Skip to main content
Log in

Interlocking nail for femoral shaft fractures: is dynamization always necessary?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of 179 closed femoral fractures treated by static interlocking nailing (Grosse-Kempf nail) was reviewed to evaluate the effect of dynamization on the time to bony union. In 75 patients, dynamization was performed whereas in 104 the implant was left static. Union occurred in 178 patients. We observed one infection. Time to union was significantly shorter in the static group (103 days) compared to the dynamized group (126 days).

Résumé

Une série de 179 fractures fémorales fermées traitées par enclouage verrouillé centro-médullaire statique (clou de Grosse-Kempf) a été examinée pour évaluer l’effet de la dynamisation sur le temps de consolidation osseuse. Chez 75 malades la dynamisation a été exécuté, alors que pour 104 l’implant était laissé statique. La consolidation s’est effectuée chez 178 malades. Nous avons observé une infection. Le temps de consolidation était significativement plus court dans le groupe statique (103 jours) comparé au groupe dynamisé (126 jours).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basumallick MN, Bandopadhyay A (2002) Effect of dynamization in open interlocking nailing of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized comparative study of 50 cases with a 2-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg 68:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brumback RJ (1988) Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part II: Fracture-healing with static interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1453–1462

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brumback RJ (1996) The rationales of interlocking nailing of the femur, tibia and humerus. An overview. Clin Ortop 324:292–320

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dagrenat D, Moncade N, Cordey J, Rahn BA, Kempf I, Perren SM (1988) Effects of the dynamization of static bolt nailing. In vivo experimentation. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot (Suppl) 2:100–104

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gustillo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G (1985) Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:709–720

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kempf I, Grosse A, Laffourge D (1978) L’apport du verrouillage dans l’enclouage centromédullaire des os longs. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 64:635–651

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muller M, Nazarian S, Koch P (1978) Classification AO des Fracturens. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tigani D, Giunti A, Boriani S (1986) Ostesintesi con chiodo di endomidollare avvitato: difficoltà, limiti, prospettive. Chir Organi Mov 71:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tigani D, Moscato M, Sabetta E, Padovani G, Boriani S (1989) Breakage of the Grosse-Kempf nail: causes and remedies. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 15:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winquist RA, Hansen ST (1980) Comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft treated by intramedullary nailing. Orthop Clin North Am 11:633–640

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu CC (1997) The effect of dynamization on slowing the healing of femur shaft fractures after interlocking nailing. J Trauma 43:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CC, Chen W (1997) Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing. Acta Orthop Scand 68:541–544

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Tigani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tigani, D., Fravisini, M., Stagni, C. et al. Interlocking nail for femoral shaft fractures: is dynamization always necessary?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 101–104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0627-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0627-1

Keywords

Navigation