Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because cardiac computed tomography (CT) (mainly coronary CT angiography) is a very promising technique, used more and more for coronary artery evaluation, the benefits and risks of this new low-invasive technique must be balanced. Radiation dose is a major concern for coronary CT angiography, especially in case of repeated examinations or in particular subgroups of patients (for example young female patients). Radiation dose to patient tends to increase from 16- to 64-slice CT. Radiation exposure in ECG-gated acquisitions may reach up to 40 mSv; considerable differences are attributable to the performance of CT machines, to technical dose-sparing tools, but also to radiological habits. Setting radiation dose at the lowest level possible should be a constant goal for the radiologist. Current technological tools are detailed in regard to their efficiency. Optimisation is necessary, by a judicious use of technological tools and also by individual adaptation of kV or mAs. This paper reviews the different current strategies for radiation dose reduction, keeping image quality constant. Data from the literature are discussed, and future technological developments are considered in regards to radiation dose reduction. The particular case of paediatric patients with congenital heart disease is also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1409–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Stratakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 32:1621–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poll LW, Cohnen M, Brachten S, Ewen K, Modder U (2002) Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation (“ECG pulsing”): phantom measurements. Rofo 174:1500–1505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241(2):378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM et al (2006) Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 16:1964–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA (1999) Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9:323–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. d’Agostino AG, Remy-Jardin M, Khalil C et al (2006) Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients. Eur Radiol 16:2137–2146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Starck G, Lonn L, Cederblad A, Forssell-Aronsson E, Sjostrom L, Alpsten M (2002) A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose. Br J Radiol 75:140–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung B, Mahnken AH, Stargardt A et al (2003) Individually weight-adapted examination protocol in retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT of the heart. Eur Radiol 13:2560–2566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P et al (2005) Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 15:334–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Paul JF (2006) MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S387–S390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE et al (2006) Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 1–6

  19. Geleijns J, Salvado Artells M, Veldkamp WJ, Lopez Tortosa M, Calzado Cantera A (2006) Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Eur Radiol 16:2334–2340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: European commission. Publication No. EUR 16262 EN

  21. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Morin RL (2005) Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Kuttner A et al (2003) Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 175:1051–1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al (2006) Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 113:823–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113:394–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:2042–2047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C et al (2005) Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 236:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A et al (2006) Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-006-0334-y

  29. Paul JF, Lambert V, Losay J et al (2002) Three-dimensional multislice CT scanner: value in patients with pulmonary atresia with septal defect. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 95:427–432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello L, Zahka K (2003) Pictorial essay. Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:973–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Westra SJ, Hill JA, Alejos JC, Galindo A, Boechat MI, Laks H (1999) Three-dimensional helical CT of pulmonary arteries in infants and children with congenital heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:109–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK et al (2005) Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on non-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paul JF, Abada HT, Sigal-Cinqualbre A (2004) Should low-kilovoltage chest CT protocols be the rule for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1172, author reply 1172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vock P (2005) CT dose reduction in children. Eur Radiol 15:2330–2340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Westra SJ, Hurteau J, Galindo A, McNitt-Gray MF, Boechat MI, Laks H (1999) Cardiac electron-beam CT in children undergoing surgical repair for pulmonary atresia. Radiology 213:502–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, 133 Avenue de la Résistance, 92350, Le Plessis-Robinson, France

    Jean-François Paul

  2. Department of Radiology, Vascular and Interventional Section, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Hicham T. Abada

Authors
  1. Jean-François Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hicham T. Abada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Paul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, JF., Abada, H.T. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol 17, 2028–2037 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0584-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0584-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation