Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual-level patterns of division of labor in honeybees highlight flexibility in colony-level developmental mechanisms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Honeybee division of labor (DOL) has become a model system for exploring the genetic basis of complex traits and phenotypic plasticity. Although many highly informative behavioral studies have been conducted on this topic (both at the cohort and individual levels), most studies have focused on a few behavioral acts, such as the age of first foraging. Few studies have recorded large numbers of relatively complete individual-level patterns of DOL. Such fine-scale patterns would lay the foundation for rigorous molecular analyses of this phenomenon and allow us to differentiate between competing mechanistic models of DOL. Here, we record over 100 individual-level DOL patterns of bees living under natural conditions. We found that the transitions between castes (polyphenism states) are often gradual, with bees being in multiple castes at once. This is contrary to the traditional view that changes are abrupt. We also found that bees often skip castes, a key prediction of a recent model of DOL. We further confirm variation in the rate at which bees pass through castes and the age of first foraging. Taken together, these results greatly improve our understanding of this model system and allow for a strong revision of current models of honeybee DOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amdam GV, Omholt SW (2003) The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. J Theor Biol 223:451–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G, Quenet B, Papin C, Masson C, Kirchner WH (2002) Intra-colonial variability in the dance communication in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Ethology 108:751–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AM, Robinson GE (2011) Behavior and the dynamic genome. Science 332:1161–1162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shahar Y, Robichon A, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE (2002) Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296:741–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JF (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW, Page RE (1988) Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW, Page RE (1991) Evolutionary genetics of division of labor in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Am Nat 138:69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SB (2008) Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134:25–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman NC, Oldroyd BP, Hughes WHO (2007) Differential reponses of honeybee (Apis mellifera) patrilines to changes in stimuli for the generalist tasks of nursing and foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1185–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duong N, Schneider SS (2008) Intra-patriline variability in the performance of the vibration signal and waggle dance in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Ethology 114:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elekonich MM, Roberts SP (2005) Physiological underpinnings of behavioral development in honey bees. Comp Biochem Physiol 141:362–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischman BJ, Woodard SH, Robinson GE (2011) Molecular evolutionary analyses of insect societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:10847–10854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Tofts C (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48:470–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussnecker BL, McKenzie AM, Grozinger CM (2011) cGMP modulates responses to queen mandibular gland pheromone in worker honey bees. J Comp Physiol A 197:939–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380:121–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grozinger CM, Sharabash NM, Whitfield CW, Robinson GE (2003) Pheromone-mediated gene expression in the honey bee brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14519–14525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grozinger CM, Fan YL, Hoover SER, Winston ML (2007) Genome-wide analysis reveals differences in brain gene expression patterns associated with caste and reproductive status in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Mol Ecol 16:4837–4848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11726–11729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1996) Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2002) Reallocation of labor in honeybee colonies during heat stress: the relative roles of task switching and the activation of reserve labor. Behav Ecol Sociol 51:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2003) Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labor and behavioral flexibility. Proc R Soc B 270:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2005) Limited flexibility in the temporal caste system of the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2008) Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2010a) Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2010b) Communication in social insect colonies: the roles of signals and cues in group level coordination of action. Behav Ecol 21:1373–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Linksvayer TA (2010) Deconstructing the superorganism: social physiology, groundplans, and sociogenomics. Q Rev Biol 85:57–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Tsutsui ND (2011) Taxonomically restricted genes are associated with the evolution of sociality in the honey bee. BMC Genomics 12:164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Z Vergl Physiol 34:299–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AJ, Breed MD, Moor MJ (1987) The guard honey bee: ontogeny and behavioural variability of workers performing a specialized task. Anim Behav 35:1159–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Thompson GJ (2007) Behavioural genetics of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Adv Insect Physiol 33:1–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE (1991) The genetics of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Adv Insect Physiol 23:117–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE, Britton DS, Fondrk MK (1992) Genotypic variability for rates of behavioral development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L). Behav Ecol 3:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Fondrk MK, Hunt GJ, Guzman-Novoa E, Humphries MA, Nguyen K, Greene AS (2000) Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior. J Hered 91:474–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Huang ZY, Winston ML, Robinson GE (1998) Queen mandibular gland pheromone influences worker honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging ontogeny and juvenile hormone titers. J Insect Physiol 44:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Anderson C (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. Insect Soc 46:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravary R, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Chaline N, Jaisson P (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol 17:1308–1312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. Am Nat 160:S160–S172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE, Fernald RD, Clayton DF (2008) Genes and social behavior. Science 322:896–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rueppell O, Pankiw T, Nielsen DI, Fondrk MK, Beye M, Page RE (2004) The genetic architecture of the behavioral ontogeny of foraging in honeybee workers. Genetics 167:1767–1779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz DJ, Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1998) Effects of colony food shortage on behavioral development in honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE (2008) Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labor in insect societies. Nat Rev Genet 9:735–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stabentheiner A, Kovac H, Brodschneider R (2010) Honeybee colony thermoregulation—regulatory mechanisms and contribution of individuals in dependence on age, location and thermal stress. Plos One 5(1):e8967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL (2000) Perspective: evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution 54:1079–1091

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees, and naked mole rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7:346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toth AL, Kantarovich S, Meisel AF, Robinson GE (2005) Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in honey bees. J Exp Biol 208:4641–4649

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener J, Lorenz MW, Bienefeld K (2009) Physiological consequences of prolonged nursing in the honey bee. Insect Soc 56:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmuller A (2004) The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response. Behav Ecol 15:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield CW, Ben-Shahar Y, Brillet C, Leoncini I, Crauser D, Le Conte Y, Rodriguez-Zas S, Robinson GE (2006) Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16068–16075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University of California, Davis. We thank Amanda Izzo and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript. The work described here complies with the laws of the USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Brian R. Johnson & Elizabeth Frost

Authors
  1. Brian R. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Frost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian R. Johnson.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Rueppell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, B.R., Frost, E. Individual-level patterns of division of labor in honeybees highlight flexibility in colony-level developmental mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 923–930 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1341-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1341-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation