Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pudendal nerve block in HDR-brachytherapy patients: do we really need general or regional anesthesia?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In male patients, the pudendal block was applied only in rare cases as a therapy of neuralgia of the pudendal nerve. We compared pudendal nerve block (NPB) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) in order to perform a pain-free high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in a former pilot study in 2010. Regarding this background, in the present study, we only performed the bilateral perineal infiltration of the pudendal nerve.

Methods

In 25 patients (71.8 ± 4.18 years) suffering from a high-risk prostate carcinoma, we performed the HDR-brachytherapy with the NPB. The perioperative compatibility, the subjective feeling (German school marks principle 1–6), subjective pain (VAS 1–10) and the early postoperative course (mobility, complications) were examined.

Results

All patients preferred the NPB. There was no change of anesthesia form necessary. The expense time of NPB was 10.68 ± 2.34 min. The hollow needles (mean 24, range 13–27) for the HDR-brachytherapy remained on average 79.92 ± 12.41 min. During and postoperative, pain feeling was between 1.4 ± 1.08 and 1.08 ± 1.00. A transurethral 22 French Foley catheter was left in place for 6 h. All patients felt the bladder catheter as annoying, but they considered postoperative mobility as more important as complete lack of pain. The subjective feeling was described as 2.28 ± 0.74. Any side effects or complications did not appear.

Conclusions

Bilateral NPB is a safe and effective analgesic option in HDR-brachytherapy and can replace CSE. It offers the advantage of almost no impaired mobility of the patient and can be performed by the urologist himself. Using transrectal ultrasound guidance, the method can be learned quickly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schenck M, Krause K, Schwandtner R, Haase I, Fluehs D, Friedrich J, Jaeger T, Boergermann C, Ruebben H, Stuschke M (2006) High-dose rate brachytherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Urologe A 45(6):715–716, 718–722. doi:10.1007/s00120-006-1083-x

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schenck M, Kliner SJ, Achilles M, Schenck C, Berkovic K, Ruebben H, Stuschke M (2010) Pudendal block or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma? Aktuelle Urol 41(1):43–51. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1224722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scudamore JH, Yates MJ (1966) Pudendal block—a misnomer? Lancet 1(7427):23–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niesel HC, Eilingsfeld T (1994) The extent of spinal anesthesia depends on the amount of he injected local anesthetic–fact or fiction? Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 29(7):427–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L (2006) Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(3):600–605. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagen NA (1993) Sharp, shooting neuropathic pain in the rectum or genitals: pudendal neuralgia. J Pain Symptom Manage 8(7):496–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Labat JJ, Robert R, Bensignor M, Buzelin JM (1990) Neuralgia of the pudendal nerve. Anatomo-clinical considerations and therapeutical approach. J Urol (Paris) 96(5):239–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robert R, Prat-Pradal D, Labat JJ, Bensignor M, Raoul S, Rebai R, Leborgne J (1998) Anatomic basis of chronic perineal pain: role of the pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 20(2):93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Birch BR, Gelister JS, Parker CJ, Chave H, Miller RA (1991) Transurethral resection of prostate under sedation and local anesthesia (sedoanalgesia). Experience in 100 patients. Urology 38(2):113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Birch BR, Miller RA (1991) Birch-Miller electrotest needle: aid to local anesthetic endoscopic surgery. Urology 38(1):64–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chander J, Gupta U, Mehra R, Ramteke VK (2000) Safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate under sedoanalgesia. BJU Int 86(3):220–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Akalin Z, Mungan NA, Basar H, Aydoganli L, Cengiz T (1998) Transurethral resection of the prostate and laser prostatectomy under local anesthesia. Eur Urol 33(2):202–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigues AO, Machado MT, Wroclawski ER (2002) Prostate innervation and local anesthesia in prostate procedures. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 57(6):287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amarenco G, Savatovsky I, Budet C, Perrigot M (1989) Perineal neuralgia and Alcock’s canal syndrome. Ann Urol (Paris) 23(6):488–492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robert R, Labat JJ, Bensignor M, Glemain P, Deschamps C, Raoul S, Hamel O (2005) Decompression and transposition of the pudendal nerve in pudendal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial and long-term evaluation. Eur Urol 47(3):403–408. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mauillon J, Thoumas D, Leroi AM, Freger P, Michot F, Denis P (1999) Results of pudendal nerve neurolysis-transposition in twelve patients suffering from pudendal neuralgia. Dis Colon Rectum 42(2):186–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shafik A, el-Sherif M, Youssef A, Olfat ES (1995) Surgical anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its clinical implications. Clin Anat 8(2):110–115. doi:10.1002/ca.980080205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng PW, Tumber PS (2008) Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for patients with chronic pelvic pain—a description of techniques and review of literature. Pain Physician 11(2):215–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thoumas D, Leroi AM, Mauillon J, Muller JM, Benozio M, Denis P, Freger P (1999) Pudendal neuralgia: CT-guided pudendal nerve block technique. Abdom Imaging 24(3):309–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gruber H, Kovacs P, Piegger J, Brenner E (2001) New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: topographic basics. Dis Colon Rectum 44(9):1376–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kovacs P, Gruber H, Piegger J, Bodner G (2001) New, simple, ultrasound-guided infiltration of the pudendal nerve: ultrasonographic technique. Dis Colon Rectum 44(9):1381–1385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerheuser F, Roth A (2007) Epidural anesthesia. Anaesthesist 56(5):499–523; quiz 524–496. doi:10.1007/s00101-007-1181-1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has direct or indirect financial incentive associated with publishing the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Schenck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schenck, M., Schenck, C., Rübben, H. et al. Pudendal nerve block in HDR-brachytherapy patients: do we really need general or regional anesthesia?. World J Urol 31, 417–421 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0987-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0987-x

Keywords

Navigation