Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This metaanalysis aimed to compare endoscopic linear stapling and loop ligatures used to secure the base of the appendix.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials on appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy were systematically searched and critically appraised. The results in terms of complication rates, operating time, and hospital stay were pooled by standard metaanalytic techniques.

Results

Data on 427 patients from four studies were included. The operative time was 9 min longer when loops were used (p = 0.04). Superficial wound infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.71; p = 0.01) and postoperative ileus (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14–0.89; p = 0.03) were significantly less frequent when the appendix stump was secured with staples instead of loops. Of 10 intraoperative ruptures of the appendix, 7 occurred in loop-treated patients (p = 0.46). Hospital stay and frequency of postoperative intraabdominal abscess also were comparable in loop-treated and staple-treated patients.

Conclusions

The clinical evidence on stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy favors the routine use of endoscopic staplers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. al Fallouji M (1993) Making loops in laparoscopic surgery: state of the art. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 477–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18: 749–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5: 176–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniell JF, Gurley LD, Kurtz BR, Chambers JF (1991) The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. Obstet Gynecol 78: 721–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillem P, Mulliez E, Proye C, Pattou F (2004) Retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: the need for systematic double ligature of the appendiceal base. Surg Endosc 18: 717–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Vereinfachte Appendektomie ohne Stumpfversenkung: Erfahrungen aus 20-jähriger konventioneller und 5-jähriger laparoskopischer Anwendung. Chirurg 69: 66–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klaiber C, Wagner M, Metzger A (1994) Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 205–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Klima S (1998) Bedeutung der Appendixstumpfversorgung bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 90–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klima S, Schyra B (1996) Technik und Bedeutung der Stumpfversorgung für das Ergebnis der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113: 556–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange J, Zünd MR, Nägeli J (1993) Prospektiv randomisierte Studie: Roederschlinge versus Endo-GIA bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie [abstract]. Min Invas Chir 2(Suppl 1): 8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lörken M, Marnitz U, Schumpelick V (1999) Freier intraperitonealer Clip als Ursache eines mechanischen Dünndarmileus. Chirurg 70: 1492–1493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nottingham JM (2002) Mechanical small bowel obstruction from a loose linear cutter staple after laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 289–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1: 188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88: 200–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrocelli P, Corsale I, Giannessi S, Cerone M, Colugnat D, Matocci GC (2003) Complicanze da suture meccaniche in chirurgia laparoscopica: occlusione intestinale da clip: Segnalazione di un caso clinico e revisione della letteratura. Minerva Chir 58: 591–594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EAM (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383: 289–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer E (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration (ed) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. IV/2004 (CD-ROM). Update Software, Oxford, UK

  23. Sauerland S, Seiler CM (2005) Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29: 582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Frei E, Büchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17: 497–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shalaby R, Arnos A, Desoky A, Samaha AH (2001) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: evaluation of different techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G, Cuschieri A (1994) Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 8: 1285–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    G. Kazemier, K. H. in’t Hof & H. J. Bonjer

  2. Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Merheim Hospital, University of Witten-Herdecke, Cologne, Germany

    S. Saad

  3. Biochemical and Experimental Division, Medical Faculty, Cologne University, Cologne, Germany

    S. Sauerland

Authors
  1. G. Kazemier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. H. in’t Hof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Saad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. J. Bonjer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Sauerland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kazemier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazemier, G., in’t Hof, K.H., Saad, S. et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?. Surg Endosc 20, 1473–1476 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation