Skip to main content
Log in

Triple-Plane Technique for Breast Augmentation: Solving Animation Deformities

  • Original Article
  • Breast
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An unpleasant consequence of subpectoral implant placement is the occurrence of animation deformities during pectoralis muscle contraction. This study aimed to review the results achieved for 524 patients undergoing the triple-plane technique with respect to loss of animation deformities. The evaluation was performed by a group of three plastic surgeons according to the Spear grading system for breast distortion using a 4-point scale. Of the 524 patients evaluated, 351 (67 %) were rated as grade 1 (no distortion), 156 (29.77 %) as grade 2 (mild distortion), 17 (3 %) as grade 3 (moderate distortion), and 0 (0 %) as 4 (severe distortion).The excellent results achieved can be explained by the horizontal sectioning of the major pectoralis muscle at the areola level to the sternal margin. In fact, it determines that superior to sectioning of the muscle, its activity remains normal, with a low degree of dynamic deformities. On the contrary, inferiorly, at the muscular–aponeurotic plane level, no activity is detected, with no resultant animation deformities.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bracaglia R, Gentileschi S, Fortunato R (2011) The “triple-plane technique” for breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:859–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bracaglia R, D’Ettorre M, Gentileschi S, Tambasco D (2012) Vacuum-assisted breast implant insertion in primary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:472–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henriksen TF, Fryzek JP, Holmich LR et al (2005) Surgical intervention and capsular contracture after breast augmentation: A prospective study of risk factors. Ann Plast Surg 54:343–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters W, Smith D, Fornasier V, Lugowski S, Ibanez D (1997) An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants. Ann Plast Surg 39:9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dempsey WC, Latham WD (1968) Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Regnault P (1977) Partial submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindsey JT (2004) The case against medial pectoral releases: a retrospective review of 315 primary breast augmentation patients. Ann Plast Surg 52:253–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual-plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft tissue relationship in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Regnault P (1977) Partial submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E, Molinari P (2004) A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pardo Mateu LM, Chamorro Hernandez JJ (1998) Partial myotomy of the pectoralis major in submuscular breast implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:228–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards A, Ritz M, Donahoe S, Southwick G (2001) Botox for contraction of pectoral muscles. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:270–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damiano Tambasco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bracaglia, R., Tambasco, D., Gentileschi, S. et al. Triple-Plane Technique for Breast Augmentation: Solving Animation Deformities. Aesth Plast Surg 37, 715–718 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0128-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0128-y

Keywords

Navigation