Skip to main content
Log in

Productivity of Spirulina in a strongly curved outdoor tubular photobioreactor

  • Original Paper
  • Biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of different flow rates (from 0.18 m/s to 0.97 m/s) on the productivity of Spirulina grown outdoors in a strongly curved tubular photo-bioreactor (CTP) was studied. The results were compared to those obtained with a conventional photobioreactor made with straight tubes to form a loop (STP). The cultures were operated at a biomass concentration of 10 g/l dry weight. The productivity of the culture increased by about 39% and 29% in the CTP and STP respectively when the flow rate of the culture was increased from 0.18 m/s to 0.75 m/s. A further increase of the flow rate did not result in any increase of the productivity in either of the photo-bioreactors. The better performance of the culture observed in the CTP was attributed to an intermittent illumination pattern resulting from a secondary flow motion generated in the bends. The power required for the induction of the same flow rate inside the two types of photobioreactor changed significantly. At a Reynolds number of 4000, the power absorbed by the CTP was 25% higher than that required for water recycling in the STP and rose by more than 40% at a Reynolds number of 20000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin LR, Seader JD (1973) Fully developed viscous flow in coiled circular pipes. AIChE J 19: 85–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eustice J (1910) Flow of water in curved pipes. Proc R Soc Lond [A] 84: 107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson AG, Tsuchiya HM (1970) Utilization of the effects of intermittent illumination on photosynthetic microorganisms. In: Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity, Wageningen Centre Agriculture Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen pp 519–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU (1994) Turbulence in mass algal cultures and the role of light/dark fluctuations. J Appl Phycol 6: 331–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudin C, Chaumont D (1991) Cell fragility — the key problem of microalgae mass production in a closed photobioreactor. Bioresource Technol 38: 145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino K, Hamochi M, Mitsuhashi S, Tanishita K (1991) Measurements of oxygen production rate in flowing Spirulina suspension. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 35: 89–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isachenko VP, Osipova VA, Sukomel AS (1977) Heat transfer. (English translation). Mir, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok B (1953) Experiments on photosynthesis by Chlorella in flashing light. In: Burlew JS (ed) Algal culture from laboratory to pilot plant. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, pp. 63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws EA, Satoru T, Hirata J, Pang L (1987) Optimization of microalgae production in a shallow outdoor flume. Biotechnol Bioeng 32: 140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori Y, Nakayama W (1965) Study on forced convective heat transfer in curved pipes (1st report, laminar region). Int J Heat Mass Transfer 8: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JN, Myers J (1954) Growth rate of Chlorella in flashing light. Plant Physiol 29: 152–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirt SJ, Lee YK, Walach MR, Watts Pirt M, Balyuzi HHM, Bazin MJ (1983) A tubular bioreactor for photosynthetic production of biomass from carbon dioxide: design and performance. J Chem Biotechnol 33: 35–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell CK, Chaddock JB, Dixon JR (1965) The motion of algae in turbulent flow. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 7: 295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitch EI (1956) Photosynthesis, vol 2, part 2. Interscience, New York, pp 1433–1484

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A (1990) Large scale microalgal culture and applications. In: Round FE, Chapman DJ (eds) Progress in phycological research, vol 7. Biopress, Bristol, pp 269–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A, Vonshak A (1978) Spirulina culture in Israel. Arch Hydrobiol 11: 274–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GI (1929) The criterion for turbulence in curved pipes. Proc R Soc Lond [A] 124: 243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanishita K, Suzuki J, Ohishi N, Naruse T (1990) Fluid flow in a strongly curved pipe. Front Med Biol Eng 2: 187–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terry K (1985) Photosynthesis in modulated light: quantitative dependence of photosynthetic enhancement on flashing rate. Biotechnol Bioeng 28: 988–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Sacchi A., Materassi R, Richmond A (1991) Effect of temperature on yield and night biomass loss in Spirulina platensis grown outdoors in tubular photobioreactors. J Appl Phycol 3: 103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Carlozzi P, Pushparaj B, Montaini E, Materassi R (1993) A two-plane tubular photobioreactor for outdoor culture of Spirulina. Biotechnol Bioeng 42: 891–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vonshak A, Abeliovich A, Boussiba S, Richmond A (1982) Production of Spirulina biomass: effects of environmental factors and population density. Biomass, 2: 175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarrouk C (1966) Contribution à l’étude d’une cyanophycée. Influence de divers facteurs physiques et chimiques sur la croissance et la photosynthèse de Spirulina maxima. Ph. D. Thèse Université de Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlozzi, P., Torzillo, G. Productivity of Spirulina in a strongly curved outdoor tubular photobioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 45, 18–23 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050642

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050642

Keywords

Navigation