Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Case series of patients with pathological dyaphiseal fractures from metastatic bone disease

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fractures on pathologic bone have major impact on life quality. The appropriate treatment is not standardized, but the current literature delineates that surgery must provide adequate stabilization for the life expectancy. We aimed to review the epidemiology, treatment outcomes and survival in our department.

Material and methods

The electronic database from a major referral centre was searched for patients treated for tumours and fractures by the corresponding ICM-10 codes over five years. Eighty-nine patients were identified. Eleven females and nine males, with an average age of 64 years underwent 23 operations during the selected timeframe. Six fractures were subtrochanteric, five at the femoral neck and five at the femoral diaphysis. Seventeen cases were metastatic carcinomas, out of which five mammary, three pulmonary and seven carcinomas of undetermined origin without immunohistochemistry.

Results

Fourteen types of surgical intervention were osteosynthesis with intramedullary nails and six were partial hip replacements of which one had proximal femur resection and revision stem hemiarthroplasty. Four patients had single metastatic lesions which underwent resection and defect filling using PMMA cement (polymethylmethacrylate). The follow-up period ranged between two and seven years or until death. Only five patients (25%) were alive at the last follow-up. Local recurrence appeared in one patient. There was one immediate post-operative complication (dehiscent wound) and one implant failure after five years and was replaced with a larger diameter (exchange nailing).

Conclusion

Both hip arthroplasty and femoral nailing are safe and routine procedures that are performed with relatively technical ease and low surgical stress and few peri-operative complications for the patient. They allow for immediate mobilization and weight-bearing with moderate and rapidly decreasing pain and discomfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulman KL, Kohles J (2007) Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the US. Cancer 109(11):2334–2342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sarahrudi K, Hora K, Heinz T et al (2006) Treatment results of pathological fractures of the long bones: a retrospective analysis of 88 patients. Int Orthod (SICOT) 30:519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Talbot M, Turcotte RE, Isler M, Normandin D, Iannuzzi D, Downer P (2005) Function and health status in surgically treated bone metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wedin R, Bauer HC (2005) Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstructionnail? J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(12):1653–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steensma M, Boland PJ, Morris CD, Athanasian E, Healey JH (2011) Endoprosthetic treatment is more durable for pathologic proximal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):920–926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward WG, Holsenbeck S, Dorey FJ, Spang J, Howe D (2003) Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415(Suppl):S230–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prejbeanu R, Patrascu JM, Poenaru DV, Vermesan D, Popa I, Haragus H (2014) Cement filling of contained defects from bone tumor resections. Key Eng Mater 614:168–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber KL (2010) Evaluation of the adult patient (aged >40 years) with a destructive bone lesion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(3):169–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrascu JM, Vermesan D, Mioc ML, Lazureanu V, Florescu S, Tarullo A, Tatullo M, Abbinante A, Caprio M, Cagiano R, Haragus H (2014) Musculo-skeletal tumors incidence and surgical treatment—a single center 5-year retrospective. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(24):3898–3901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swanson KC, Pritchard DJ, Sim FH (2000) Surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the femur. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8(1):56–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soldatos T, Chalian M, Attar S, McCarthy EF, Carrino JA, Fayad LM (2013) Imaging differentiation of pathologic fractures caused by primary and secondary bone tumors. Eur J Radiol 82(1):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamada K, Naka N, Tamiya H et al (2009) Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for impending pathological fractures in patients with femoral diaphyseal bone metastases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 19:547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deschamps F, Farouil G, Hakime A, Barah A, Guiu B, Teriitehau C, Auperin A, deBaere T (2012) Cementoplasty of metastases of the proximal femur: is it a safe palliative option? J Vasc Interv Radiol 23(10):1311–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poenaru DV, Prejbeanu R, Iulian P, Haragus H, Popovici E, Golet I, Vermesan D (2014) Epidemiology of osteoporotic hip fractures in western Romania. Int Orthop 38(11):2329–2334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scolaro JA, Lackman RD (2014) Surgical management of metastatic long bone fractures: principles and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 22(2):90–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zacherl M, Gruber G, Glehr M et al (2011) Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures. Int Orthod (SICOT) 35:1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vermesan D, Prejbeanu R, Haragus H, Poenaru DV, Mioc ML, Tatullo M, Abbinante A, Scacco S, Tarullo A, Inchingolo F, Caprio M, Cagiano R (2014) Clinical relevance of altered bone immunopathology pathways around the elbow. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(19):2846–2850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Vermesan D, Haragus H, Icma I, Predescu V (2014) Acute abdominal complications following hip surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 109(2):218–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Poenaru D, Vermeșan D, Hărăguș H (2014) Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary locked nailing in tibial fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014 24(8):1597–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan V. Poenaru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vermesan, D., Prejbeanu, R., Haragus, H. et al. Case series of patients with pathological dyaphiseal fractures from metastatic bone disease. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 2199–2203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3582-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3582-3

Keywords

Navigation