Skip to main content
Log in

Double allomimesis of advancing and retreating individuals maintains cohesion in exploring groups of nomadic caterpillars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group-living entails that animals maintain cohesion during collective locomotion: This cohesion often requires that each individual respond to cues from several neighbours. Social insects generally use pheromone trails to integrate information from multiple group members. We demonstrate mechanisms used by nomadic social caterpillars to maintain cohesion when exploring off-trail. Our results show that forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria) use double allomimesis, responding to cues from both advancing and retreating neighbours. A group-level experiment measured cohesion and persistence of locomotion according to caterpillar age and group size. An individual-level experiment quantified responses to cues from neighbours, and a model was used to predict the group-level patterns that emerge from these responses. We show that double allomimesis generates feedback that maintains group cohesion, but at the price of locomotion efficiency, particularly in small groups of young caterpillars. We also show that the importance of allomimesis decreases as caterpillars age and show lesser responses to social cues. Finally, we demonstrate that, especially in the early instars, efficient collective locomotion is only possible in the large group sizes typically of field colonies.

Significance statement

Simple do-what-your-neighbour-is-doing mechanisms underlie mass collective locomotion of gregarious animals. Social insects generally use pheromone trails to follow each other. How then to stay together when exploring away from these trails? Forest tent caterpillars provide an intriguing example: They follow trails faithfully, but on unexplored territory turn back frequently to rejoin the trail behind them. We show how direct physical contact with advancing and retreating neighbours provides an explanation. An off-trail caterpillar turns back less often if it is propelled by a forward-moving neighbour, but more often if that neighbour turns back. This dual imitation keeps the group together, but at the price of efficient movement, especially in small groups. Groups as large as natural colonies seldom turn back due to the steady supply of advancing neighbours to propel forward and eventually replace vanguard individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addy ND (1969) Rearing the forest tent caterpillar on an artificial diet. J Econ Entomol 62:270–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astudillo Fernandez A, Deneubourg JL (2011) On following behaviour as a mechanism for collective movement. J Theor Biol 284:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Lecomte V, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008) Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:1232–1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl J, Sumpter DJ, Couzin ID, Hale J, Despland E, Miller E, Simpson SJ (2006) From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312:1402–1406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colasurdo N, Dussutour A, Despland E (2007) Do food protein and carbohydrate content influence the pattern of feeding and the tendency to explore of forest tent caterpillars? J Insect Physiol 53:1160–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colasurdo N, Despland E (2005) Social cues and following behavior in the forest tent caterpillar. J Insect Behav 18:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. TREE 20:449–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JT (2006) The other insect societies. Belknap Press, Cambridge, 812 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa JT, Ross KG (2003) Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect. Proc Roy Soc B 270:1697–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JT, Ross KG (1993) Seasonal decline in the intracolony genetic relatedness of eastern tent caterpillars: implications for social evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin ID, Krause J (2003) Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv Study Behav 32:1–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despland E (2013) Plasticity of collective behavior in a nomadic early spring folivore. Frontiers Physiol 4:54. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00054

  • Despland E, Le Huu A (2007) Pros and cons of group-living in the forest tent caterpillar: separating the roles of silk and of grouping. Entomol Exp App 122:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despland E, Simpson SJ (2006) Resource distribution mediates synchronization of physiological rhythms in locust groups. Proc Roy Soc B 273:1517–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despland E, Hamzeh S (2004) Ontogenetic changes in social behaviour in the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dostalkova I, Spinka M (2007) Synchronization of behaviour in pairs: the role of communication and consequences in timing. Anim Behav 74:1735–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussutour A, Nicolis SC, Despland E, Simpson SJ (2008) Individual differences influence collective behaviour in social caterpillars. Anim Behav 76:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussutour A, Colasurdo N, Nicolis SC, Despland E (2007) How do ants and social caterpillars collectively make decisions? In: Hardy-Vallée B (ed) Cognitive decision-making: empirical and foundational issues. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, pp 48–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre JH (1899) Souvenirs Entomologiques: La Processionnaire du Pin: la procession. Série VI, Chapitre 20. France

  • Fitzgerald TD (1995) The tent caterpillars. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 303 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD, Costa JT (1986) Trail-based communication and foraging behavior of young colonies of forest tent caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 79:999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautrais J, Michelina P, Sibbald A, Bon R, Deneubourg JL (2007) Allelomimetic synchronization in merino sheep. Anim Behav 74:1443–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haccou P, Meelis E (1992) Statistical analysis of behavioural data: an approach based on time-structured models. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert-Read JE, Perna A, Mann RP, Schaerf TM, Sumpter DJT, Ward AJW (2001) Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:18726–18731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Dussutour A, Fourcassié V (2012) Key factors for the emergence of collective decisions in invertebrates. Frontiers Neurosci 6:121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Rivault C, Deneubourg JL, Blanco S, Fournier R, Jost C, Theraulaz G (2005) Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches. Anim Behav 69:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure M, Despland E (2011) Defensive responses by a social caterpillar are tailored to different predators and change with larval instar and group size. Naturwissenschaften 98:425–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClure M, Ralph M, Despland E (2011) Group leadership depends on energetic state in a nomadic collective foraging caterpillar. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1573–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure M, Despland E (2010) Collective foraging pattern of field colonies of Malacosoma disstria caterpillars. Can Entomol 142:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J, Janzen D, Hallwachs W (2006) 100 Caterpillars. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemiroff L, Despland E (2007) Do forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria) exhibit persistent individual differences in behaviour? Evidence for temperament in an outbreaking insect. Can J Zool 85:1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters MI, Despland E (2006) Plasticity in forest tent caterpillar self-organized collective foraging. Ethology 112:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit O, Bon R (2010) Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Behav Process 84:635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit O, Gautrais J, Leca JB, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J (2009) Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Proc Roy Soc B 276:3495–3503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pillot MH, Deneubourg JL (2010) Collective movements, initiation and stops: diversity of situations and law of parsimony. Behav Process 84:657–661

  • Pillot MH, Gautrais J, Bon R, Deneubourg JL (2011) Scalable rules for coherent group motion in a gregarious vertebrate. PLoS ONE 6:e14487 

  • Robison DJ (1993) The feeding ecology of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hübner, among hybrid poplar clones, Populus spp. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin

  • Santana AFK, McClure M, Ethier J, Despland E (2015) Exploration costs promote conservative collective foraging in the social caterpillar Malacosoma disstria. Anim Behav 105:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumpter DJ (2010) Collective animal behavior. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Viscido SV, Parrish JK, Grünbaum D (2005) The effect of population size and number of influential neighbors on the emergent properties of fish schools. Ecol Model 183:347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward A, Sumpter DJ, Couzin ID, Hart P, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:6948–6953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for a Discovery grant to E.D. and for Undergraduate Student Research Awards to D.G. and L.M. Thanks also to the Great Lakes Forestry Centre of the Canadian Forest Service for providing the insects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Despland.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Naug

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Despland, E., Gervais, D. & Morcos, L. Double allomimesis of advancing and retreating individuals maintains cohesion in exploring groups of nomadic caterpillars. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 56 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2285-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2285-5

Keywords

Navigation