Abstract
Isobutanol is attracting attention as a potential biofuel because it has higher energy density and lower hygroscopicity than ethanol. To date, several effective methods for microbial production of isobutanol have been developed, but they require expensive reagents to maintain expression plasmids and induce expression, which is not suitable for practical production. Here, we describe a simple and efficient method for isobutanol production in Escherichia coli. It is noteworthy that no expression plasmids or inducers were used during the production. Instead, heterologous genes necessary for isobutanol production were all knocked into the genome, and the expression of those genes was induced by xylose, which is present in most biomass feedstocks. The constructed strain (mlcXT7-LAFC-AAKCD) contains Bacillus subtilis alsS, E. coli ilvCD, Lactococcus lactis adhA, and L. lactis kivd genes in its genome and efficiently produced isobutanol from glucose and xylose in flask batch cultures. Under conditions in which the temperature and pH of the medium and the aeration in the culture were all optimized, the final isobutanol concentration reached 8.4 g L−1 after 48 h. Isobutanol was also produced using hydrolysate from Japanese cedar as the carbon source without supplemented glucose, xylose, or yeast extract. Under those conditions, isobutanol (3.7 g L−1) was produced in 96 h. Taken together, these results indicate that the developed strain is potentially useful for industrial isobutanol production.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abanoz K, Stark BC, Akbas MY (2012) Enhancement of ethanol production from potato-processing wastewater by engineering Escherichia coli using Vitreoscilla haemoglobin. Lett Appl Microbiol 55:436–443
Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC (2008) Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451:86–89
Atsumi S, Higashide W, Liao JC (2009) Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nat Biotechnol 27:1177–1180
Baez A, Cho KM, Liao JC (2011) High-flux isobutanol production using engineered Escherichia coli: a bioreactor study with in situ product removal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1681–1690
Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2002) The metabolism of glucose 6-phosphate by the pentose phosphate pathway is coordinated with glycolysis. In: Biochemistry, 5th edn. W.H. Freeman & Co Ltd, New York
Blombach B, Riester T, Wieschalka S, Ziert C, Youn JW, Wendisch VF, Eikmanns BJ (2011) Corynebacterium glutamicum tailored for efficient isobutanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3300–3310
Blomfield IC, Vaughn V, Rest RF, Eisenstein BI (1991) Allelic exchange in Escherichia coli using the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene and a temperature-sensitive pSC101 replicon. Mol Microbiol 5:1447–1457
Cao Y, Liu W, Xu X, Zhang H, Wang J, Xian M (2014) Production of free monounsaturated fatty acids by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:59
de Groot NS, Ventura S (2006) Effect of temperature on protein quality in bacterial inclusion bodies. FEBS Lett 580:6471–6476
de la Plaza M, Fernández de Palencia P, Peláez C, Requena T (2004) Biochemical and molecular characterization of alpha-ketoisovalerate decarboxylase, an enzyme involved in the formation of aldehydes from amino acids by Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 238:367–374
Deuschle U, Kammerer W, Gentz R, Bujard H (1986) Promoters of Escherichia coli: a hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures. EMBO J 5:2987–2994
Di Donato A, de Nigris M, Russo N, Di Biase S, D’Alessio G (1993) A method for synthesizing genes and cDNAs by the polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 212:291–293
Diederich L, Rasmussen LJ, Messer W (1992) New cloning vectors for integration in the lambda attachment site attB of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Plasmid 28:14–24
Emmerson JR, Gally DL, Roe AJ (2006) Generation of gene deletions and gene replacements in Escherichia coli O157:H7 using a temperature sensitive allelic exchange system. Biol Proced Online 8:153–162
Goshima T, Tsuji M, Inoue H, Yano S, Hoshino T, Matsushika A (2013) Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by a novel Kluyveromyces marxianus strain. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:1505–1510
Hahn HD, Dämbkes G, Rupprich N Bahl H, Frey GD (2013) Butanols. In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry Wiley, New York, 1–13
Higashide W, Li Y, Yang Y, Liao JC (2011) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium cellulolyticum for production of isobutanol from cellulose. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2727–2733
Hunke S, Betton JM (2003) Temperature effect on inclusion body formation and stress response in the periplasm of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 50:1579–1589
Huo YX, Cho KM, Rivera JG, Monte E, Shen CR, Yan Y, Liao JC (2011) Conversion of proteins into biofuels by engineering nitrogen flux. Nat Biotechnol 29:346–351
Jia X, Li S, Xie S, Wen J (2012) Engineering a metabolic pathway for isobutanol biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168:1–9
Kanno M, Katayama T, Tamaki H, Mitani Y, Meng XY, Hori T, Narihiro T, Morita N, Hoshino T, Yumoto I, Kimura N, Hanada S, Kamagata Y (2013) Isolation of butanol- and isobutanol-tolerant bacteria and physiological characterization of their butanol tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6998–7005
Karabektas M, Hosoz M (2009) Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine using isobutanol—diesel fuel blends. Renew Energy 34:1554–1559
Kondo T, Tezuka H, Ishii J, Matsuda F, Ogino C, Kondo A (2012) Genetic engineering to enhance the Ehrlich pathway and alter carbon flux for increased isobutanol production from glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 159:32–37
Lang K, Zierow J, Buehler K, Schmid A (2014) Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas sp. strain VLB120 as platform biocatalyst for the production of isobutyric acid and other secondary metabolites. Microb Cell Factories 13:2
Lee SJ, Oh EK, Oh YH, Won JI, Han SK, Lee JW (2010a) Increased ethanol resistance in Ethanolic Escherichia coli by Insertion of heat-shock genes BEM1 and SOD2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 15:770–776
Lee SH, Chang F, Inoue S, Endo T (2010b) Increase in enzyme accessibility by generation of nanospace in cell wall supramolecular structure. Bioresour Technol 101:7218–7223
Lee WH, Kim MD, Jin YS, Seo JH (2013) Engineering of NADPH regenerators in Escherichia coli for enhanced biotransformation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:2761–2772
Li S, Wen J, Jia X (2011) Engineering Bacillus subtilis for isobutanol production by heterologous Ehrlich pathway construction and the biosynthetic 2-ketoisovalerate precursor pathway overexpression. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:577–589
Li H, Opgenorth PH, Wernick DG, Rogers S, Wu TY, Higashide W, Malati P, Huo YX, Cho KM, Liao JC (2012) Integrated electromicrobial conversion of CO2 to higher alcohols. Science 335:1596
Li Y, Xu T, Tschaplinski TJ, Engle NL, Yang Y, Graham DE, He Z, Zhou J (2014) Improvement of cellulose catabolism in Clostridium cellulolyticum by sporulation abolishment and carbon alleviation. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:25
Martínez I, Zhu J, Lin H, Bennett GN, San KY (2008) Replacing Escherichia coli NAD-dependent glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) with a NADP-dependent enzyme from Clostridium acetobutylicum facilitates NADPH dependent pathways. Metab Eng 10:352–359
Matsuda F, Kondo T, Ida K, Tezuka H, Ishii J, Kondo A (2012) Construction of an artificial pathway for isobutanol biosynthesis in the cytosol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 76:2139–2141
Mills TY, Sandoval NR, Gill RT (2009) Cellulosic hydrolysate toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Biofuels 2:26
Nakashima N, Miyazaki K (2014) Bacterial cellular engineering by genome editing and gene silencing. Int J Mol Sci 15:2773–2793
Nakashima N, Tamura T (2012) A new carbon catabolite repression mutation of Escherichia coli, mlc∗, and its use for producing isobutanol. J Biosci Bioeng 114:38–44
Nakashima N, Tamura T (2013) Gene silencing in Escherichia coli using antisense RNAs expressed from doxycycline-inducible vectors. Lett Appl Microbiol 56:436–442
Nakashima N, Akita H, Hoshino T (2014) Establishment of a novel gene expression method, BICES (biomass-inducible chromosome-based expression system), and its application for production of 2,3-butanediol and acetoin. Metab Eng 25:204–214
Peng L, Shimizu K (2003) Global metabolic regulation analysis for Escherichia coli K12 based on protein expression by 2-dimensional electrophoresis and enzyme activity measurement. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:163–178
Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Oliveira R (2006) Low-cost fermentative medium for biosurfactant production by probiotic bacteria. Biochem Eng J 32:135–142
Saha BC (2006) A low-cost medium for mannitol production by Lactobacillus intermedius NRRL B-3693. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:676–680
Thapa LP, Lee SJ, Yoo HY, Choi HS, Park C, Kim SW (2013) Development of glycerol-utilizing Escherichia coli strain for the production of bioethanol. Enzym Microb Technol 53:206–215
Wang BW, Shi AQ, Tu R, Zhang XL, Wang QH, Bai FW (2012) Branched-chain higher alcohols. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 128:101–118
Zinoviev S, Müller-Langer F, Das P, Bertero N, Fornasiero P, Kaltschmitt M, Centi G, Miertus S (2010) Next-generation biofuels: survey of emerging technologies and sustainability issues. Chem Sus Chem 3:1106–1133
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all members of the Bio-conversion Research Team at our institute [Biomass Refinery Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Sciences and Technology (AIST)] for their technical assistance and valuable discussion. This work was supported in part by KAKENHI (23780096) and a grant from the Japan-US cooperation on Clean Energy Technologies, METI, Japan, to N. Nakashima.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akita, H., Nakashima, N. & Hoshino, T. Bacterial production of isobutanol without expensive reagents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99, 991–999 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6173-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6173-x