Abstract
Purpose
Numerous studies have attempted to clarify the exact anatomy and variations of the optic canal with non-conclusive results due to its close proximity to many vulnerable structures. We sought to determine the dynamics of growth and development of these structures on fetal skulls, which will help us to better understand of gender and age-dependent variations, as well as fatal malformations.
Methods
Fifteen previously macerated fetal frontal and sphenoid bones were analyzed and the diameters of optic canal, and distance of orbit from frontomaxillary suture to frontozygomatic suture were measured using 3D reconstruction images obtained by micro-CT.
Results
Average diameter of the optic canal in 300 mm fetus was measured to be 1,546 ± 36 µm, in 400 mm fetus 2,470 ± 123 µm and in 500 mm fetus 3,757 ± 203 µm. This trend indicates a linear enlargement of optic canal during the fetal period. During the same time period, diameter of the orbit enlarges from 12,319 ± 559 µm in 300 mm fetus to 19,788 ± 736 µm in 500 mm fetus. Growth curve is significantly lower in comparison with the same curve in optic canal data. We also calculated the ratio of orbit diameter and optic canal diameter between those groups which decreased from a value of 7.9 ± 0.4 for 300 mm fetus to 5.3 ± 0.2 for 500 mm fetus.
Conclusion
Dynamics of optic canal and orbital cavity development is different in early and late fetal period. Diameters of those structures are in better correlation with the fetal length.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birnholz JC (1985) Ultrasound fetal ophthalmology. Early Hum Dev 12:199–209
Burns NS, Iyer RS, Robinson AJ, Chapman T (2013) Diagnostic imaging of fetal and pediatric orbital abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:797–808
Daniels LR, Yu S, Pech P, Haughton VM (1987) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the orbital apex. Radiol Clin North Am 25:803–817
deHaan AB, Willekens B, Klooster J, Los AA, van Zweiten J, Botha CP, Spekreijse H, Ijskes SG, Simonsz HJ (2006) The prenatal development of the human orbit. Strabismus 14:51–56
Dilmen G, Koktener A, Turhan NO, Tez S (2002) Growth of the fetal lens and orbit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 76:267–271
Gausas RE (2004) Advances in applied anatomy of the eyelid and orbit. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 15:422–425
Gentry LR (1998) Anatomy of the orbit. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 8:171–194
Haas A, Weiglein A, Faschinger C, Mullner K (1993) Fetal development of the human orbit. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231:217–220
Jeantry P, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Van Gausbeke D, Van Regemorter N, Rodesch F (1982) Fetal ocular biometry by ultrasound. Radiology 143:573–576
Judas M, Petanjek Z, Kostovic I (2011) Jelena Krmpotic-Nemanic (1921–2008): contributions to human neuroanatomy. Coll Antropol 35(Suppl 1):345–349
Mayden KL, Tortora M, Berkowitz RL, Bracken M, Hobbins JC (1982) Orbital diameters: a new parameter for prenatal diagnosis and dating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:289–297
Pommier S, Adalian P, Gaudart J, Panvel M, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Leonetti G (2009) Fetal age estimation using orbital measurements: 3D CT-scan including the effects of trisomy 21. Forensic Sci 54:7–12
Prado PA, Ribeiro EC, De Angelis MA, Smith RL (2007) Biometric study of the optic canal during cranial development. Orbit 26:107–111
René C (2006) Update on orbital anatomy. Eye (Lond) 20:1119–1129
Rontal E, Rontal M, Guilford FT (1979) Surgical anatomy of the orbit. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 88(3 Pt 1):382–386
Seiji F, Moreira RS, De Angelis MA, Smith Chairman RL (2009) Orbital asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Orbit 28(6):342–346
Sukonpan K, Phupong V (2009) A biometric study of the fetal orbit and lens in normal pregnancies. J Clin Ultrasound 37:69–74
Tomasik E, Czepita D, Zejmo M, Czerwinski F (2005) Development of the human eyeball and orbit during the fetal life. Ann Acad Med Stetin 51:37–40
Trout T, Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, McGahan JP (1994) Significance of orbital measurements in the fetus. J Ultrasound Med 13:937–943
Weisman RA (1988) Surgical anatomy of the orbit. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 21:1–12
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
Appropriate ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Zagreb.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumic-Cule, I., Eljuga, D., Izadpanah, A. et al. Dynamics of optic canal and orbital cavity development revealed by microCT. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 989–992 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1296-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1296-4