Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome Assessment of Breast Distortion Following Submuscular Breast Augmentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Animation deformity or breast distortion during pectoralis muscle contraction following subpectoral breast augmentation is a known entity, but its prevalence and significance remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and severity of animation deformity as well as its effect on patient satisfaction and interference with certain activities.

Methods

All procedures were performed by the senior author using a variation of a previously described dual-plane technique. The first part of this study was an evaluation of breast distortion by a group of independent observers in a series of 40 consecutive patients who underwent primary subpectoral breast augmentation. The second part of the study was a questionnaire sent to 195 consecutive patients asking about overall satisfaction, degree of animation deformity, and whether there was interference with any activities.

Results

Of the 40 patients’ photographs that were evaluated, 9 (22.5%) had no distortion, 25 (62.5%) had minimal distortion, 4 (10%) had moderate distortion, and 2 (5%) had severe distortion. Of the 195 questionnaires, there were 69 responses, a 35% response rate. Fifty-six (82%) described mild to no distortion, 7 (10%) were moderate, and 5 (7%) were severe. According to the survey, the most common activities that were problematic were lifting weights and exercising (24 and 19%, respectively). Only one (1%) patient stated that she would not recommend subpectoral positioning.

Conclusion

Although animation deformities do exist, nearly all patients in this study would still choose subpectoral positioning. Patients who may be better candidates for subglandular placement are those for whom exercise is central to their daily living. As a result of this study, surgeons and patients should have more accurate and reliable information regarding the significance of animation deformity after subpectoral breast augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pelle-Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E (2004) A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:288–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maxwell GP (1988) Management of mammary subpectoral breast distortion. Clin Plast Surg 15:601–611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz J (2006) The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to ‘dual-plane’ positioning: Technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:103S–113S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML (2006) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:188S–196S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spear SL (2006) Advances in breast augmentation: update. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:197S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams WP, Teitelbaum S, Bengston BP (2006) Breast augmentation roundtable. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:175S–187S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Cody HS, Mehrara B (2007) Breast cancer in the previously augmented breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:49–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott L. Spear.

Additional information

S. L. Spear is a paid consultant to Lifecell Corporation, Ethicon Inc., and Allergan, Inc. This study was conducted without any funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spear, S.L., Schwartz, J., Dayan, J.H. et al. Outcome Assessment of Breast Distortion Following Submuscular Breast Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 33, 44–48 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y

Keywords

Navigation