Abstract
A well-regulated division of labor has been one of the core adaptations leading to the success of the social insects. Honeybee division of labor has been classically viewed as a sequence of age-related changes in task performance. Kolmes questioned this view arguing that his studies did not support the existence of any age-related within-nest specialization. To resolve this controversy, Kolmes and Seeley conducted a joint study with mixed results. They found support for a cell cleaning caste, but diverged on whether their results supported distinct nursing and middle age castes. In this paper, I follow up on their work to resolve the question of caste number in within-nest honey bees. To determine whether nurses (typically aged 4–12 days) and middle-aged bees (aged 12–20 days) have distinct task repertoires, I conducted focal animal observations on a large number of workers in both age groups working within the same nests at the same time. The results support their being two castes of within-nest bees. Young bees specialized on brood care tasks, while middle-aged bees specialized on nectar processing and nest maintenance. Middle-aged bees were observed caring for brood in less than 1% of the observations. Moreover, both castes exhibited movement patterns that correspond to the traditional view that nurses stay within the broodnest, while middle-aged bees move around a great deal in search of work throughout the nest. A review of studies conducted since the debate of Seeley and Kolmes supports the reliability of these results. This work has relevance for proximate models of temporal polyethism, as it is often assumed by such models that there is only one within-nest caste in the honeybee.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amdam GV, Omholt SW (2003) The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. J Theor Biol 223:451–464
Amdam GV, Page RP (2005) Intergenerational transfers may have decoupled physiological and chronological age in a eusocial insect. Ageing Res Rev 4:398–408
Amdam GV, Norberg K, Fondrk MK, Page RE (2004) Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11350–11355
Beshers SN, Huang ZY, Oono Y, Robinson GE (2001) Social inhibition and the regulation of temporal polyethism in honey bees. J Theor Biol 213:461–479
Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Calderone NW, Johnson BR (2002) The within-nest behaviour of honeybee pollen foragers in colonies with a high or low need for pollen. Anim Behav 63:749–758
Calderone NW, Page RE (1991) Evolutionary genetics of division of labor in colonies of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Am Nat 138:69–92
Calderone NW, Page RE (1996) Temporal polyethism and behavioural canalization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 51:631–643
Crailsheim K, Hrassnigg N, Stabentheiner A (1996) Diurnal behavioural differences in forager and nurse honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica Pollm). Apidologie 27:235–244
Free JB (1965) The allocation of duties among worker honeybees. Symp Zool Soc Lond 14:39–59
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin
Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1996) Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:147–158
Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1999) Social control of division of labor in honey bee colonies. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhauser Press, Basel, pp 165–186
Jeanne RL, Nordheim EV (1996) Productivity in a social wasp: per capita output increases with swarm size. Behav Ecol 7:43–48
Johnson BR (2002) Reallocation of labor in honeybee colonies during heat stress: the relative roles of task switching and the activation of reserve labor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:188–196
Johnson BR (2003) Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:147–152
Johnson BR (2005) Limited flexibility in the temporal caste system of the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:219–226
Kolmes SA (1985) A quantitative study of the division of labor among worker honey bees. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie-J Comp Ethol 68:287–302
Kolmes SA (1986) Age polyethism in worker honey bees. Ethology 71:252–255
Lindauer M (1967) Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
O’Donnell S (1998) Dominance and polyethism in the eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus mastigophorus (Hymenoptera : Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:327–331
Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Page RE, Amdam GV (2007) The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design. Bioessays 29:334–343
Page RE, Robinson GE (1991) The genetics of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Adv Insect Physiol 23:117–169
Pfeiffer KJ, Crailsheim K (1999) The behaviour of drifted nurse honey bees. Insectes Soc 46:34–40
Pratt SC (1998) Condition-dependent timing of comb construction by honeybee colonies: how do workers know when to start building? Anim Behav 56:603–610
Ribbands R (1953) The behavior and social life of honeybees. London Dover Pub. Inc, New York
Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665
Robinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. Am Nat 160:S160–S172
Rösch GA (1930) Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat, II. Z Vergl Physiol 12:1–71
Rutz W, Luscher M (1974) The occurrence of vitellogenin in workers and queens of Apis mellifica and the possibility of its transmission to the queen. J Insect Physiol 20:897–909
Rutz W, Gerig L, Wille H, Luscher M (1976) The function of juvenile hormone in adult worker honeybees, Apis mellifera. J Insect Physiol 22:1485–1491
Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293
Seeley TD (1985) Honey bee ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD (1986) Division of labor among worker honey bees. Ethology 71:249–251
Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony’s nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181–199
Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Seeley TD, Kolmes SA (1991) Age polyethism for hive duties in honey bees—illusion or reality? Ethology 87:284–297
Seid MA, Traniello JFA (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:631–644
Toth AL, Robinson GE (2005) Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees. Anim Behav 69:427–435
Tripet F, Nonacs P (2004) Foraging for work and age-based polyethism: the roles of age and previous experience on task choice in ants. Ethology 110:863–877
Weidenmuller A, Tautz J (2002) In-hive behavior of pollen foragers (Apis mellifera) in honey bee colonies under conditions of high and low pollen need. Ethology 108:205–221
West-Eberhard MJ (1996) Wasp societies as microcosms for the study of development and evolution. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 290–317
Whitfield CW, Ben-Shahar Y, Brillet C, Leoncini I, Crauser D, LeConte Y, Rodriguez-Zas S, Robinson GE (2006) Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16068–16075
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. The Belknap Press, Cambridge
Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:141–154
Wilson EO (1987) The causes of ecological success: the case of the ants—the 6th Tansley Lecture. J Anim Ecol 56:1–9
Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:65–68
Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (2005) The rise of the ants: a phylogenetic and ecological explanation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:7411–7414
Winston M (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
I thank Rob Page and Kim Fondrk for providing the lab space and resources for the experiment. Nigel Franks, Ana Sendova-Franks, Tom Richardson, and two anonymous referees provided comments and discussion on the manuscript. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation Minority Postdoctoral Fellowship. The experiments reported here comply with the current laws of the United States of America.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, B.R. Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 777–784 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0503-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0503-2