Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of drug–drug interactions in sarcoma patients: key role of the pharmacist integration for toxicity risk management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The risk of drug–drug interactions (DDI) has become a major issue in cancer patients. However, data in sarcoma patients are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and the factors associated with DDI with antitumor treatments, and to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist evaluation before anticancer treatment.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive sarcoma patients starting chemotherapy (CT) or Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A pharmacist performed medication reconciliation and established an early toxicity risk assessment. Potential DDI with antitumor drugs were identified using Micromedex electronic software.

Results

One hundred and twenty-two soft-tissue and 80 bone sarcoma patients (103 males, median age 50 years,) were included before CT (86%) or TKI (14%). The median number of medications was 3; 34 patients (22% of patients with medication reconciliation) reported complementary medicine use. 37 potential DDI classified as major, were identified (12% of the 243 pre-therapeutic assessments). In multivariate analysis, TKI (p < 0.0001), proton pump inhibitor (p = 0.026) and antidepressant (p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of DDI (p < 0.02). Only marital status (p = 0.003) was associated with complementary medicine use. A pharmacist performed 157 medication reconciliations and made 71 interventions among 59 patients (37%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with pharmacist intervention were: complementary medicines (p = 0.004), drugs number (p = 0.005) and treatment with TKI (p = 0.0002)

Conclusions

Clinical interventions on DDI are more frequently required among sarcoma patients treated with TKI than CT. Multidisciplinary risk assessment including a medication reconciliation by a pharmacist could be crucial to prevent DDI with TKI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

ALanine transaminase

AST:

ASpartate transaminase

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CT:

Chemotherapy

CM:

Complementarymedicine

DDI:

Drug–drug interactions

IQR:

Interquartile range

MR:

Medication reconciliation

PPI:

Proton pump inhibitor

STS:

Soft tissue sarcoma

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

References

  1. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Jones RL, Hensley ML, Schuetze SM, Staddon A et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine for metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of conventional chemotherapy: Results of a phase III randomized multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 34(8):786–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schöffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG, Italiano A, Gelderblom H, Choy E et al (2016) Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 387(10028):1629–1637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schöffski P, Ray-Coquard IL, Cioffi A, Bui NB, Bauer S, Hartmann JT et al (2011) Activity of eribulin mesylate in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: a phase 2 study in four independent histological subtypes. Lancet Oncol 12(11):1045–1052

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, Le Cesne A, Scurr M, Schöffski P et al (2009) Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol 27(19):3126–3132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom A, Heinrich MC, Debiec-Rychter M, Corless CL et al (2005) Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib target exploration consortium study B2225. J Clin Oncol 23(4):866–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL, Dal Cin P, Antonescu CR, Jhanwar SC et al (2010) Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med 363(18):1727–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffaud F, Mir O, Boudou-Rouquette P, Piperno-Neumann S, Penel N, Bompas E et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 20(1):120–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meeting Library | Single-agent expansion cohort of lenvatinib (LEN) and combination dose-finding cohort of LEN + etoposide (ETP) + ifosfamide (IFM) in patients (pts) aged 2 to ≤25 years with relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma (OS). [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun 21]. Available from: https://meetinglibrary.asco.org/record/162201/abstract

  9. Cabozantinib Prolongs Survival in Patients with Advanced Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma [Internet]. Targeted Oncology. [cited 2019 Jun 21]. Available from: https://www.targetedonc.com/conference/ctos-2018/cabozantinib-prolongs-survival-in-patients-with-advanced-osteosarcoma-and-ewing-sarcoma

  10. Scripture CD, Figg WD (2006) Drug interactions in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 6(7):546–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Riechelmann RP, Del Giglio A (2009) Drug interactions in oncology: how common are they? Ann Oncol 20(12):1907–1912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng Y-Y, Hsieh C-H, Tsai T-H (2018) Concurrent administration of anticancer chemotherapy drug and herbal medicine on the perspective of pharmacokinetics. J Food Drug Anal 26(2S):S88-95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis EL, Oh B, Butow PN, Mullan BA, Clarke S (2012) Cancer patient disclosure and patient-doctor communication of complementary and alternative medicine use: a systematic review. Oncologist 17(11):1475–1481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mouly S, Lloret-Linares C, Sellier P-O, Sene D, Bergmann J-F (2017) Is the clinical relevance of drug-food and drug-herb interactions limited to grapefruit juice and Saint-John’s Wort? Pharmacol Res 118:82–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fabre E, Thomas-Schoemann A, Blanchet B (2017) Letter to the editor regarding the paper by Loquai C et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine: a multicenter cross-sectional study in 1089 melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer 85:158–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Leeuwen RWF, Brundel DHS, Neef C, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RHJ, Burger DM et al (2013) Prevalence of potential drug–drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. Br J Cancer 108(5):1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Okada N, Watanabe H, Kagami S, Ishizawa K (2016) Ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy may interact with warfarin, enhancing the warfarin induced anticoagulant response. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 54(1):58–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strippoli S, Lorusso V, Albano A, Guida M (2013) Herbal-drug interaction induced rhabdomyolysis in a liposarcoma patient receiving trabectedin. BMC Complement Altern Med 30(13):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Damato A, Larocca M, Rondini E, Menga M, Pinto C, Versari A (2017) Severe rhabdomyolysis during treatment with trabectedin in combination with a herbal drug in a patient with metastatic synovial sarcoma: a case report. Case Rep Oncol 10(1):258–264

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bundow D, Aboulafia DM (2004) Potential drug interaction with paclitaxel and highly active antiretroviral therapy in two patients with AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma. Am J Clin Oncol 27(1):81–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cianfrocca M, Lee S, Von Roenn J, Rudek MA, Dezube BJ, Krown SE et al (2011) Pilot study evaluating the interaction between paclitaxel and protease inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68(4):827–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabatura AH, Cirrone F, Harris C, McDonnell AM, Feng Y, Voit D et al (2015) An assessment of risk factors associated with ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy in a large academic cancer center. J Oncol Pharm Pract 21(3):188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu CF, Xue Z, Bing N, King KS, McCann LA, de Souza PL et al (2012) Concomitant use of pazopanib and simvastatin increases the risk of transaminase elevations in patients with cancer. Ann Oncol 23(9):2470–2471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goh BC, Reddy NJ, Dandamudi UB, Laubscher KH, Peckham T, Hodge JP et al (2010) An evaluation of the drug interaction potential of pazopanib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, using a modified Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 88(5):652–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kheshti R, Aalipour M, Namazi S (2016) A comparison of five common drug–drug interaction software programs regarding accuracy and comprehensiveness. J Res Pharm Pract 5(4):257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawenda BD, Kelly KM, Ladas EJ, Sagar SM, Vickers A, Blumberg JB (2008) Should supplemental antioxidant administration be avoided during chemotherapy and radiation therapy? J Natl Cancer Inst 100(11):773–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ge J, Tan B-X, Chen Y, Yang L, Peng X-C, Li H-Z et al (2011) Interaction of green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate with sunitinib: potential risk of diminished sunitinib bioavailability. J Mol Med (Berl) 89(6):595–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nightingale G, Pizzi LT, Barlow A, Barlow B, Jacisin T, McGuire M et al (2018) The prevalence of major drug-drug interactions in older adults with cancer and the role of clinical decision support software. J Geriatr Oncol 9(5):526–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lavan AH, O’Mahony D, Buckley M, O’Mahony D, Gallagher P (2019) Adverse drug reactions in an oncological population: prevalence, predictability, and preventability. Oncologist 24(9):e968–e977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonnet C, Boudou-Rouquette P, Azoulay-Rutman E, Huillard O, Golmard J-L, Carton E et al (2017) Potential drug-drug interactions with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prevalence study in France. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 79(5):1051–1055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beinse G, Reitter D, Segaux L, Carvahlo-Verlinde M, Rousseau B, Tournigand C et al (2019) Potential drug-drug interactions and risk of unplanned hospitalization in older patients with cancer: A survey of the prospective ELCAPA (ELderly CAncer PAtients) cohort. J Geriatr Oncol. 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bossaer JB, Eskens D, Gardner A (2021) Sensitivity and specificity of drug interaction databases to detect interactions with recently approved oral antineoplastics. J Oncol Pharm Pract 12:1078155220984244

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Leeuwen RWF, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RHJ, Jansman FGA (2014) Drug–drug interactions with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a clinical perspective. Lancet Oncol 15(8):e315–e326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shah RR, Morganroth J (2015) Update on cardiovascular safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: with a special focus on QT interval, left ventricular dysfunction and overall risk/benefit. Drug Saf 38(8):693–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moslehi JJ (2016) Cardiovascular toxic effects of targeted cancer therapies. N Engl J Med 375(15):1457–1467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lalani AKA, Mckay RR, Lin X, Simantov R, Kaymakcalan MD, Choueiri TK (2017) Proton pump inhibitors and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15(6):724–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lind JSW, Dingemans AMC, Groen HJM, Thunnissen FB, Bekers O, Heideman DAM et al (2010) A multicenter phase II study of erlotinib and sorafenib in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(11):3078–3087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mir O, Touati N, Lia M, Litière S, Le Cesne A, Sleijfer S et al (2019) Impact of concomitant administration of gastric acid-suppressive agents and pazopanib on outcomes in soft-tissue sarcoma patients treated within the EORTC 62043/62072 trials. Clin Cancer Res 25(5):1479–1485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson SB, Park HS, Gross CP, Yu JB (2018) Complementary medicine, refusal of conventional cancer therapy, and survival among patients with curable cancers. JAMA Oncol 4(10):1375–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarradon-Eck A, Bouhnik A-D, Rey D, Bendiane M-K, Huiart L, Peretti-Watel P (2017) Use of non-conventional medicine two years after cancer diagnosis in France: evidence from the VICAN survey. J Cancer Surviv 11(4):421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Judson PL, Abdallah R, Xiong Y, Ebbert J, Lancaster JM (2017) Complementary and alternative medicine use in individuals presenting for care at a comprehensive cancer center. Integr Cancer Ther 16(1):96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Clouatre DL (2004) Kava kava: examining new reports of toxicity. Toxicol Lett 150(1):85–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shakeel F, Fang F, Kidwell KM, Marcath LA, Hertz DL (2020) Comparison of eight screening tools to detect interactions between herbal supplements and oncology agents. J Oncol Pharm Pract 26(8):1843–1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gomo C, Coriat R, Faivre L, Mir O, Ropert S, Billemont B et al (2011) Pharmacokinetic interaction involving sorafenib and the calcium-channel blocker felodipine in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 29(6):1511–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mir O, Blanchet B, Goldwasser F (2011) Drug-induced effects on erlotinib metabolism. N Engl J Med 365(4):379–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Da Silva F, Thomas-Schoemann A, Huillard O, Goldwasser F, Blanchet B (2016) Benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring to disclose pharmacokinetic interaction between sunitinib and calcium channel blocker. Ann Oncol 27(8):1651–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DRCI grant for explore database

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception or design of the work: AB, IG, AJ, PBR, ATS. Data collection: AB, IG, SEM, ACP, CT, DB, AM, SDP, CV, JA, FG, PBR, ATS. Data analysis and interpretation; AB, IG, AJ, ATS, FG, BB, PBR. Drafting the article: AB, IG, AJ, SEM, ACP, CT, DB, AM, FG, BB, ATS, PBR. Critical revision of the article: AB, IG, AJ, SEM, ACP, CT, DB, AM, MV, RB, SDP, CV, JA, FG, BB, PBR, ATS. Final approval of the version to be published: AB, IG, AG, SEM, ACP, CT, DB, AM, MV, RB, SDP, CV, JA, FG, PBR, ATS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey Thomas-Schoemann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethic approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Local ethical committee for oncology of Cochin Hospital (AP-HP), CARPEM, university of Paris, France (number:578AB88). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLS 155 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellesoeur, A., Gataa, I., Jouinot, A. et al. Prevalence of drug–drug interactions in sarcoma patients: key role of the pharmacist integration for toxicity risk management. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 88, 741–751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04311-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04311-4

Keywords

Navigation