Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of US elastography in the differentiation of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications, using histology as the reference standard. Between May 2006 and April 2007, real-time US elasticity images were obtained in 77 patients (age range, 24–67 years; mean, 46 years) with 77 mammographically detected areas of microcalcifications (42 benign and 35 malignant lesions) prior to needle biopsy. Two experienced radiologists reviewed cine clips of elasticity and B-mode images and assigned an elasticity score of 1 to 3 in consensus, based on the degree of strain in the hypoechoic lesion without information of mammography and histology. For the elasticity score, the mean ± standard deviation was 1.5 ± 0.7 for benign and 2.7 ± 0.7 for malignant lesions (P < 0.001). When a cutoff point between elasticity scores of 1 and 2 was used, US elastography showed 97% (34/35) sensitivity, 62% (26/42) specificity, 68% (34/50) PPV, and 96% (26/27) NPV with an Az value of 0.852 (0.753–0.923, 95% confidence interval) in the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcifications. Our results suggest that US elastography has the potential to differentiate benign and malignant lesions associated with microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR (1989) Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 172:235–241

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Monsees BS (1995) Evaluation of breast microcalcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 33:1109–1121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egan RL, McSweeney MB, Sewell CW (1980) Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases. Radiology 137:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T (2005) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations. Eur J Radiol 55:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackman RJ, Rodriguez-Soto J (2006) Breast microcalcifications: retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsy–frequency, causes, and outcome. Radiology 239:61–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ et al (2007) Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 242:388–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH, Noh DY, Park IA (2000) US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 217:849–854

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:941–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT (2002) Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1007–1015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20:260–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J et al (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS (2003) In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:427–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ et al (2006) Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging—clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 238:425–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM et al (2007) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 245:401–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C et al (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18:2381–2389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Booi RC, Carson PL, O'Donnell M, Roubidoux MA, Hall AL, Rubin JM (2008) Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study. Ultrasound Med Biol 34:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan SM, Teh HS, Mancer JF, Poh WT (2008) Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography—a clinical approach. Breast 17:252–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system—mammography (BI-RADS™), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston

  21. Tohno E, Ueno E (2008) Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer 15:200–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant (A062260) from the Innovative Research Institute for Cell Therapy, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Nariya Cho & Woo Kyung Moon

  2. Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jeong-Seon Park

  3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 100-744, Republic of Korea

    Woo Kyung Moon

Authors
  1. Nariya Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Woo Kyung Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeong-Seon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo Kyung Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, N., Moon, W.K. & Park, JS. Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 19, 1621–1628 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation