Abstract
As animals develop, their capacities to sense cues, assess threats, and perform actions change, as do the relative costs and benefits that underlie behavioural decisions. We presented ambiguous cues to test if hatching decisions of red-eyed treefrogs, Agalychnis callidryas, change developmentally following adaptive predictions based on changing costs of decision errors. These arboreal embryos hatch prematurely to escape from egg predators, cued by vibrations in attacks. Young embryos modulate hatching based on the frequency and temporal properties of cues, reducing false alarms that unnecessarily expose them to risk in the water. Since the cost of false alarms decreases developmentally, we hypothesized that hatching responses to ambiguous cues would increase. We tested this using vibration playbacks at two ages, with two sets of 3 stimuli. We matched sampling costs and varied ambiguity in either temporal or frequency properties, so one stimulus elicited high hatching (positive control) and two elicited low hatching but differed in ambiguity, based on prior results with younger embryos. Older embryos hatched faster, indicating reduced cue sampling. They responded strongly to both clear threat cues and ambiguous stimuli but little when either property clearly indicated low risk. In both experiments, we saw the greatest ontogenetic change in response to the more ambiguous stimulus. These playback experiments improve our understanding of how embryos facing risk tradeoffs make adaptive decisions based on incidental cues from predators. Ambiguity in incidental cues is ubiquitous and developmental changes in behaviour due to ontogenetic adaptation of decision processes are likely to be widespread.
Significance statement
Animals must use imperfect information to guide their behavior, and the costs of decision errors often change with development. We found the decision rules that embryos apply to ambiguous cues to deploy escape behavior change developmentally, matching adaptive predictions based on changing cost–benefit tradeoffs. Our results, consistent across two different forms of ambiguity, suggest selection has shaped behavioral development to improve how embryos use ambiguous incidental cues for defense. This work both extends and generalizes earlier experiments varying the cost of information. It cautions against oversimplifying assumptions about embryo information use—at least for species and in contexts where a history of strong selective tradeoffs may have honed their capacity to make a key decision well—and demonstrates the value of vibration playbacks and embryo hatching behavior for research in animal cognition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data collected for and analyzed in this paper is available on Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cnp5hqc4t).
Code availability
Custom code is available upon request.
References
Andrewartha HG (1952) Diapause in relation to the ecology of insects. Biol Rev 27:50–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1952.tb01363.x
Bailey WJ (1991) Acoustic behavior of insects: an evolutionary perspective. Chapman and Hall, London
Balci F, Freestone D, Gallistel CR (2009) Risk assessment in man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:2459–2463. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812709106
Ball RE, Oliver MK, Gill AB (2016) Early life sensory ability—ventilatory responses of thornback ray embryos (Raja clavata) to predator-type electric fields. Dev Neurobiol 76:721–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22355
Barsz K, Ison JR, Snell KB, Walton JP (2002) Behavioral and neural measures of auditory temporal acuity in aging humans and mice. Neurobiol Aging 23:565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00008-8
Bate M (1999) Development of motor behaviour. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:670–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00031-8
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bonachea LA, Ryan MJ (2011) Predation risk increases permissiveness for heterospecific advertisement calls in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim Behav 82:347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.009
Boncoraglio G, Saino N (2007) Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct Ecol 21:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01207.x
Bouskila A, Blumstein DT (1992) Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment: predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat 139:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1086/285318
Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209
Buckley CR, Michael SF, Irschick DJ (2005) Early hatching decreases jumping performance in a direct-developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Funct Ecol 19:67–72
Caldwell MS, McDaniel JG, Warkentin KM (2009) Frequency information in the vibration-cued escape hatching of red-eyed treefrogs. J Exp Biol 212:566–575. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.026518
Caldwell MS, McDaniel JG, Warkentin KM (2010) Is it safe? Red-eyed treefrog embryos assessing predation risk use two features of rain vibrations to avoid false alarms. Anim Behav 79:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.005
Charlton BD, Reby D, McComb K (2008) Effect of combined source (F0) and filter (formant) variation on red deer hind responses to male roars. J Acoust Soc Am 123:2936–2943. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2896758
Chivers DP, Kiesecker JM, Marco A, Devito J, Anderson MT, Blaustein AR (2001) Predator-induced life history changes in amphibians: egg predation induces hatching. Oikos 92:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920116.x
Cohen KL, Seid MA, Warkentin KM (2016) How embryos escape from danger: the mechanism of rapid, plastic hatching in red-eyed treefrogs. J Exp Biol 219:1875–1883. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.139519
Cohen KL, Piacentino ML, Warkentin KM (2019) Two types of hatching gland cells facilitate escape hatching at different developmental stages in red-eyed treefrogs, Agalychnis callidryas (Anura: Phyllomedusidae). Biol J Linn Soc 126:751–767
Cole C (1993) Shannon revisited: information in terms of uncertainty. J Am Soc Inf Sci 44:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199305)44:4%3c204::AID-ASI3%3e3.0.CO;2-4
Dall SRX, Giraldeau L-A, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010
Delia J, Rivera-Ordonez JM, Salazar-Nicholls MJ, Warkentin KM (2019) Hatching plasticity and the adaptive benefits of extended embryonic development in glassfrogs. Evol Ecol 33:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-018-9963-2
Doody JS, Paull P (2013) Hitting the ground running: environmentally cued hatching in a lizard. Copeia 2013:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-12-111
Doody JS, Stewart B, Camacho C, Christian K (2012) Good vibrations? Sibling embryos expedite hatching in a turtle. Anim Behav 83:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.006
Elias DO, Mason AC (2014) The role of wave and substrate heterogeneity in vibratory communication: practical issues in studying the effect of vibratory environments in communication. In: Cocroft RB, Gogala M, Hill PSM, Wessel A (eds) Studying vibrational communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–247
Endo J, Takanashi T, Mukai H, Numata H (2019) Egg-cracking vibration as a cue for stink bug siblings to synchronize hatching. Curr Biol 29:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.024
Ewing A (1989) Arthropod bioacoustics: neurobiology and behavior. Cornell University, Ithaca
Geipel I, Smeekes MJ, Halfwerk W, Page RA (2019) Noise as an informational cue for decision-making: the sound of rain delays bat emergence. J Exp Biol 222:jeb192005. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.192005
Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42:615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80245-3
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Getty T, Krebs JR (1985) Lagging partial preferences for cryptic prey: a signal detection analysis of great tit foraging. Am Nat 125:39–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/284327
Gomez-Mestre I, Wiens JJ, Warkentin KM (2008) Evolution of adaptive plasticity: risk-sensitive hatching in neotropical leaf-breeding treefrogs. Ecol Monogr 78:205–224. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0529.1
Gomez-Mestre I, Kulkarni S, Buchholz DR (2013) Mechanisms and consequences of developmental acceleration in tadpoles responding to pond drying. PLoS ONE 8:e84266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084266
Griem JN, Martin KLM (2000) Wave action: the environmental trigger for hatching in the California grunion Leuresthes tenuis (Teleostei: Atherinopsidae). Mar Biol 137:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000329
Guibé M, Poirel N, Houdé O, Dickel L (2012) Food imprinting and visual generalization in embryos and newly hatched cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav 84:213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.035
Gyllström M, Hansson L-A (2004) Dormancy in freshwater zooplankton: Induction, termination and the importance of benthic-pelagic coupling. Aquat Sci 66:274–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-004-0712-y
Hall WG, Oppenheim RW (1987) Developmental psychobiology: prenatal, perinatal, and early postnatal aspects of behavioral development. Annu Rev Psychol 38:91–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.000515
Hamann I, Gleich O, Klump GM, Kittel MC, Strutz J (2004) Age-dependent changes of gap detection in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-003-3041-2
Harshaw C, Lickliter R (2011) Biased embryos: prenatal experience alters the postnatal malleability of auditory preferences in bobwhite quail. Dev Psychobiol 53:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20521
Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214
Hempleman SC, Pilarski JQ (2011) Prenatal development of respiratory chemoreceptors in endothermic vertebrates. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 178:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2011.04.027
Ison JR, Agrawal P, Pak J, Vaughn WJ (1998) Changes in temporal acuity with age and with hearing impairment in the mouse: a study of the acoustic startle reflex and its inhibition by brief decrements in noise level. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424382
Judge KA, Ting JJ, Gwynne DT (2014) Condition dependence of female choosiness in a field cricket. J Evol Biol 27:2529–2540. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12509
Jung J (2021) Developmental changes in vibration sensing and vibration-cued hatching decisions in red-eyed treefrogs. PhD dissertation, Boston University, Boston
Jung J, McDaniel JG, Warkentin KM (2017) Ontogeny of vibration-cued escape-hatching in red-eyed treefrogs: two reasons older embryos hatch more. Integr Comp Biol 57:e82. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx001
Jung J, Kim SJ, Pérez Arias SM, McDaniel JG, Warkentin KM (2019) How do red-eyed treefrog embryos sense motion in predator attacks? Assessing the role of vestibular mechanoreception. J Exp Biol 222:jeb206052. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.206052
Jung J, Serrano-Rojas SJ, Warkentin KM (2020) Multimodal mechanosensing enables treefrog embryos to escape egg-predators. J Exp Biol 223:jeb236141. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.236141
Kawamura G, Ishida K (1985) Changes in sense organ morphology and behaviour with growth in the flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 51:155–165. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.51.155
Krebs JR, Dawkins R (1984) Animal signals: mind-reading and manipulation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 380–402
Leavell BC, Bernal XE (2019) The cognitive ecology of stimulus ambiguity: a predator–prey perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 34:1048–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.004
Li D (2002) Hatching responses of subsocial spitting spiders to predation risk. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2155–2161
Lindström K, Lehtonen TK (2013) Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby. Proc R Soc B 280:20130983. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0983
Martin K, Bailey K, Moravek C, Carlson K (2011) Taking the plunge: California grunion embryos emerge rapidly with environmentally cued hatching. Integr Comp Biol 51:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr037
Maynard-Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Michelsen A, Fink F, Gogala M, Traue D (1982) Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299304
Mokkonen M, Lindstedt C (2016) The evolutionary ecology of deception. Biol Rev 91:1020–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12208
Mortimer B (2017) Biotremology: do physical constraints limit the propagation of vibrational information? Anim Behav 130:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.015
Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869. https://doi.org/10.1086/283219
Mukai H, Hironaka M, Tojo S, Nomakuchi S (2012) Maternal vibration induces synchronous hatching in a subsocial burrower bug. Anim Behav 84:1443–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.012
Mukai H, Hironaka M, Tojo S, Nomakuchi S (2014) Maternal vibration: an important cue for embryo hatching in a subsocial shield bug. PLoS ONE 9:e87932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087932
Munoz NE, Blumstein DT (2012) Multisensory perception in uncertain environments. Behav Ecol 23:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr220
Narins PM, Capranica RR (1976) Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Science 192:378–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257772
Noorani I (2014) LATER models of neural decision behavior in choice tasks. Front Integr Neurosci 8:67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00067
Oberst S, Bann G, Lai JCS, Evans TA (2017) Cryptic termites avoid predatory ants by eavesdropping on vibrational cues from their footsteps. Ecol Lett 20:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12727
Ord TJ, Peters RA, Clucas B, Stamps JA (2007) Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0263
Oyarzun FX, Strathmann RR (2011) Plasticity of hatching and the duration of planktonic development in marine invertebrates. Integr Comp Biol 51:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr009
Pezaro N, Doody JS, Green B, Thompson MB (2013) Hatching and residual yolk internalization in lizards: evolution, function and fate of the amnion. Evol Dev 15:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/ede.12019
R Development Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org
Rhebergen F, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA, Halfwerk W (2015) Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions. Proc R Soc B 282:20151403. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1403
Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/283568
Roberts DM (2001) Egg hatching of mosquitoes Aedes caspius and Ae. vittatus stimulated by water vibrations. Med Vet Entomol 15:215–218. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00303.x
Roitberg BD (1990) Optimistic and pessimistic fruit flies: evaluating fitness consequences of estimation errors. Behaviour 114:65–82
Romagny S, Darmaillacq A-S, Guibé M, Bellanger C, Dickel L (2012) Feel, smell and see in an egg: emergence of perception and learning in an immature invertebrate, the cuttlefish embryo. J Exp Biol 215:4125–4130. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.078295
RStudio Team (2019) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston. http://www.rstudio.com/
Ryan MJ, Rand SA (2001) Feature weighting in signal recognition and discrimination by túngara frogs. In: Ryan MJ (ed) Anuran communication. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 86–101
Ryan MJ, Rand W, Hurd PL, Phelps SM, Rand AS (2003) Generalization in response to mate recognition signals. Am Nat 161:380–394. https://doi.org/10.1086/367588
Sandeman R, Sandeman D (2003) Development, growth, and plasticity in the crayfish olfactory system. Microsc Res Tech 60:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10266
Schaub A, Ostwald J, Siemers BM (2008) Foraging bats avoid noise. J Exp Biol 211:3174–3180. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.022863
Schmidt KA, Dall SRX, Gils JAV (2010) The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions. Oikos 119:304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17573.x
Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101
Sih A, Moore RD (1993) Delayed hatching of salamander eggs in response to enhanced larval predation risk. Am Nat 142:947–960. https://doi.org/10.1086/285583
Sisneros JA, Tricas TC, Luer CA (1998) Response properties and biological function of the skate electrosensory system during ontogeny. J Comp Physiol A 183:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050237
Stevens M (2013) Sensory ecology, behaviour, and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
Taylor RC, Klein BA, Ryan MJ (2011) Inter-signal interaction and uncertain information in anuran multimodal signals. Curr Zool 57:153–161
Tinbergen N (1952) “Derived” activities; their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. Q Rev Biol 27:1–32
Tobias JA, Aben J, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP, Halfwerk W, Slabberkoorn H, Seddon N (2010) Song divergence by sensory drive in Amazonian birds. Evolution 64:2820–2839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01067.x
Touchon JC, Gomez-Mestre I, Warkentin KM (2006) Hatching plasticity in two temperate anurans: responses to a pathogen and predation cues. Can J Zool 84:556–563. https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-058
Touchon JC, McCoy MW, Vonesh JR, Warkentin KM (2013) Effects of plastic hatching timing carry over through metamorphosis in red-eyed treefrogs. Ecology 94:850–860
Trimmer PC, Houston AI, Marshall JAR, Mendl MT, Paul ES, McNamara JM (2011) Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians. Anim Cogn 14:465–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0387-4
Velilla E, Polajnar J, Virant-Doberlet M, Commandeur D, Simon R, Cornelissen JHC, Ellers J, Halfwerk W (2020) Variation in plant leaf traits affects transmission and detectability of herbivore vibrational cues. Ecol Evol 10:12277–12289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6857
Vonesh JR (2000) Dipteran predation on the arboreal eggs of four Hyperolius frog species in Western Uganda. Copeia 2000:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)000[0560:DPOTAE]2.0.CO;2
Warkentin KM (1995) Adaptive plasticity in hatching age: a response to predation risk trade-offs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3507–3510. https://doi.org/10.1073/Pnas.92.8.3507
Warkentin KM (1999) Effects of hatching age on development and hatchling morphology in the red-eyed treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas. Biol J Linn Soc 68:443–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1095-8312.1999.Tb01180.X
Warkentin KM (2002) Hatching timing, oxygen availability, and external gill regression in the treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/339214
Warkentin KM (2005) How do embryos assess risk? Vibrational cues in predator-induced hatching of red-eyed treefrogs. Anim Behav 70:59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.019
Warkentin KM (2011a) Environmentally cued hatching across taxa: embryos respond to risk and opportunity. Integr Comp Biol 51:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr017
Warkentin KM (2011b) Plasticity of hatching in amphibians: evolution, trade-offs, cues and mechanisms. Integr Comp Biol 51:111–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr046
Warkentin KM (2017) Development of red-eyed treefrog embryos: a staging table for integrative research on environmentally cued hatching. Integr Comp Biol 57:E175. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx001;Figshareposter10.6084/m9.figshare.10070558.v1
Warkentin KM, Caldwell MS (2009) Assessing risk: embryos, information, and escape hatching. In: Dukas R, Ratcliffe JM (eds) Cognitive Ecology II. University of Chicago Press, Illinois, pp 177–200
Warkentin KM, Caldwell MS, McDaniel JG (2006) Temporal pattern cues in vibrational risk assessment by embryos of the red-eyed treefrog, Agalychnis callidryas. J Exp Biol 209:1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02150
Warkentin KM, Caldwell MS, Siok TD, D’Amato AT, McDaniel JG (2007) Flexible information sampling in vibrational assessment of predation risk by red-eyed treefrog embryos. J Exp Biol 210:614–619. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.001362
Warkentin KM, Cuccaro Diaz J, Güell BA, Jung J, Kim SJ, Cohen KL (2017) Developmental onset of escape-hatching responses in red-eyed treefrogs depends on cue type. Anim Behav 129:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.05.008
Warkentin KM, Jung J, Rueda Solano LA, McDaniel JG (2019) Ontogeny of escape-hatching decisions: vibrational cue use changes as predicted from costs of sampling and false alarms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2663-2
Warkentin KM, Jung J, McDaniel JG (2021) Research approaches in mechanosensory-cued hatching and the iterative development of playback methods for red-eyed treefrog embryos. In: Hill PSM, Mazzoni V, Stritih Peljhan N, Virant-Doberlet M, Wessel A (eds) Biotremology: physiology, ecology, and evolution. Springer Nature, New York
Whittington ID, Kearn GC (1988) Rapid hatching of mechanically-disturbed eggs of the monogenean gill parasite Diclidophora luscae, with observations on sedimentation of egg bundles. Int J Parasitol 18:847–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(88)90127-0
Whittington ID, Kearn GC (2011) Hatching strategies in monogenean (Platyhelminth) parasites that facilitate host infection. Integr Comp Biol 51:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr003
Wiedenmayer CP (2009) Plasticity of defensive behavior and fear in early development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.11.004
Wiegmann DD, Weinersmith KL, Seubert SM (2010) Multi-attribute mate choice decisions and uncertainty in the decision process: a generalized sequential search strategy. J Math Biol 60:543–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0274-7
Wilcox SR, Jackson RR, Gentile K (1996) Spiderweb smokescreens: spider trickster uses background noise to mask stalking movements. Anim Behav 51:313–326. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0031
Willink B, Palmer MS, Landberg T, Vonesh JR, Warkentin KM (2014) Environmental context shapes immediate and cumulative costs of risk-induced early hatching. Evol Ecol 28:103–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9661-z
Winters S, Allen WL, Higham JP (2020) The structure of species discrimination signals across a primate radiation. eLife 9:e47428. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47428
Wourms JP (1972) The developmental biology of annual fishes. III. Pre-embryonic and embryonic diapause of variable duration in the eggs of annual fishes. J Exp Zool 182:389–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401820310
Wu C-H, Elias DO (2014) Vibratory noise in anthropogenic habitats and its effect on prey detection in a web-building spider. Anim Behav 90:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.006
Acknowledgements
We thank Ana Ospina, Rachel Snyder, Adeline Almanzar, María José Salazar Nicholls, Chloe Fouilloux, and Estefany Caroline Guevara Molina for assistance during field research. We thank members of the Gamboa Frog Group at STRI, Team Treefrog at BU, and Peter Buston for multiple discussions of this research and helpful comments on the manuscript. Finally, we thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments and suggestions that helped us to improve this manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (IOS-1354072 to KMW and JGM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: JJ and KMW.
Methodology: JJ, JGM, and KMW.
Software: JJ and JGM.
Validation: JJ and KMW.
Formal analysis: JJ.
Investigation: JJ and KMW.
Data curation: JJ.
Writing—original draft: JJ.
Writing—review and editing: JJ, JGM, and KMW.
Visualization: JJ.
Supervision: KMW.
Project administration: KMW.
Funding acquisition: JGM and KMW.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the use of animals were followed. This research was conducted under permits from the Panamanian Environmental Ministry (SE/A-55–17 and SC/A-10–18) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (2017–0601-2020–2).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by A. Taylor Baugh
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, J., McDaniel, J.G. & Warkentin, K.M. Escape-hatching decisions show adaptive ontogenetic changes in how embryos manage ambiguity in predation risk cues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 75, 141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03070-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03070-9