Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal decline in intracolony genetic relatedness in eastern tent caterpillars: implications for social evolution

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Genetic relatedness in social insect colonies may vary spatially or temporally as a result of changes in colony membership due to immigration or to variation in patterns of maternity and paternity. We estimated relatedness for eastern tent caterpillars (Malacosoma americanum) in laboratory colonies derived from egg masses using multilocus genotypic data derived from electrophoresis. This estimate is compared with estimates obtained from colony samples taken in the field at four intervals spanning the larval developmental season. We found that average intracolony relatedness is close to 0.5 initially but declines through the developmental season due to colony merging, showing that caterpillars do not discriminate between siblings and nonsiblings in order to preserve colony family structure. Using the intracolony values together with relatedness values for higher levels of population structure, we estimated the effective mean number of simple families represented in single colonies through the season. The overall effective number of families per tent increased from one at the time of eclosion to 1.3 by the end of the season. Average intracolony relatedness remained relatively high despite the occurrence of colony merging, apparently as a result of the low density of tents on most trees, combined with high relatedness within the original colonies. Thus, high intracolony relatedness is maintained in M. americanum populations through the effects of adult dispersal, mating, and oviposition patterns, rather than through behavioral discrimination mechanisms of the larvae. These findings underscore the importance of considering the causes of temporal variation in genetic relatedness as well as the consequences for the indirect component of inclusive fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bieman DN, Winter JA (1983) Mating behavior of Malacosoma disstria at two levels of mate competition. Fl Entomol 66:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Page RE Jr (1991) Intra- and interspecific nestmate recognition in Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Insect Behav 4:463–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher GE (1959) Winter rearing of tent caterpillars, Malacosoma spp. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Can Entomol 91:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1984) The evolution of egg clustering by butterflies and other insects. Am Nat 123:276–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1980) Genetical structure of social insect populations. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Brückner D (1981) Sperm clumping and the population genetics of Hymenoptera. Am Nat 117:561–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump D, Silverstein RM, Williams HJ, Fitzgerald TD (1987) Identification of trail pheromone of larva of eastern tent caterpillar Malacosoma americanum (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). J Chem Ecol 13:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort GC (1981) Presocial insects. In: Hermann H (ed) Social insects, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 199–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans HE (1977) Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the evolution of insect sociality. BioScience 27:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD (1976) Trail marking by larvae of the eastern tent caterpillar. Science 194:961–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD, Peterson SC (1983) Elective recruitment communication by the eastern tent caterpillar (Malacosoma americanum). Anim Behav 31:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald TD, Willer DE (1983) Tent-building behavior of the eastern tent caterpillar Malacosoma americanum (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 56:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher DJC, Michener C (eds) (1987) Kin recognition in animals. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1984) Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology, an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 62–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition in animals. Am Sci 71:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman AJ, Krebs J (1987) Predation and group living. Trends Ecol Evol 2:31–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Michener CD (1972) Evolution of sociality in insects. Q Rev Biol 47:131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DE, Wade MJ, Breden FJ, Wohltman M (1988) Spatial and temporal variation in group relatedness: evidence from the imported willow leaf beetle. Evolution 42:184–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE Jr, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization, and social evolution. Am Nat 119:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1983) Genetic differentiation within subdivided populations of Formica ants. Evolution 37:1010–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1984) Genotypic correlation and regression in social groups: multiple alleles, multiple loci and subdivided populations. Genetics 107:307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1989) Estimating relatedness in social groups. Trends Ecol Evol 4:353–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Popul Biol 21:171–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SC (1986) Host specificity of trail marking to foliage by eastern tent caterpillars, Malacosoma americanum. Entomol Exp Appl 42:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SC (1988) Chemical trail marking and following by caterpillars of Malacosoma neustria. J Chem Ecol 14:815–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1982) Basking behaviour in larvae of the butterfly Euphydras aurinia. Oikos 38:308–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1993) Genetic relatedness and its components in polygynous colonies of social insects. In: Keller L, Cherix D (eds) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG (1986) Kin selection and the problem of sperm utilization in social insects. Nature 323:798–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG (1988) Differential reproduction in multiple-queen colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:341–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross KG (1993) The breeding system of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: effects on colony genetic structure. Am Nat (in press)

  • Ross KG, Carpenter JM (1991) Population genetic structure, relatedness, and breeding systems. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp 451–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker DD, Costa JT III, Ross KG (1993) Estimates of heterozygosity in two social insects using a large number of electrophoretic markers. Heredity (in press)

  • Stamp NE (1980) Egg deposition patterns in butterflies: Why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Am Nat 115:367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr FW, Cook EF (1968) A revision of the genus Malacosoma Hübner in North America (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae): Systematics, biology, immatures, and parasites. US Natl Mus Bull 276

  • Strassmann JE (1981) Parasitoids, predators and group size in the paper wasp, Polistes exclamans. Ecology 62:1233–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Queller DC (1989) Ecological determinants of social evolution. In: Breed MD, Page RE Jr (eds) The genetics of social evolution. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Queller DC, Hughes CR (1988) Predation and the evolution of sociality in the paper wasp, Polistes bellicosus. Ecology 69:1497–1505

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:369–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki Y, Shiotsu Y (1982) Group feeding as a strategy for exploiting food resources in the burnet moth Pryeria sinica. Oecologia 55:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1985) The influence of multiple inseminations and multiple foundresses of social evolution. J Theor Biol 112:109–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, McCracken GF (1985) On estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 39:1169–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JL (1939) The mating and egg-laying of Malacosoma americana (Lepid.: Lasiocampidae). Ent News 1:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen (London) 15:323–354

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: J.T. Costa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, J.T., Ross, K.G. Seasonal decline in intracolony genetic relatedness in eastern tent caterpillars: implications for social evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 47–54 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172222

Keywords

Navigation