Skip to main content
Log in

Robust assessment of the transmural extent of myocardial infarction in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI studies using appropriate angular and circumferential subdivision of the myocardium

  • Computer Applications
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A computer-assisted method is proposed to estimate transmural extent of myocardial infarction. In 40 patients with chronic myocardial infarction and 3 control subjects, late gadolinium enhancement images were acquired with magnetic resonance imaging. Segmental infarct transmural extent was visually assessed by two experts on a 5-point scale. A fuzzy c-means algorithm was applied on both the cavity and myocardium to estimate an enhancement index for 12 sub-regions of each segment. A threshold was defined on a training database (n=29) to establish the transmurality extent of each sub-segment and was applied to the validation database (n=14). Inter-observer reproducibility reached an absolute agreement (Aa) of 85% and a kappa value (κ) of 0.83 when considering the whole training database; Aa decreased to 62% and κ to 0.68 when excluding homogeneous segments. On the validation database, segments were subdivided into three angular sub-segments. Then, inter-observer visual reproducibility reached Aa of 93% and κ of 0.92. Moreover, the absolute comparison of each expert with the computer-assisted method yielded Aa higher than 88% and κ higher than 0.86. The computer-assisted method quantifies infarct transmurality without defining remote and infarcted regions, and the transmural extent is accurately characterized when dividing each segment into three angular sub-segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ, Judd RM (2003) Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 361:374–379 DOI 10.1016/S0140−6736(03)12389−6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, Momose M, Sammer A, Haas F, Schnackenburg B, Delius W, Mudra H, Wolfram D, Schwaiger M (2002) Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast−enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 105:162–167 DOI 10.1161/hc0202.102123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP, Hofman MB, Visser CA, Lammertsma AA, Heussen N, Visser FC, van Rossum AC (2003) Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1341–1348 DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00158-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM (1999) Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100:1992–2002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM (2000) The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 343:1445–1453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ (2001) Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 357:21–28 DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03567-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC (2004) Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 230:576–582 DOI 10.1148/radiol.2302021120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima JA (2002) Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 106:1083–1089 DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000027818.15792.1E

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1985–1991 DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00958-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Amado LC, Gerber BL, Gupta SN, Rettmann DW, Szarf G, Schock R, Nasir K, Kraitchman DL, Lima JA (2004) Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2383–2389 DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuijf JD, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ, Viergever EP, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Bax JJ (2004) Quantification of myocardial infarct size and transmurality by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in men. Am J Cardiol 94:284–288 DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu LY, Natanzon A, Kellman P, Hirsch GA, Aletras AH, Arai AE (2006) Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part I: Animal validation of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:298–308 DOI 10.1002/jmri.20496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolipaka A, Chatzimavroudis GP, White DW, O'Donnell TP, Setser RM (2005) Segmentation of non-viable myocardium in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:301–311 DOI 10.1007/s10554-004-5806-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  15. Positano V, Pingitore A, Giorgetti A, Favilli B, Santarelli MF, Landini L, Marzullo P, Lombardi M (2005) A fast and effective method to assess myocardial necrosis by means of contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:487–494 DOI 10.1081/JCMR-200053630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noble NMI, Hill DLG, Breeuwer M, Razavi R (2004) The automatic identification of hibernating myocardium. In: Barillot C (ed) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 890–898

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Hillenbrand HB, Wu E, Bundy JM, Finn JP, Judd RM (2001) An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218:215–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542 DOI 10.1161/hc0402.102975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner H, Kliebsch U (1996) Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology 7:199–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu LY, Ingkanisorn WP, Kellman P, Aletras AH, Arai AE (2006) Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part II: Clinical application of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:309–314 DOI 10.1002/jmri.20495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laissy JP, Hyafil F, Feldman LJ, Juliard JM, Schouman-Claeys E, Steg PG, Faraggi M (2005) Differentiating acute myocardial infarction from myocarditis: diagnostic value of early- and delayed-perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 237:75–82 DOI 10.1148/radiol.2371041322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen SE, Jerosch-Herold M, Hudsmith LE, Robson MD, Francis JM, Doll HA, Selvanayagam JB, Neubauer S, Watkins H (2007) Evidence for microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: new insights from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 115:2418–2425 DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.657023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Dr. Alain Giron for his helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédérique Frouin.

Appendix

Appendix

The fuzzy c-means algorithm was used to classify image pixels by computing their measure of membership for a specified class; in this application, two classes are considered, the first class contains enhanced pixels and is called C E , the second class characterizes non-enhanced pixels and is called C NE .

The image pixels are characterized by their grey levels. Therefore, the membership function of each pixel p for the two classes C E and C NE , which are respectively called \(u_p^{C_E } \) and \(u_p^{C_{NE} } \) (0 ≤\(u_p^{C_E } \)≤1, 0 ≤\(u_p^{C_{NE} } \)≤1) which indicates the similarity between each pixel and the centroid of each class is defined by:

$$u_p^{C_E } = \left[ {\left( {\frac{{\left\| {I_p - I_{C_E } } \right\|}}{{{\text{ }}\left\| {I_p - I_{C_{NE} } } \right\|{\text{ }}}}} \right)^{\frac{1}{{q - 1}}} + 1} \right]^{ - 1} \;and\;u_p^{C_{NE} } = \left[ {\left( {\frac{{\left\| {I_p - I_{C_{NE} } } \right\|}}{{{\text{ }}\left\| {I_p - I_{C_E } } \right\|{\text{ }}}}} \right)^{\frac{1}{{q - 1}}} + 1} \right]^{ - 1} $$

where I p is the grey level intensity within the pixel p, \(I_{C_E } \) and \(I_{C_{NE} } \)are respectively the intensity of the C E and C NE centroids, and q is the amount of the classification fuzziness (q = 2, here).

To estimate the centroids and the corresponding membership functions, the global cost function O fcmean defined below is minimized:

$$O_{fcmean} = \sum\limits_{p \in IM} {\left\{ {\left[ {u_p^{C_E } } \right]^q \cdot \left\| {I_p - I_{C_E } } \right\| + \left[ {u_p^{C_{NE} } } \right]^q \cdot \left\| {I_p - I_{C_{NE} } } \right\|} \right\}} ,$$

where IM is the region that includes both the myocardium and the cavity.

The fuzzy c-means algorithm was applied for each slice level independently because of possible large grey level variations from one slice to another, and the maps of membership for the class C E , \(u_p^{C_E } \), were stored.Using this configuration, the centroid of the class C E is a grey level inside the cavity, thus insuring that pixels with higher intensity, i.e., infarct pixels had a high membership for the class C E and that all pixels with low intensity, i.e., normal myocardium pixels, have a low membership for this class C E. The classification in three classes for normal myocardium, cavity and infarct was not judged relevant for two reasons: firstly, the class of infarcted pixels did not always exist; secondly, even if it existed, the sometimes low contrast between cavity and infarct did not enable a more efficient estimation of the infarct compared with the two-class estimation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kachenoura, N., Redheuil, A., Herment, A. et al. Robust assessment of the transmural extent of myocardial infarction in late gadolinium-enhanced MRI studies using appropriate angular and circumferential subdivision of the myocardium. Eur Radiol 18, 2140–2147 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0991-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0991-0

Keywords

Navigation