Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Segmentation of non-viable myocardium in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate six algorithms for segmenting non-viable left ventricular (LV) myocardium in delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Twenty-three patients with known chronic ischemic heart disease underwent DE-MRI. DE images were first manually thresholded using an interactive region-filling tool to isolate non-viable myocardium. Then, six thresholding algorithms, based on the image intensity characteristics of either LV blood pool (BP), viable LV myocardium, or both, were applied to each image. For the Mean−2SDBP algorithm, thresholds were equal to the mean BP intensity minus twice its standard deviation. For the Mean+2SDSemi, Mean+3SDSemi, Mean+2SDAuto, and Mean+3SDAuto algorithms, thresholds equaled the mean intensity of viable myocardium plus twice (or thrice, as denoted by the name) the standard deviation of intensity (subscripts denote how these values were determined: automatic or semi-automatic). For the Minimum Intensity algorithm, the threshold equaled the minimum intensity between the BP and LV myocardium mean intensities. Percent Scar was defined as the ratio of non-viable to total myocardial pixels in each image. Agreement between each algorithm and manual thresholding was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Mean Percent Scar was 25 ± 16% by manual thresholding. Five of the six algorithms demonstrated mean bias within ±3% (all except Mean+2SDAuto); however, limits of agreement (LoA) were large in general (range 12–36%). The best overall agreement was demonstrated by the Mean+2SDSemi (bias, 0%; LoA, 12%) and Mean+3SDSemi(bias, −3%; LoA, 14%) algorithms. Conclusion: On average, five of the six algorithms proved satisfactory for clinical implementation; however, in some images, manual correction of automatic results was necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AE Stillman N Wilke M. Jerosch-Herold (1999) ArticleTitleMyocardial viability Radiol Clin North Am 37 361–378 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3hsVylsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10198648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JJ Bax A Roos Particlede EE. Wall Particlevan der (1999) ArticleTitleAssessment of myocardial viability by MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 10 418–422 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mvjsl2hug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10508304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. KM Choi RJ Kim G Gubernikoff JD Vargas M Parker RM. Judd (2001) ArticleTitleTransmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function Circulation 104 1101–1107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvpt12jsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11535563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. RJ Kim E Wu A Rafael et al. (2000) ArticleTitleThe use of contrast-enhanced MRI to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction New Engl J Med 343 1445–1453 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FisFWnsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11078769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. E Wu RM Judd JD Vargas FJ Klocke RO Bonow RJ. Kim (2001) ArticleTitleVisualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction Lancet 357 21–28 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtV2huw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11197356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. C Klein SG Nekolla FM Bengel et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAssessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography Circulation 105 162–167 Occurrence Handle11790695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RJ Kim DS Fieno TB Parrish et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRelationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age and contractile function Circulation 100 1992–2002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivVensg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10556226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DS Fieno RJ Kim EL Chen JW Lomasney FJ Klocke RM. Judd (2000) ArticleTitleContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk J Am Coll Cardiol 36 1985–1991 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FkvFajtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11092675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JJW Sandstede C Lipke M Beer et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAnalysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability AJR 174 1737–1740 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgt1Whtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10845515

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. RM Setser DG Bexell TP O’Donnell et al. (2003) ArticleTitleQuantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 18 434–441 Occurrence Handle14508780

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. BL Gerber CE Rochitte DA Bluemke et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRelation between Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and regional inotropic response in the periphery and center of myocardial infarction Circulation 104 998–1004 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvotV2nuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11524392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. BL Gerber J Garot DA Bluemke KC Wu JAC. Lima (2002) ArticleTitleAccuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction Circulation 106 1083–1089 Occurrence Handle12196333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H Marholdt A Wagner TA Holly et al. (2002) ArticleTitleReproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Circulation 106 2322–2327 Occurrence Handle12403661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. HB Hillenbrand RJ Kim MA Parker DS Fieno RM. Judd (2002) ArticleTitleEarly assessment of myocardial salvage by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Circulation 102 1678–1683

    Google Scholar 

  15. OP Simonetti RJ Kim DS Fieno et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAn improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction Radiology 218 215–223 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzitFCntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11152805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. P Kellman AE Arai ER McVeigh A. Aletras (2002) ArticleTitlePhase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium delayed hyperenhancement Magn Reson Med 47 372–383 Occurrence Handle11810682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JM Bland DG. Altman (1986) ArticleTitleStatistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307–310 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3MjhvFc%3D Occurrence Handle2868172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Samuels ML, Witmer JA. The normal distribution. In: Statistics for the Life Sciences. Prentice Hall, 1999; 500–559.

  19. BL Gerber CE Rochitte JA Melin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleMicrovascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction Circulation 101 2734–2741 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czhtFensw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10851212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph M. Setser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolipaka, A., Chatzimavroudis, G.P., White, R.D. et al. Segmentation of non-viable myocardium in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21, 303–311 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-5806-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-5806-z

Keywords

Navigation