek A, Vanderleyden J (1999) Phytostimulatory effect of Azospirillum brasilense wild type and mutant strains altered in IAA production on wheat. Plant Soil 212:155–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández L, Zalba P, Gómez M, Sagardoy M (2007) Phosphate-solubilization activity of bacterial strains in soil and their effect on soybean growth under greenhouse conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:805–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Findenegg GR, Nelemans JA (1993) The effect of phytase on the availability of P from myo-inositol hexaphosphate (phytate) for maize roots. Plant Soil 154:189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox RL (1981) External phosphorus requirements of crops. In: Dowdy RH (ed) Chemistry in the soil environment. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 223–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox RL, Kamprath EJ (1970) Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphate requirements of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 34:902–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu S, Sun J, Qian L, Li Z (2008) Bacillus phytases: present scenario and future perspectives. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García de Salamone IE, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (2001) Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Can J Microbiol 47:404–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Richardson A, Smith J, Hadobas P, Simpson R (2005a) Limitations to the potential of transgenic Trifolium subterraneum L. plants that exude phytase when grown in soils with a range of organic P content. Plant Soil 278:263–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2005b) Behaviour of plant-derived extracellular phytase upon addition to soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:977–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Simpson RJ, Hadobas PA, Richardson AE (2005c) Expression of a fungal phytase gene in Nicotiana tabacum improves phosphorus nutrition of plants grown in amended soils. Plant Biotechnol J 3:129–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Turner BL, Gregory PJ, Cade-Menun BJ, Richardson AE (2006) Depletion of organic phosphorus from Oxisols in relation to phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Sci 57:47–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Quiquampoix H, Simpson RJ, Richardson AE (2007a) Interactions between phytases and soil constituents: implications for the hydrolisis of inositol phosphates. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. CAB International, Oxfordshire, pp 221–241

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • George TS, Simpson RJ, Gregory PJ, Richardson AE (2007b) Differential interaction of Aspergillus niger and Peniophora lycii phytases with soil particles affects the hydrolysis of inositol phosphates. Soil Biol Biochem 39:793–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Todorovic B, Czarny J, Cheng Z, Duan J, McConkey B (2007) Promotion of plant growth by bacterial ACC deaminase. Crit Rev Plant Sci 26:227–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein A, Krishnaraj P (2007) Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms vs. phosphate mobilizing microorganisms: what separates a phenotype from a trait? In: First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization, pp. 203–213

  • Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grynspan F, Cheryan M (1983) Calcium phytate: effect of pH and molar ratio on in vitro solubility. J Am Oil Chem Soc 60:1761–1764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gyaneshwar P, Naresh Kumar G, Parekh LJ, Poole PS (2002) Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 245:83–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habte M (2000) Mycorrhizal fungi and plant nutrition. In: Silva JA, Uchida R (eds) Plant nutrient management in Hawaii’s soils, approaches for tropical and subtropical agriculture. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa, Hawaii. pp. 127–131

  • Huang X-L, Chen Y, Shenker M (2005) Rapid whole-plant bioassay for phosphorus phytoavailability in soils. Plant Soil 271:365–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hue NV, Ikawa H, Huang X (2000) Predicting soil phosphorus requirements. In: Silva JA, Uchida R (eds) Plant nutrient management in Hawaii’s soils, approaches for tropical and subtropical agriculture. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Manoa. pp. 95–99

  • Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R (2007) Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol Plant-Microb Interact 20:619–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss EE, Makarewicz O, Farouk A, Rosner K, Greiner R, Bochow H, Richter T, Borriss R (2002) Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect. Microbiology 148:2097–2109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joo G-J, Kim Y-M, Kim J-T, Rhee I-K, Kim J-H, Lee I-J (2005) Gibberellins-producing rhizobacteria increase endogenous gibberellins content and promote growth of red peppers. J Microbiol 43:510–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorquera M, Hernández M, Rengel Z, Marschner P, de la Luz MM (2008) Isolation of culturable phosphobacteria with both phytate-mineralization and phosphate-solubilization activity from the rhizosphere of plants grown in a volcanic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 44:1025–1034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Ryu C-M, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs B, Höding B, Kübart S, Workie MA, Junge H, Schmiedeknecht G, Grosch R, Bochow H, Hevesi M (1998) Use of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent. I. Activities and characterization of Bacillus subtilis strains. J Plant Dis Protect 105:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wu Z, Li W, Yan R, Li L, Li J, Li Y, Li M (2007) Growth promoting effect of a transgenic Bacillus mucilaginosus on tobacco planting. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1120–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz O, Dubrac S, Msadek T, Borriss R (2006) Dual role of the PhoP P response regulator: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 phytase gene transcription is directed by positive and negative interactions with the phyC promoter. J Bacteriol 188:6953–6965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz O, Neubauer S, Preusse C, Borriss R (2008) Transition state regulator AbrB inhibits transcription of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 phytase through binding at two distinct sites located within the extended phyC promoter region. J Bacteriol 190:6467–6474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathre DE, Cook RJ, Callan NW (1999) From discovery to use: traversing the world of commercializing biocontrol agents for plant disease control. Plant Dis 83:972–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney EJ, Ullah AHJ (2007) Phytases: attributes, catalytic mechanisms and applications. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 97–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PS, Logan TJ, Sharpley AN, Sommers LE, Tabatabai MA, Yuan TL (1984) Interlaboratory comparison of a standardized phosphorus adsorption procedure. J Environ Qual 13:591–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh B-C, Chang BS, Park K-H, Ha N-C, Kim H-K, Oh B-H, Oh T-K (2001) Calcium-dependent catalytic activity of a novel phytase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DS11. Biochemistry 40:9669–9676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose DM, Glick BR (2003) Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol Plant 118:10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE (2001) Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:897–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson A (2007) Making microorganisms mobilize soil phosphorus. In: First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization. pp. 85–90

  • Richardson AE, Hadobas PA (1997) Soil isolates of Pseudomonas spp. that utilize inositol phosphates. Can J Microbiol 43:509–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE, O'Hara CP, Simpson RJ (2001) Utilization of phosphorus by pasture plants supplied with myo-inositol hexaphosphate is enhanced by the presence of soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil 229:47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE, George TS, Jakobsen I, Simpson RJ (2007) Plant utilization of inositol phosphates. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 242–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson A, Barea J-M, McNeill A, Prigent-Combaret C (2009) Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:305–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar JC, Marschner H (1995) Dual inoculation with Aspergillus fumigatus and Glomus mosseae enhances biomass production and nutrient uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) supplied with organic phosphorus as Na-phytate. Plant Soil 173:97–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Papházy MJ, Haygarth PM, McKelvie ID (2002) Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:449–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Unno Y, Okubo K, Wasaki J, Shinano T, Osaki M (2005) Plant growth promotion abilities and microscale bacterial dynamics in the rhizosphere of Lupin analysed by phytate utilization ability. Environ Microbiol 7:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vilain S, Luo Y, Hildreth MB, Brozel VS (2006) Analysis of the life cycle of the soil saprophyte Bacillus cereus in liquid soil extract and in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4970–4977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yip W, Wang L, Cheng C, Wu W, Lung S, Lim B-L (2003) The introduction of a phytase gene from Bacillus subtilis improved the growth performance of transgenic tobacco. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310:1148–1154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Rainer Borriss, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt Universität, Berlin for providing the bacterial strain and Dr. Edzard van Santen, Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University for his valuable advising on statistical analysis. We also acknowledge William D. Fowler for review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilo A. Ramírez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramírez, C.A., Kloepper, J.W. Plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 depends on inoculum rate and P-related soil properties. Biol Fertil Soils 46, 835–844 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0488-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0488-2

Keywords

Navigation