Abstract
The operation and aerodynamic performance of a helicopter rotor is strongly affected by the structure of its wake, in particular regarding vortex–vortex interactions of hovering rotors. Rotor simulations using modern computational methods have the potential to capture high levels of detail, which recently triggered discussions of secondary vortex braids entangling the primary tip vortices. These structures are highly dependent on the numerical settings and need experimental validation. The current work investigates the wake of a subscale rotor in ground effect by time-resolved and volumetric flow-field measurements using the “Shake-The-Box” technique. Both the Lagrangian tracks of the flow tracers and the derived gradient-based vortex criteria clearly verify the existence of secondary vortices. A post-processing scheme is applied to isolate these vortices in larger data sets. No distinct spatial organization of the structures was observed, but a slightly preferred sense of rotation which agrees to the shear of the wake swirl. The secondary structures were created shortly downstream of the rotor blades, starting at wake ages of approximately \(75^\circ \).
Graphic abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Figa_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig1_HTML.png)
Modified from Jain (2018)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig2_HTML.png)
Modified from Martin and Leishman (2002)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig7_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig20_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig21_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig22_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00348-019-2807-1/MediaObjects/348_2019_2807_Fig23_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- DLR:
-
German Aerospace Center
- HFSB:
-
Helium-filled soap bubbles
- LED:
-
Light-emitting diode
- PIV:
-
Particle image velocimetry
- ppc:
-
Particles per cell
- SA-DES:
-
Spalart–Allmaras Detached Eddy Simulation
- STB:
-
Shake-The-Box
- c :
-
Chord length, \(c={0.061}\hbox { m}\)
- \(C_\mathrm{T}\) :
-
Thrust coeff., \(C_\mathrm{T} = T/(\rho (2\pi Rf)^2 \pi R^2)\)
- f :
-
Rotor frequency, \(f={20.83}\hbox { HZ}\)
- H :
-
Rotor plane height, m
- \(k\) :
-
Norm. turbulent kinetic energy, Eq. (1)
- \(k_x, k_y, k_z\) :
-
Cartesian components of \(k\), Eq. (2)
- Q :
-
Q-criterion, \({1/\mathrm{s}}^2\)
- \(Q_{{\text{ neg }}}\) :
-
Negative secondary vortex criterion, \({1/\mathrm{s}}^2\)
- \(Q_{{\text{ pos }}}\) :
-
Positive secondary vortex criterion, \({1/\mathrm{s}}^2\)
- \(Q_{{\text{ tip }}}\) :
-
Tip vortex criterion, \({1/\mathrm{s}}^2\)
- R :
-
Rotor radius, \(R={0.775}\hbox { m}\)
- T :
-
Rotor thrust, N
- u, v, w :
-
Cartesian velocity components, m/s
- \(V_\mathrm{h}\) :
-
Hover-induced velocity, \(V_\mathrm{h} = \sqrt{T/(2\rho \pi R^2)}\), m/s
- \(V_{{\text{ tip }}}\) :
-
Blade tip velocity, \(V_{{\text{ tip }}}= {101.4}\,\text {m/s}\)
- x, y, z :
-
Cartesian coordinate system, m
- \(\varDelta \) :
-
Difference between two values
- \(\rho \) :
-
Air density, \(\rho ={1.18}\,\hbox {kg/m}^2\)
- \(\sigma \) :
-
Rotor solidity, \(\sigma = 0.05\)
- \(\varPsi \) :
-
Azimuth angle, \(^\circ \)
- \(\varPsi _\mathrm{w}\) :
-
Tip vortex wake age, \(^\circ \)
- \(\varvec{\omega }\) :
-
Vorticity vector, 1/s
- \(\nabla \) :
-
Nabla operator
- \(\overline{\;\;}\) :
-
Time-averaged value
- \( ' \) :
-
Time-varying fluctuation value
References
Abras JN, Narducci R, Hariaharan N (2019) Wake breakdown of high-fidelity simulations of a rotor in hover. In: AIAA Scitech forum, San Diego, CA, USA, Jan 7–11 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0593
Bauknecht A, Ewers B, Schneider O, Raffel M (2017) Blade tip vortex measurements on actively twisted rotor blades. Exp Fluids 58(5):49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2312-3
Bernal LP, Roshko A (1986) Streamwise vortex structure in plane mixing layers. J Fluid Mech 170:499–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211208600099X
Bosbach J, Kühn M, Wagner C (2009) Large scale particle image velocimetry with helium filled soap bubbles. Exp Fluids 46(3):539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0579-0
Caridi GCA, Sciacchitano A, Scarano F (2017) Helium-filled soap bubbles for vortex core velocimetry. Exp Fluids 58(9):130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2415-x
Chaderjian NM (2012) Advances in rotor performance and turbulent wake simulation using DES and adaptive mesh refinement. In: 7th international conference on computational fluid dynamics, Big Island, HI, USA, Jul 9–13, 2012
Chaderjian NM, Buning PG (2011) High resolution Navier–Stokes simulation of rotor wakes. In: 67th Annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, May 3–5, 2011
Egolf TA, Hariharan N, Narducci R, Reed E (2017) AIAA standardized hover simulation: Hover performance prediction status and outstanding issues. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA, Jan 9–13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1429
Gao Y, Liu C (2018) Rortex and comparison with eigenvalue-based vortex identification criteria. Phys Fluids 30(8):085107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5040112
Gesemann S, Huhn F, Schanz D, Schröder A (2016) From noisy particle tracks to velocity, acceleration and pressure fields using B-splines and penalties. In: 18th International symposium on the application of laser and imaging techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, July 4–7, 2016
Gibeau B, Koch CR, Ghaemi S (2018) Secondary instabilities in the wake of an elongated two-dimensional body with a blunt trailing edge. J Fluid Mech 846:578–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.285
Gray RB (1992) Vortex modeling for rotor aerodynamics—the 1991 Alexander A. Nikolsky Lecture. J Am Helicopter Soc 37(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.37.3
Hariharan N, Egolf A, Sankar L (2014) Simulation of rotor in hover: current state and challenges. In: 52nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, Jan 13–17, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0041
Heineck, JT, Yamauchi, GK, Wadcock, AJ, Lourenco, L, Abrego, AI (2000) Application of three-component PIV to a hovering rotor wake. In: 56th Annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Alexandria, VA, USA, May 2–4, 2000
Huhn F, Schanz D, Gesemann S, Dierksheide U, van de Meerendonk R, Schröder A (2017) Large-scale volumetric flow measurement in a pure thermal plume by dense tracking of helium-filled soap bubbles. Exp Fluids 58(9):116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2390-2
Jain R (2018) Sensitivity study of high-fidelity hover predictions on the Sikorsky S-76 rotor. J Aircr 55(1):78–88. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034076
Kindler K, Mulleners K, Richard H, Van der Wall BG, Raffel M (2011) Aperiodicity in the near-field of full-scale rotor blade tip vortices. Exp Fluids 50(6):1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1016-8
Kutz BM, Keßler M, Krämer E (2013) Experimental and numerical examination of a helicopter hovering in ground effect. CEAS Aeronaut J 4(4):397–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-013-0084-x
Lee TE, Leishman JG, Ramasamy M (2010) Fluid dynamics of interacting blade tip vortices with a ground plate. J Am Helicopter Soc 55(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.55.022005
Leweke T, Le Dizès S, Williamson CHK (2016) Dynamics and instabilities of vortex pairs. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 48:507–541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034558
Light JS (1993) Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect. J Am Helicopter Soc 38(2):34–42. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.38.34
Martin PB, Leishman JG (2002) Trailing vortex measurements in the wake of a hovering rotor blade with various tip shapes. In: 58th Annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Montréal, Canada, June 11–13, 2002
Mula SM, Stephenson JH, Tinney CE, Sirohi J (2013) Dynamical characteristics of the tip vortex. Exp Fluids 54(10):1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1600-9
Novara M, Schanz D, Geisler R, Gesemann S, Voss C, Schröder A (2019) Multi-exposed recordings for 3D lagrangian particle tracking with multi-pulse Shake-The-Box. Exp Fluids 60(3):44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2692-7
Ohanian CV, McCauley GJ, Savaş Ö (2012) A visual study of vortex instabilities in the wake of a rotor in hover. J Am Helicopter Soc 57(4):1–8. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.57.042005
Öhrle C, Schäferlein U, Keßler M, Krämer E (2018) Higher-order simulations of a compound helicopter using adaptive mesh refinement. In: 74th Annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, AZ, USA, May 14–17, 2018
Potsdam M (2014) UH-60A rotor tip vortex prediction and comparison to full-scale wind tunnel measurements. In: 70th Annual forum of the American Helicopter Society, Montréal, Canada, May 20–22, 2014
Quaranta HU, Bolnot H, Leweke T (2015) Long-wave instability of a helical vortex. J Fluid Mech 780:687–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.479
Raffel M, Bauknecht A, Ramasamy M, Yamauchi GK, Heineck JT, Jenkins LN (2017) Contributions of particle image velocimetry to helicopter aerodynamics. AIAA J 55(9):2859–2874. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055571
Ramasamy M, Johnson B, Leishman JG (2009) Turbulent tip vortex measurements using dual-plane stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. AIAA J 47(8):1826–1840. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39202
Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A, Wieneke B, Novara M (2013) Non-uniform optical transfer functions in particle imaging: calibration and application to tomographic reconstruction. Meas Sci Technol 24:024009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/2/024009
Schanz D, Gesemann S, Schröder A (2016) Shake-The-Box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities. Exp Fluids 57(5):70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2157-1
Schwarz C, Bauknecht A, Mailänder S, Raffel M (2019a) Wake characterization of a free-flying model helicopter in ground effect. J Am Helicopter Soc 64(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.64.012010
Schwarz C, Bauknecht A, Wolf CC, Coyle A, Raffel M (2019b) A full-scale rotor-wake investigation of a free-flying helicopter in ground effect using BOS and PIV. In: 75th Annual forum of the vertical flight society, Philadelphia, PA, USA, May 13–16, 2019
Van der Wall B, Richard H (2006) Analysis methodology for 3C-PIV data of rotary wing vortices. Exp Fluids 40(5):798–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0117-x
Wieneke B (2008) Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 45(4):549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-008-0521-5
Acknowledgements
The studies were conducted as a part of the DLR project “FAST-Rescue”. The authors would like to thank Markus Krebs, Janos Agocs, Andreas Goerttler, Felix Wienke, and Uwe Dierksheide for their support during the measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, C.C., Schwarz, C., Kaufmann, K. et al. Experimental study of secondary vortex structures in a rotor wake. Exp Fluids 60, 175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2807-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2807-1