Abstract
Development of a network for remote entanglement of quantum processors is an outstanding challenge in quantum information science. We propose and analyze a two-species architecture for remote entanglement of neutral atom quantum computers based on integration of optically trapped atomic qubit arrays with fast optics for photon collection. One of the atomic species is used for atom–photon entanglement, and the other species provides local processing. We compare the achievable rates of remote entanglement generation for two optical approaches: free space photon collection with a lens and a near-concentric, long working distance resonant cavity. Laser cooling and trapping within the cavity remove the need for mechanical transport of atoms from a source region, which allows for a fast repetition rate. Using optimized values of the cavity finesse, remote entanglement generation rates \(> 10^3~\mathrm{s}^{-1}\) are predicted for experimentally feasible parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The equation for C in [46] appears different than our definition, because those authors use \(\kappa , \gamma\) defined as FWHM/2.
References
C. Monroe, R. Raussendorf, A. Ruthven, K.R. Brown, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, J. Kim, Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic interconnects. Phys. Rev. A 89, 022317 (2014)
M. Morgado, S. Whitlock, Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits. AVS Qu. Sci. 3, 021101 (2021)
T.M. Graham, Y. Song, J. Scott, C. Poole, L. Phuttitarn, K. Jooya, P. Eichler, X. Jiang, A. Marra, B. Grinkemeyer, M. Kwon, M. Ebert, J. Cherek, M.T. Lichtman, M. Gillette, J. Gilbert, D. Bowman, T. Ballance, C. Campbell, E.D. Dahl, O. Crawford, N.S. Blunt, B. Rogers, T. Noel, M. Saffman, Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 604, 457–462 (2022)
D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T.T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, M.D. Lukin, A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature 604, 451–456 (2022)
M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313–2363 (2010)
A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H.J. Kimble, D.E. Chang, Exponential improvement in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance’’ in atomic arrays. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031024 (2017)
J.P. Covey, A. Sipahigil, S. Szoke, N. Sinclair, M. Endres, O. Painter, Telecom-band quantum optics with ytterbium atoms and silicon nanophotonics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 034044 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034044
S.G. Menon, K. Singh, J. Borregaard, H. Bernien, Nanophotonic quantum network node with neutral atoms and an integrated telecom interface. New J. Phys. 22, 073033 (2020)
T. Đorđević, P. Samutpraphoot, P.L. Ocola, H. Bernien, B. Grinkemeyer, I. Dimitrova, V. Vuletić, M.D. Lukin, Entanglement transport and a nanophotonic interface for atoms in optical tweezers. Science 373, 1511 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi9917
C.H. Nguyen, A.N. Utama, N. Lewty, K. Durak, G. Maslennikov, S. Straupe, M. Steiner, C. Kurtsiefer, Single atoms coupled to a near-concentric cavity. Phys. Rev. A 96, 031802(R) (2017)
A. Kawasaki, B. Braverman, E. Pedrozo-Peñafiel, C. Shu, S. Colombo, Z. Li, O. Özel, W. Chen, L. Salvi, A. Heinz, D. Levonian, D. Akamatsu, Y. Xiao, V. Vuletić, Geometrically asymmetric optical cavity for strong atom-photon coupling. Phys. Rev. A 99, 013437 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.013437
W. Huie, S.G. Menon, H. Bernien, J.P. Covey, Multiplexed telecommunication-band quantum networking with atom arrays in optical cavities. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043154
J. Volz, M. Weber, D. Schlenk, W. Rosenfeld, J. Vrana, K. Saucke, C. Kurtsiefer, H. Weinfurter, Observation of entanglement of a single photon with a trapped atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 030404 (2006)
S. Ritter, C. Nölleke, C. Hahn, A. Reiserer, A. Neuzner, M. Uphoff, M. Mücke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, G. Rempe, An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities. Nature 484, 195–200 (2012)
M. Uphoff, M. Brekenfeld, G. Rempe, S. Ritter, An integrated quantum repeater at telecom wavelength with single atoms in optical fiber cavities. Appl. Phys. B 122, 46 (2016)
M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, Creating single-atom and single-photon sources from entangled atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 66, 065403 (2002)
M. Saffman, T.G. Walker, Entangling single- and N-atom qubits for fast quantum state detection and transmission. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042302 (2005)
L. Li, Y.O. Dudin, A. Kuzmich, Entanglement between light and an optical atomic excitation. Nature 498, 466 (2013)
D. Petrosyan, K. Mølmer, Deterministic free-space source of single photons using Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123605 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.123605
A. Grankin, P.O. Guimond, D.V. Vasilyev, B. Vermersch, P. Zoller, Free-space photonic quantum link and chiral quantum optics. Phys. Rev. A 98, 043825 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043825
Y. Zeng, P. Xu, X. He, Y. Liu, M. Liu, J. Wang, D.J. Papoular, G.V. Shlyapnikov, M. Zhan, Entangling two individual atoms of different isotopes via Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 160502 (2017)
I.I. Beterov, M. Saffman, Rydberg blockade, Förster resonances, and quantum state measurements with different atomic species. Phys. Rev. A 92, 042710 (2015)
K. Singh, S. Anand, A. Pocklington, J.T. Kemp, H. Bernien, Dual-element, two-dimensional atom array with continuous-mode operation. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011040 (2022)
I.V. Inlek, C. Crocker, M. Lichtman, K. Sosnova, C. Monroe, Multispecies trapped-ion node for quantum networking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 250502 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.250502
M. Kwon, M.F. Ebert, T.G. Walker, M. Saffman, Parallel low-loss measurement of multiple atomic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180504 (2017)
J.P. Covey, A. Sipahigil, M. Saffman, Microwave-to-optical conversion via four-wave-mixing in a cold ytterbium ensemble. Phys. Rev. A 100, 012307 (2019)
A.E.B. Nielsen, K. Mølmer, Deterministic multimode photonic device for quantum-information processing. Phys. Rev. A 81, 043822 (2010)
A.C.J. Wade, M. Mattioli, K. Mølmer, Single-atom single-photon coupling facilitated by atomic-ensemble dark-state mechanisms. Phys. Rev. A 94, 053830 (2016)
I. Cohen, K. Mølmer, Deterministic quantum network for distributed entanglement and quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 98, 030302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.030302
J. Calsamiglia, N. Lütkenhaus, Maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer. Appl. Phys. B 72, 67 (2001)
K.S. Choi, A. Goban, S.B. Papp, S.J. van Enk, H.J. Kimble, Entanglement of spin waves among four quantum memories. Nature 468, 412 (2010)
Y. Yu, F. Ma, X.-Y. Luo, B. Jing, P.-F. Sun, R.-Z. Fang, C.-W. Yang, H. Liu, M.-Y. Zheng, X.-P. Xie, W.-J. Zhang, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, T.-Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, J.-W. Pan, Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres. Nature 578, 240 (2020)
A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K.M. Sliwa, E. Zalys-Geller, S.O. Mundhada, W. Pfaff, L. Frunzio, R.J. Schoelkopf, M.H. Devoret, Robust concurrent remote entanglement between two superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031036 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.031036
D.L. Moehring, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, K.C. Younge, D.N. Matsukevich, L.-M. Duan, C. Monroe, Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance. Nature 449, 68 (2007)
D.N. Matsukevich, P. Maunz, D.L. Moehring, S. Olmschenk, C. Monroe, Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 150404 (2008)
J. Hofmann, M. Krug, N. Ortegel, L. Gérard, M. Weber, W. Rosenfeld, H. Weinfurter, Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms. Science 337, 72–75 (2012)
L. Slodička, G. Hétet, N. Röck, P. Schindler, M. Hennrich, R. Blatt, Atom–atom entanglement by single-photon detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 083603 (2013)
H. Bernien, B. Hensen, W. Pfaff, G. Koolstra, M.S. Blok, L. Robledo, T.H. Taminiau, M. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, L. Childress, R. Hanson, Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres. Nature 497, 86 (2013)
D. Hucul, I.V. Inlek, G. Vittorini, C. Crocker, S. Debnath, S.M. Clark, C. Monroe, Modular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons. Nat. Phys. 11, 37 (2015)
A. Delteil, Z. Sun, Wb. Gao, E. Togan, S. Faelt, A. Imamoğlu, Generation of heralded entanglement between distant hole spins. Nat. Phys. 12, 218 (2016)
W. Rosenfeld, D. Burchardt, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, N. Ortegel, M. Rau, H. Weinfurter, Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017)
R. Stockill, M.J. Stanley, L. Huthmacher, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, A.J. Miller, C. Matthiesen, C. Le Gall, M. Atatüre, Phase-tuned entangled state generation between distant spin qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010503 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.010503
L.J. Stephenson, D.P. Nadlinger, B.C. Nichol, S. An, P. Drmota, T.G. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, J.F. Goodwin, D.M. Lucas, C.J. Ballance, High-rate, high-fidelity entanglement of qubits across an elementary quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 110501 (2020)
M. Pompili, S.L.N. Hermans, S. Baier, H.K.C. Beukers, P.C. Humphreys, R.N. Schouten, R.F.L. Vermeulen, M.J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits. Science 372, 259 (2021)
C. Robens, S. Brakhane, W. Alt, F. Kleißler, D. Meschede, G. Moon, G. Ramola, A. Alberti, High numerical aperture (NA = 0.92) objective lens for imaging and addressing of cold atoms. Opt. Lett. 42, 1043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.42.001043
A. Reiserer, G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015)
The equation for \(C\) in [46] appears different than our definition because those authors use \(\kappa , \gamma\) defined as FWHM\(/2\)
G. Cui, M.G. Raymer, Quantum efficiency of single-photon sources in the cavity-QED strong-coupling regime. Opt. Expr. 13, 9660 (2005)
S. Daiss, S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, E. Distante, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, O. Morin, G. Rempe, A quantum-logic gate between distant quantum-network modules. Science 371, 614 (2021)
C.H. Nguyen, A.N. Utama, N. Lewty, C. Kurtsiefer, Operating a near-concentric cavity at the last stable resonance. Phys. Rev. A 98, 063833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.063833
D.L. Moehring, M.J. Madsen, K.C. Younge, J.R.N. Kohn, P. Maunz, L.-M. Duan, C. Monroe, B.B. Blinov, Quantum networking with photons and trapped atoms. J. Opt. Soc. AM. B 24, 300 (2007)
E. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies. Phys. Rev. 69, 681 (1946)
K.M. Fortier, S.Y. Kim, M.J. Gibbons, P. Ahmadi, M.S. Chapman, Deterministic loading of individual atoms to a high-finesse optical cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 233601 (2007)
J. Gallego, W. Alt, T. Macha, M. Martinez-Dorantes, D. Pandey, D. Meschede, Strong Purcell effect on a neutral atom trapped in an open fiber cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 173603 (2018)
G.T. Hickman, M. Saffman, Speed, retention loss, and motional heating of atoms in an optical conveyor belt. Phys. Rev. A 101, 063411 (2020)
D.M. Harber, H.J. Lewandowski, J.M. McGuirk, E.A. Cornell, Effect of cold collisions on spin coherence and resonance shifts in a magnetically trapped ultracold gas. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053616 (2002)
P. Treutlein, P. Hommelhoff, T. Steinmetz, T.W. Hänsch, J. Reichel, Coherence in microchip traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 203005 (2004)
B. Merkel, K. Thirumalai, J.E. Tarlton, V.M. Schäfer, C.J. Ballance, T.P. Harty, D.M. Lucas, Magnetic field stabilization system for atomic physics experiments. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 044702 (2019)
A.G. Radnaev, Y.O. Dudin, R. Zhao, H.H. Jen, S.D. Jenkins, A. Kuzmich, T.A.B. Kennedy, A quantum memory with telecom-wavelength conversion. Nat. Phys. 6, 894–899 (2010)
A. Dréau, A. Tchebotareva, A.E. Mahdaoui, C. Bonato, R. Hanson, Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond to telecommunication wavelengths. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 064031 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.064031
Acknowledgements
This material is based on work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science National Quantum Information Science Research Centers and support from NSF Award 2016136 for the QLCI center Hybrid Quantum Architectures and Networks. AS acknowledges the support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [funding reference number PDF - 546105 - 2020]. CBY and AS contributed equally to the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Fiber-coupling efficiency of a high-NA lens
To calculate the coupling efficiency of the scattered photons into a single-mode fiber, we assume that the fiber supports a Gaussian mode. In other words, we assume that a Gaussian mode can be coupled into the fiber with 100% efficiency. Thus, we find the field distribution of the radiating dipole after the collection lens, i.e., between the two lenses shown in Fig. 2, and calculate its overlap with a collimated Gaussian mode.
Referring to the geometry shown in the inset of Fig. 2, the three components of the electric field of a radiating dipole are given by
where \(\phi\) is the azimuthal angle. After passing through the collection lens, the spherical coordinates are transformed in the following way:
Converting Eqs. (19) and (20) to cylindrical coordinates gives the following expressions for the field amplitudes after the collection lens:
where f is the focal length of the lens, \(\rho\) is the radial coordinate from the axis of the lens, and the factor of \(f^{1/2}/(f^2+\rho ^2)^{1/4}\)(\(\sqrt{\cos {\theta }}\) in spherical coordinates before the lens) accounts for the projection of the field onto the lens plane. Note that in both coordinate systems, the integral of the dipole field \(\mathbf{E}_D=\mathbf{E}_{\sigma \pm }\) or \(\mathbf{E}_D=\mathbf{E}_\pi\) over half of the full solid angle gives half of the total energy emitted by the dipole
The field of a circularly polarized Gaussian laser mode with waist w is given by
We then calculate the overlap integral of the collimated dipole field, Eqs. (21) and (22), with the Gaussian mode of Eq.(25)
where \(\rho _{\mathrm{NA}} = \frac{f \mathrm NA}{\sqrt{1-(\mathrm NA)^2}}\). From this integral, we see that the overlap of the \(\pi\)-polarized light emitted by the atom and the Gaussian mode is zero. Thus, the \(\pi\)-polarized photons do not couple into the single-mode fiber. We also calculate the overlap of the circularly polarized light emitted by the atom with the Gaussian mode which is shown in Fig. 2. As the NA of the lens changes, the beam waist w in Eq. (25) has to be adjusted to maximize the overlap integral.
We note that the transverse profile of the photons collected and collimated by the lens is not Gaussian. Also, the polarization of the photons changes gradually from circular at the center (\(\rho =0\)) to elliptical as \(\rho\) increases. Both of these effects contribute to decreasing the overlap integral in Eq. (26).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Young, C.B., Safari, A., Huft, P. et al. An architecture for quantum networking of neutral atom processors. Appl. Phys. B 128, 151 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-022-07865-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-022-07865-0