Skip to main content
Log in

Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: Indications and results

  • Original Scientific Reports
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows local excision of rectal tumors located 4 to 18 cm above the anal verge. The technique is not yet generally established because of the necessary special instrumentation and tools, the unusual technical aspects of the approach, and the stringent patient selection criteria. The aim of this prospective, descriptive study was to analyze the currently accepted indications for TEM and to evaluate the use of this procedure for treating rectal cancer. Over a 4-year period 50 patients aged 31 to 86 years (mean 64 years) underwent TEM for treatment of rectal tumors located 12 cm above the anal verge (range 4–18 cm). The local complication rate was 4%. Altogether, 76% of lesions were benign, and 24% were T1 and T2 tumors. Of 12 cancer cases, 4 required reoperation by total mesorectal resection; the other 8 are currently under follow-up management. Over the follow-up period of 30.6 months (range 11–54 months) the recurrence rate of T1 tumors was 8.3%. TEM is a minimally invasive surgical technique that may benefit a small, specific population of patients with rectal tumors. Compared with conventional transanal resection, TEM provides superior exposure of tumors higher up in the rectum (i.e., up to 18 cm from the anal verge). The greater precision of resection combined with low morbidity (10%, relative to that of anterior resection) and short duration of hospitalization (5.5 days) make this technique a reliable and in some cases more effective surgical approach than laparotomy and low anterior resection.

Résumé

La microchirurgie transanale endoscopique (MTE) permet une excision locale des tumeurs situées entre 4 et 18 cm au-dessus de la ligne anocutanée. La technique n’est pas encore très répandue en raison du besoin d’une instrumentation et d’outils spécifiques, une technique un peu spéciale, et une sélection stricte des patients. Le but de cette étude prospective, descriptive, a été d’analyser les indications actuelles de cette technique et d’évaluer l’utilisation de ce procédé pour le traitement du cancer du rectum. En quatre ans, nous avons traité 50 patients âgés entre 31 et 86 ans (âge moyen =64 ans) par MTE pour tumeur rectale située à 12 cm (en moyenne) de la marge anale (extrêmes 4–18 cm). Le taux de complications locales a été de 4%. Soixante-six pourcent des lésions étaient bénignes et 24% des tumeurs T1 et T2. Parmi les 12 cas de cancer, quatre ont nécessité une réopération pour excision totale du mésorectum, les huit autres patients sont actuellement sous surveillance. Pendant la période de suivi de 30,6 mois (extrêmes =11–54 mois), le taux de récidive des tumeurs T1 a été de 8,3%. La MTE est une technique chirurgicale mini-invasive qui pourrait être appliquée à un sous-groupe de la population atteint de tumeur rectale. Comparée à la résection transanale conventionnelle, la MTE permet une meilleure exposition des tumeurs du haut rectum, c’est-à-dire jusqu’à 18 cm de la marge anale. Une grande précision dans la résection, combinée à une morbidité basse (par rapport à la résection antérieure) (10%) et une courte hospitalisation (5,5 jours) rendent cette technique fiable, et dans certains cas, plus efficace que la résection antérieure par laparotomie.

Resumen

La microcirugía endoscópica transanal (TEM) permite la resección de tumores rectales localizados de 4 a 18 cm por encima del margen anal. Este procedimiento hasta ahora no se ha generalizado debido a la necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos y herramientas especiales, aspectos técnicos inusuales de abordaje y criterios estrictos para la selección de los pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio prospectivo y drescriptivo es analizar las indicaciones actualmente aceptadas para las TEM y evaluar la eficacia de esta técnica en el tratamiento del cáncer de recto. En un periodo de 4 años, 50 pacientes con edades comprendidas entre 31 y 86 años (media =64 años) fueron tratados mediante el procedimiento quirúrgico TEM, por padecer tumores rectales situados a 12 cm por encima del margen anal (rango: 4–18 cm). La tasa de complicaciones locales fue del 4%. En el 76% las lesiones fueron benignas y en el 24% malignas: tumores T1 y T2. De los 12 casos de cáncer, 4 requirieron una reintervención con resección total del mesorrecto; los otros 8 están actualmente controlados y sometidos a tratamiento. Tras un periodo de seguimiento de 30.6 meses (rango: 11–54 meses) la tasa de recidivas de tumores T1 fue del 8.3%. La TEM es una técnica quirúrgica mínimamente invasiva que puede ser muy útil en un número reducido y escogido de pacientes con cáncer de recto. Comparada con la resección transanal convencional, la TEM permite la exposición de tumores del alto recto i.e. hasta 18 cm de los márgenes del ano. La gran precisión de la resección, junto con la baja morbilidad (en comparación con la resección anterior) 10% y la corta hospitalización (5.5 días) hace que esta técnica sea, fiable y, en algunos casos, más eficaz que la laparotomía con resección anterior baja del recto.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buess, G., Hutterer, F., Theiss, J., Böbel, M., Isselhard, W., Pichlmaier, H.: Das System für die transanale endoskopische Rectumoperation. Chirurg 55:677, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mentges, B., Buess, G., Effinger, G., Manncke, K., Becker, H.D.: Indications and results of local treatment of rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 84:348, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitlow, C.B., Beck, D.E., Gathright, J.B.: Surgical excision of large rectal villous adenomas. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 5:723, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber, T.K., Petrelli, N.J.: Local excision for rectal cancer: an uncertain future. Oncology (Huntingt.) 12:933, 1998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, R.H., Hay, J.H., Larsson, S.N.: Transanal local excision of selected low rectal cancers. Am. J. Surg. 175:360, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Massari, M., De Simone, M., Cioffi, U., Rosso, L., Chiarelli, M., Gabrielli, F.: Value and limits of endorectal ultrasonography for preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 8:438, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirwan, W.O., Turnbull, R.B., Jr., Fazio, V.W., Weakley, F.L.: Pull-through operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 65:695, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buess, G.F.: Local surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 31A:1233, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Von Flüe, M., Harder, F.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): indications and limitations. Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. 124:1800, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacFarlane, J., Ryall, R., Heald, R.: Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457, 1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Winde, G., Nottberg, H, Keller, R, Schmid, K.W., Bunte, H.: Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1): transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis. Colon Rectum 39:969, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Said, S., Stippel, D.: 10 Years experiences with transanal endoscopic microsurgery: histopathologic and clinical analysis. Chirurg 67:139, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Said, S., Stippel, D.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in large, sessile adenomas of the rectum: a 10-year experience. Surg. Endosc. 9:1106, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steele, R.J., Hershman, M.J., Mortensen, N.J., Armitage, N.C., Scholefield, J.H.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery—initial experience from three centres in the United Kingdom. Br. J. Surg. 83:207. 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, L.E., Ko, S.T., Saclarides, T., Caushaj, P., Orkin, B.A., Khanduja, K.S.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: initial registry results. Dis. Colon Rectum 39:S79, 1996

  16. Swanstrom, L.L., Smiley, P., Zelko, J., Cagle, L.: Video endoscopic transanal-rectal tumor excision. Am. J. Surg. 173:383, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morschel, M., Heintz, A., Bussmann, M., Junginger, T.: Follow-up after transanal endoscopic microsurgery or transanal excision of large benign rectal polyps. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 383:320, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lezoche, E., Guerrieri, M., Paganini, A.M., Feliciotti, F.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of irradiated and nonirradiated rectal cancer: a 5-year experience. Surg. Laparosc.Endosc. 8:249, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saclarides, T.J.: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Arch. Surg. 133:595, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Turler, A., Schafer, H., Pichlmaier, H.: Role of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the palliative treatment of rectal cancer. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 32:58, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klaue, H.J. Bauer, E.: Retroperitoneal phlegmon after transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal adenoma. Chirurg 68:84, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hemingway, D., Flett, M., McKee, R.F., Finlay, I.G.: Sphincter function after transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumours. Br.J.Surg. 83:51, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kreis, M.E., Jehle, E.C., Haug, V., Manncke, K., Buess, G.F., Becker, H.D., Starlinger, M.J.: Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis.Colon Rectum 39:1116, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Banerjee, A.K., Jehle, E.C., Kreis, M.E., Schott, U.G., Claussen, C.D., Becker, H.D., Starlinger, M., Buess, G.F.: Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br. J. Surg. 83:211, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Winburn, G.B.: Surgical resection of villous adenomas of the rectum. Am. Surg. 64:1170, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Winde, G.: Outcome following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis. Colon Rectum 41:526, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heintz, A., Morschel, M., Junginger, T.: Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum. Surg. Endosc. 12:1145, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kato, K., Saito, T., Matsuda, M, Imai, M., Kasai, S., Mito, M.: Successful treatment of a rectal anastomotic stenosis by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) using the contact Nd:YAG laser. Surg. Endosc. 11:485, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Salm, R, Lampe, H., Bustos, A., Matern, U.: Experience with TEM in Germany. Endosc. Surg. Allied Technol. 2:251, 1994

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakagoe, T., Sawai, T., Uchikawa, T., Nanashima, A, Yamaguchi, H., Yasutake, T., Kusano, H., Ayabe, H.: Intragastric endoscopic surgery using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery technique. Br. J. Surg. 84:830, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Herzog, U., von Flue, M., Tondelli, P., Schuppisser, J.P.: How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer? Dis. Colon Rectum 36:127, 1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mainprize, K, Mortensen, N., Warren, B.: Early colorectal cancer: recognition, classification and treatment. Br. J. Surg. 85:469, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sizler, P.J., Seow-Cheon, F., Ho, Y.H., Leong, A.P.K.: Lymph node involvement and tumor depth in rectal cancers: an analysis of 805 patients. Dis. Colon Rectum 40:1472, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Warneke, J., Petrelli, N.J., Herrera, L.: Local recurrence after sphincter-saving resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. 158:3, 1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maingon, P., Guerif, S., Darsouni, R., Salas, S., Barillot, I., d’Hombres, A., Bone-Lepinoy, M.C., Fraisse, J., Horiot, J.C.: Conservative management of rectal adenocarcinoma by radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 40:1077, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bleday, R., Breen, E., Jessup, J.M., Burgess, A., Sentovich, S.M., Steele, G., Jr.: Prospective evaluation of local excision for small rectal cancers. Dis. Colon Rectum 40:388, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lezoche, E., Guerrieri, M., Paganini, A., Feliciotti, F., Di Pietrantonj, F.: Is transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) a valid treatment for rectal tumors? Surg. Endosc. 10:736, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim, H.K., Jessup, J.M., Beard, C.J., Bornstein, B., Cady, B., Stone, M.D., Bleday, R., Bothe, A., Jr., Steele, G., Jr., Busse, P.M.: Locally advanced rectal carcinoma: pelvic control and morbidity following preoperative radiation therapy, resection, and intraoperative radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 38:777, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mendenhall, W.M., Rout, W.R., Vauthey, J.N., Haigh, L.S., Zlotecki, R.A., Copeland, E.M., III: Conservative treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with endocavitary irradiation or wide local excision and postoperative irradiation. J. Clin, Oncol. 15:3241, 1997.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Demartines M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demartines, N., von Flüe, M.O. & Harder, F.H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: Indications and results. World J. Surg. 25, 870–875 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0043-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0043-2

Keywords

Navigation