Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The ideal timing for nail dynamization in femoral shaft delayed union and non-union

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Nail dynamization is one of the proposed surgical options to manage femoral shaft non-union. This study aims to assess the efficacy and the ideal timing for dynamization in patients with femoral shaft delayed union or non-union.

Material and methods

Sixty-eight patients (38 male and 30 female, mean age 36.85 years old, range 22–58) were recruited. The patients were divided into three groups according to the fracture healing time: groupa A, fracture healing occurred within nine months; group B, fracture healing occurred between nine and 12 months; and group C, fracture healing after 12 months or secondary procedure needed for union. Callus-to-diaphysis ratio was calculated on femur X-rays at the time of dynamization.

Results

In 30 patients out of 68, the fracture healing was observed at nine month follow-up; in 26 patients, the fracture healed within 12 months; eight fractures healed in more than 12 months and only four fractures required a secondary procedure for union. Dynamization was successful in 64 patients out of 68 (94.12%). The mean callus-diaphysis ratio was significantly different in group A (p = 0.001) and in group B (p = 0.03), compared with group C. The timing of dynamization resulted significantly different between the three groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that nail dynamization should be performed between three and six months after trauma. The optimal callus-to-diaphysis ratio should be comprised between 1.47 and 1.19, at the time of dynamization.

Discussion

Nail dynamization revealed safe and effective in the treatment of femoral delayed union and non-union. It should be considered as a first-line treatment for femoral non-union or delayed union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arneson TJ, Melton LJ, Lewallen DG, O’Fallon WM (1988) Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res:188–194

  2. Salminen ST, Pihlajamäki HK, Avikainen VJ, Böstman OM (2000) Population based epidemiologic and morphologic study of femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res:241–249

  3. Vermesan D, Prejbeanu R, Haragus H et al (2017) Case series of patients with pathological dyaphiseal fractures from metastatic bone disease. Int Orthop 41:2199–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3582-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee JR, Kim H-J, Lee K-B (2016) Effects of third fragment size and displacement on non-union of femoral shaft fractures after locking for intramedullary nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pihlajamäki HK, Salminen ST, Böstman OM (2002) The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 16:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen W, Jing Y, Lv H et al (2016) Displaced femoral shaft fractures treated by antegrade nailing with the assistance of an intramedullary reduction device. Int Orthop 40:1735–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3036-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Somford MP, van den Bekerom MPJ, Kloen P (2013) Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 8:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lynch JR, Taitsman LA, Barei DP, Nork SE (2008) Femoral nonunion: risk factors and treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:88–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R (2018) Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3864-4

  10. Vaughn J, Gotha H, Cohen E et al (2016) Nail dynamization for delayed union and nonunion in femur and tibia fractures. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160819-01

  11. Gelalis ID, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM et al (2012) Diagnostic and treatment modalities in nonunions of the femoral shaft. A review. Injury 43:980–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang K-C, Tong K-M, Lin Y-M et al (2012) Evaluation of methods and timing in nail dynamisation for treating delayed healing femoral shaft fractures. Injury 43:1747–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tigani D, Fravisini M, Stagni C et al (2005) Interlocking nail for femoral shaft fractures: is dynamization always necessary? Int Orthop 29:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0627-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu CC (1997) The effect of dynamization on slowing the healing of femur shaft fractures after interlocking nailing. J Trauma 43:263–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu CC, Shih CH (1993) Effect of dynamization of a static interlocking nail on fracture healing. Can J Surg 36:302–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu C-C, Chen W-J (1997) Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing: poor results of dynamization. Acta Orthop Scand 68:537–540. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679708999022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Parker B (1984) Comminuted femoral-shaft fractures: treatment by roller traction, cerclage wires and an intramedullary nail, or an interlocking intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1222–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akram Saji MA, Rabari YB, Kumar Gupta R et al (2017) Comparative study of static versus dynamic intramedullary nailing of tibia. Int J Orthop Sci 3:283–286. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i3e.52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yokota H, Tanaka SM (2005) Osteogenic potentials with joint-loading modality. J Bone Miner Metab 23:302–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-005-0603-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vécsei V, Häupl J (1989) The value of dynamic adjustment in locking intramedullary nailing. Aktuelle Traumatol 19:162–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M et al (2018) Diaphyseal long bone nonunions — types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 42:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3734-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Orthopaedic & Trauma Unit, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Giovanni Vicenti, Davide Bizzoca, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Vittorio Nappi, Francesco Rifino, Giuseppe Solarino & Biagio Moretti

Authors
  1. Giovanni Vicenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Davide Bizzoca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Massimiliano Carrozzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vittorio Nappi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Francesco Rifino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giuseppe Solarino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Biagio Moretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Carrozzo.

Ethics declarations

This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vicenti, G., Bizzoca, D., Carrozzo, M. et al. The ideal timing for nail dynamization in femoral shaft delayed union and non-union. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 217–222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4129-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4129-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation