Skip to main content
Log in

A Technique to Decrease Breast Shape Deformity During Muscle Contraction in Submuscular Augmentation Mammaplasty

  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to decrease breast shape distortion during pectoralis muscle contraction following submuscular augmentation mammaplasty. We followed 348 patients who had retromuscular augmentation mammoplasty: 251 (72.1%) had polyurethane-covered gel-filled, 97 (27.9%) had textured-silicone gel-filled implants. Among the 348, 46 had surgery following the Regnault technique and 302 had surgery by the below-mentioned technique. Periareolar incision, bipartision of breast parenchima down to the fascia, undermining of breast base from the fascia downward to the inframammary sulcus or a little below it, detaching of muscle off the thoracic cage, disinsertion of abdomino-costal pectoralis attachments. Full thickness incision of pectoralis muscle on a vertical line on the nipple projection for 2–5 inches. Placing of prothesis. Drainage. Closure. No objective evaluation was used, only clinical judgments by three observers—the surgeon, a nurse and the patient herself. The results showed a definite decrease of the dynamic deformity among patients in whom the author’s technical variation was carried out. This technique allows also, for decreasing the upward pushing of the implant during pectoralis muscle contraction and facilitates stretch of the breast tissue in patients with tighter breast envelopes. Despite lack of precise measurements, conclusions drawn from clinical judgments, taken as objectively as possible, suggest that the use of this technique may offer the solution of an otherwise disturbing collateral effect, frequently seen after this operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CL Puckett GH Croll CA Reichel MJ Concannon (1987) ArticleTitleA critical look at capsular contracture in subglandular versus subpectoral mammary augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 11 23 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB3cbjvFc%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B Vazquez KS Given GC Houston (1987) ArticleTitleBrest augmentation: A review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesth Plast Surg 11 101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiA383ntlQ%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. TM Biggs RS Yarish (1990) ArticleTitleA comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85 368 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC28%2FovVU%3D Occurrence Handle2304987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WC Dempsey WD Latham (1968) ArticleTitleSubpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 42 515 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CCaD2M%2Fns1w%3D Occurrence Handle5722153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CO Griffiths Jr (1969) The submuscular implants in augmentation mammaplasty P.1009. G Sanvenero-Rosselli (Eds) Transaction of 4th International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rome, October 1967. Excepta Medica Int. Congr. Series n°174) Excepta Medica Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. RP Gruber GD Friedman (1981) ArticleTitlePeriareolar subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 67 453 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6C2M7kt1Q%3D Occurrence Handle7208688

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JB Tebbetts (1988) ArticleTitleTransaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: A nine-year experience. Clin Plast Surg 15 557 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC3snkt1E%3D Occurrence Handle3224481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. OM Ramirez MDL Heller JB Tebbetts (2002) ArticleTitleDual plane breast augmentation: Avoiding pectoralis major displacement. Plast Reconstr Surg 15 IssueID(4) 110

    Google Scholar 

  9. BK Sohn YJ Chung G Kim WY Yoon (2000) ArticleTitleSubmuscular periareolar approach to augmentation mammoplasty in Korean women. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24 6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002660010077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DA Hidalgo (2000) ArticleTitleBreast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 6

    Google Scholar 

  11. O Asplund L Gylbert G Jurell C Ward (1996) ArticleTitleTextured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: A controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 97 6

    Google Scholar 

  12. H Gray (1935) Anatomy: Descriptive and Applied, 26th Ed. Longmans London

    Google Scholar 

  13. AML Caldeira A Lucas (2000) ArticleTitlePectoralis major muscle flap: A new support approach to mammaplasty, personal technique. Aesth Plast Surg 24 58–70 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002669910011 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3gvVyisw%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. TM Ralph (1980) ArticleTitleAn anatomical study of the pectoralis major muscle as related to functioning free muscle transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 65 610 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BC28jlslc%3D Occurrence Handle7367503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. GW Hoffman LF Elliott (1987) ArticleTitleThe anatomy of the pectoral nerves and its significance to the general and plastic surgeon. Ann Surg 5 205

    Google Scholar 

  16. GP Maxwell L Perry (1995) ArticleTitleThe capsule in various types of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 5 95

    Google Scholar 

  17. P Regnault (1977) ArticleTitlePartial submuscolar breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 59 72 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSiD2sbjslE%3D Occurrence Handle831242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Pelle-Ceravolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pelle-Ceravolo, M., Del Vescovo, A., Bertozzi, E. et al. A Technique to Decrease Breast Shape Deformity During Muscle Contraction in Submuscular Augmentation Mammaplasty . Aesth Plast Surg 28, 288–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0

Keywords

Navigation