Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bedside Placement of Removable Vena Cava Filters Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound in the Critically Injured

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bedside placement of removable inferior vena cava filters (RVCF) is increasingly used in critically injured patients. The need for fluoroscopic equipment and specialized intensive care unit beds presents major challenges. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) eliminates such problems. The objective of the present study was to analyze the safety and feasibility of IVUS-guided bedside RVCF placement in critically injured patients.

Methods

Between October 2004 and July 2006 47 IVUS-guided RVCF were placed at the bedside. Medical and trauma registry records were reviewed. Primary outcome was RVCF-related complications.

Results

The mean patient age was 41 ± 19 years, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 30 ± 12. The right common femoral vein was chosen as the site of access in 40 patients, and the left common femoral vein was the access site in 7 patients. The insertion was performed 3.7 ± 2.5 days after admission. Four patients (8.5%) developed common femoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and three (6%) developed a peripheral pulmonary embolism (PE). Complications related to technique were recorded in two patients (4%) and included one misplacement and one access site bleeding with no further associated morbidity. Five patients died during the hospital stay from issues unrelated to RVCF. Forty-one patients were eligible for follow-up. Removal of RVCF was offered only to 8 patients and was performed successfully in 4 (10%) at a mean of 130 days (range: 44–183 days).

Conclusions

In this study IVUS-guided bedside placement of RVCF was feasible but was also associated with complications. Follow-up was poor, and the rate of removal disappointingly low, underscoring the need for further exploration of the role of RVCF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PE:

Pulmonary embolism

DVT:

Deep venous thrombosis

VCF:

Vena cava filter

RVCF:

Removable vena cava filter

IVUS:

Intravascular ultrasound

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ISS:

Injury severity score

AIS:

Abbreviated injury score

References

  1. Neuerburg JM, Günther RW, Vorwerk D et al (1997) Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20:10–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bovyn G, Gory P, Reynaud P et al (1997) The Tempofilter: a multicenter study of a new temporary caval filter implantable for up to six weeks. Ann Vasc Surg 11:520–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Natta TL, Morris JA, Eddy VA et al (1998) Elective bedside surgery in critically injured patients is safe and cost-effective. Ann Surg 227:618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B et al (1996) Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest 110:480–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sing RF, Smith CH, Miles WS et al (1998) Preliminary results of bedside inferior vena cava filter placement: safe and cost-effective. Chest 114:315–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Wilson J et al (1993) Prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in severely injured trauma patients: indications and preliminary results. J Trauma 35:637–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 69:654–659

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savin MA, Panicker HK, Sadiq S et al (2002) Placement of vena cava filters: factors affecting technical success and immediate complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:597–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginzburg E, Cohn SM, Lopez J et al (2003) Miami Deep Vein Thrombosis Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of intermittent pneumatic compression and low molecular weight heparin in trauma. Br J Surg 90:1338–1344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geerts WH, Code KI, Jay RM et al (1994) A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med 331:1601–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spinal Cord Injury Thromboprophylaxis Investigators (2003) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the acute treatment phase after spinal cord injury: a randomized, multicenter trial comparing low-dose heparin plus intermittent pneumatic compression with enoxaparin. J Trauma 54:1116–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ et al (1998) Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 186:528–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F et al for the Prévention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 338:409–415

    Google Scholar 

  14. PREPIC Study Group (2005) Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112:416–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Ricci MA et al (1995) Routine prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in severely injured trauma patients decreases the incidence of pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Surg 180:641–647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez JL, Lopez JM, Proctor MC et al (1996) Early placement of prophylactic vena caval filters in injured patients at high risk for pulmonary embolism. J Trauma 40:797–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khansarinia S, Dennis JW, Veldenz HC et al (1995) Prophylactic Greenfield filter placement in selected high-risk trauma patients. J Vasc Surg 22:231–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McMurtry AL, Owings JT, Anderson JT et al (1999) Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Surg 189:314–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenthal D, McKinsey JF, Levy AM et al (1994) Use of the Greenfield filter in patients with major trauma. Cardiovasc Surg 2:52–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Lai KM et al (2006) Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: initial clinical results. Ann Vasc Surg 20:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garrett JV, Passman MA, Guzman RJ et al (2004) Expanding options for bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters with intravascular ultrasound when transabdominal duplex ultrasound imaging is inadequate. Ann Vasc Surg 18:329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebaugh JL, Chiou AC, Morasch MD et al (2001) Bedside vena cava filter placement guided with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Surg 34:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers FB, Strindberg G, Shackford SR et al (1998) Five-year follow-up of prophylactic vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. Arch Surg 133:406–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bovyn G, Ricco JB, Reynaud P et al, for the European Tempofilter II Study Group (2006) Long-duration temporary vena cava filter: a prospective 104-case multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 43:1222–1229

    Google Scholar 

  25. Binkert CA, Sasadeusz K, Stavropoulos SW (2006) Retrievability of the recovery vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Indeck M, Peterson S, Smith J et al (1988) Risk, cost, and benefit of transporting ICU patients for special studies. J Trauma 28:1020–1025

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Braman SS, Dunn SM, Amico CA et al (1987) Complications of intrahospital transport in critically ill patients. Ann Intern Med 107:469–473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith I, Fleming S, Cernaianu A (1990) Mishaps during transport from the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 18:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nunn CR, Neuzil D, Naslund T et al (1997) Cost-effective method for bedside insertion of vena caval filters in trauma patients. J Trauma 43:752–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonn J, Liu JB, Eschelman DJ et al (1999) Intravascular ultrasound as an alternative to positive-contrast vena cavography prior to filter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:843–849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Lai KM et al (2005) Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: early clinical experience. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 46:163–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Levitt AB et al (2004) Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma. J Vasc Surg 40:958–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wellons ED, Rosenthal D, Shuler FW et al (2004) Real-time intravascular ultrasound-guided placement of a removable inferior vena cava filter. J Trauma 57:20–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ashley DW, Gamblin TC, McCampbell BL et al (2004) Bedside insertion of vena cava filters in the intensive care unit using intravascular ultrasound to locate renal veins. J Trauma 57:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wellons ED, Matsuura JH, Shuler FW et al (2003) Bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement. J Vasc Surg 38:455–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oppat WF, Chiou AC, Matsumura JS (1999) Intravascular ultrasound-guided vena cava filter placement. J Endovasc Surg 6:285–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tola JC, Holtzman R, Lottenberg L (1999) Bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters in the intensive care unit. Am Surg 65:833–837; discussion 837–838

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vassiliu P, Sava J, Toutouzas KG et al (2002) Is contrast as bad as we think? Renal function after angiographic embolization of injured patients. J Am Coll Surg 194:142–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoff WS, Hoey BA, Wainwright GA et al (2004) Early experience with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg 199:869–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stefanidis D, Paton BL, Jacobs DG et al (2006) Extended interval for retrieval of vena cava filters is safe and may maximize protection against pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg 192:789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Duperier T, Mosenthal A, Swan KG et al (2003) Acute complications associated with greenfield filter insertion in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma 54:545–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wojcik R, Cipolle MD, Fearen I et al (2000) Long-term follow-up of trauma patients with a vena caval filter. J Trauma 49:839–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Allen TL, Carter JL, Morris BJ et al (2005) Retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients for high-risk prophylaxis and prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg 189:656–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI et al (2006) Retrievable vena cava filters for preventing pulmonary embolism in trauma patients: a cautionary tale. J Trauma 60:35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kirilcuk NN, Herget EJ, Dicker RA et al (2005) Are temporary inferior vena cava filters really temporary? Am J Surg 190:858–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Morris CS, Rogers FB, Najarian KE et al (2004) Current trends in vena caval filtration with the introduction of a retrievable filter at a level I trauma center. J Trauma 57:32–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM et al (2005) Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1189–1193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC et al (2007) Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J Trauma 62:17–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Konstantinos Spaniolas, George C. Velmahos, Alice Gervasini, Marc De Moya & Hasan B. Alam

  2. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge Street, Suite 810, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Christopher Kwolek

Authors
  1. Konstantinos Spaniolas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George C. Velmahos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher Kwolek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alice Gervasini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marc De Moya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hasan B. Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George C. Velmahos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spaniolas, K., Velmahos, G.C., Kwolek, C. et al. Bedside Placement of Removable Vena Cava Filters Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound in the Critically Injured. World J Surg 32, 1438–1443 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9523-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9523-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation