Skip to main content
Log in

Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: Early clinical experience

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate clinically a new, retrievable vena caval filter in a multicenter study.

Methods

The Tulip filter is a stainless steel half-basket that is suitable for antegrade or retrograde insertion via an 8.5 Fr introducer sheath. The filter can be retrieved via the jugular approach using an 11 Fr coaxial retrieval system. Forty-eight filters were implanted via the femoral approach and 38 via the jugular approach in 83 patients. Follow-up examinations (plain films, colorcoded duplex sonography) were performed up to 3 years after filter insertion (mean 136 days) in 75 patients. Twenty-seven patients were screened by colorcoded duplex sonography for insertion site thrombosis.

Results

An appropriate filter position was achieved in all cases. Insertion problems occurred in 3 cases; these were not due to the filter design but to an imperfect prototype insertion mechanism that has now been modified (n=2) or a manipulation error (n=1). In 2 of these cases the filters were replaced percutaneously; 1 patient required venotomy for filter removal. No further complications due to filter insertion occurred. Two filters were used as temporary devices and were successfully removed after 6 and 11 days, respectively. There was 1 fatal recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) and 2 non-fatal PE, 5 complete and 3 partial caval occlusions, and 3 caudal migrations of the filter. Insertion site venous thrombosis was not seen in the 27 patients monitored for this complication.

Conclusion

Precise placement of the Tulip filter is feasible by either access route and the device appears mechanically stable. Further observations are needed to confirm that safe filter removal is practical up to 10 days after its insertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC (1994) Inferior vena caval filters. Curr Opin Cardiol 9:606–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorfman GS (1990) Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters. Radiology 174:987–992

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yune HY (1989) Inferior vena cava filter: Search for an ideal device. Radiology 172:15–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millward SF, Bormanis J, Burbridge BE, Markman S, Peterson RA (1994) Preliminary clinical experience with the Günther temporary inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 5:863–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thery C, Asseman P, Amrouni N, Becquart J, Pruvost P, Lesenne M, Legghe R, Marache P (1990) Use of a new removable vena cava filter in order to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients submitted to thrombolysis. Eur Heart J 11:334–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neuerburg J, Günther RW, Rassmussen E, Vorwerk D, Tonn K, Handt S, Küpper W, Hansen JV (1993) New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: Experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16:224–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Homans J (1944) Deep quiet venous thrombosis in the lower limb. Surg Gynecol Obstet 79:70–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neuerburg J, Günther RW (1994) Developments in inferior vena cava filters: A European viewpoint. Semin Intervent Radiol 11:349–357

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neuerburg J, Günther RW, Rasmussen E, Beckert K (1995) Percutaneous retrieval of a new vena cava filter: Experimental studies. Eur Radiol 5 [Suppl]:111

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darcy MD, Cardella JF, Hunter DW, Smith TP, Castañeda-Zúñiga WR, Lund G, Amplatz K (1986) Experience with the Amplatz retrievable vena caval filter: Work in progress. Radiology 161:611–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC, James EA, Abrams GD, Moursi MM (1994) Staging of fixation and retrievability of Greenfield filters. J Vasc Surg 20:744–750

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Irie T, Yamauchi T, Makita K, Kusano S (1995) Retrievable IVC filter: Preliminary in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 6:449–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCowan TC, Ferris EJ, Carver DK (1990) Inferior vena caval filter thrombi: Evaluation with intravascular US. Radiology 177:783–788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferris E, McCowan TC, Carver DK, McFarland DR (1993) Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: Follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 188:851–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenfield LJ, Cho KJ, Proctor M, Bonn J, Bookstein JJ, Castañeda-Zúñiga WR, Cutler B, Ferris EJ, Keller F, McCowan T, Pais SO, Sobel M, Tisnado J, Waltman AC (1991) Results of a multicenter study of the modified hook-titanium Greenfield filter. J Vasc Surg 14:253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hammer FD, Rousseau HP, Joffre FG, Sentenac BP, Tran-Van T, Bartheleme RP (1994) In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 5p869–876

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neuerburg J, Haupt-Pichler A, Eilers R, Siess T, Buro K, Pichler VC, Mottaghy K, Günther RW (1996) Bestimmung der Effektivität perkutaner Kavafilter: Experimentelle Untersuchungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 164:331–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Teitelbaum GP, Ortega HV, Vinitski S, Stern H, Tsuruda JS, Mitchell DG, Rifkin MD, Bradley WG (1988) Low-artifact intravascular devices: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 168: 713–719

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuerburg, J.M., Günther, R.W., Vorwerk, D. et al. Results of a multicenter study of the retrievable Tulip vena cava filter: Early clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 20, 10–16 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900102

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900102

Key words

Navigation