Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of light direction and suspended cell concentrations on algal biofilm growth rates

  • Biotechnological products and process engineering
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Algae biofilms were grown in a semicontinuous flat plate biofilm photobioreactor to study the effects of light direction and suspended algal cell populations on algal biofilm growth. It was determined that, under the growth conditions and biofilm thicknesses studied, light direction had no effect on long-term algal biofilm growth (26 days); however, light direction did affect the concentration of suspended algal cells by influencing the photon flux density in the growth medium in the photobioreactors. This suspended algal cell population affected short-term (7 days) algae cell recruitment and algal biofilm growth, but additional studies showed that enhanced suspended algal cell populations did not affect biofilm growth rates over the long term (26 days). Studying profiles of light transmittance through biofilms as they grew showed that most of the light became attenuated by the biomass after just a few days of growth (88 % after 3 days). The estimated biofilm thicknesses after these few days of growth were approximately 150 μm. The light attenuation data suggests that, although the biofilms grew to 700–900 μm, under these light intensities, only the first few hundred micrometers of the biofilm is receiving enough light to be photosynthetically active. We postulate that this photosynthetically active layer of the biofilm grows adjacent to the light source, while the rest of the biofilm is in a stationary growth phase. The results of this study have implications for algal biofilm photobioreactor design and operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avendano-Herrera RE, Riquelme CE (2007) Production of a diatom-bacteria biofilm photobioreactor for aquaculture applications. Aquacult Eng 36:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barranguet C, van Beusekom SAM, Veuger B, Neu TR, Manders EMM, Sinke JJ, Admiraal W (2004) Studying undisturbed autotrophic biofilms: still a technical challenge. Aquat Microb Ecol 34:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton AJ, Sagers RD, Pitt WG (1996) Measurement of bacterial growth rates on polymers. J Biom Mater Res 32:271–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartosh Y, Banks CJ (2007) Algal growth response and survival in a range of light and temperature conditions: implications for non-steady-state conditions in waste stabilisation ponds. Water Sci Technol 55(11):211–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bester E, Edwards E, Wolfaardt GM (2009) Planktonic cell yield is linked to biofilm development. Can J Microbiol 55:1195–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho AP, Silva SO, Baptista JM, Malcata FX (2011) Light requirements in microalgal photobioreactors: an overview of biophotonic aspects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:1275–1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Goh QY, Tan W, Hossain I, Chen WN, Lau R (2011) Lumostatic strategy for microalgae cultivation utilizing image analysis and chlorophyll a content as design parameters. Bioresour Technol 102:6005–6012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng P, Li B, Gao L, Zhang W, Wang J, Liu T (2013) The growth, lipid and hydrocarbon production of Botryococcus braunii with attached cultivation. Bioresour Technol 138:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson LB, Sims RC (2012) Rotating algal biofilm reactor and spool harvester for wastewater treatment with biofuels by-products. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(7):1674–1684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craggs RJ, Adey WH, Jenson KR, John MS, Green FB, Oswald WJ (1996) Phosphorus removal from wastewater using an algal turf scrubber. Water Sci Technol 33(7):191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dauta A, Devaux J, Piquemal F, Boumnich L (1990) Growth rate of four freshwater algae in relation to light and temperature. Hydrobiologia 207:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies DG (1999) Regulation of matrix polymer in biofilm formation and dispersion. In: Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming H-C (eds) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: characterization, structure and function. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Genin SN, Aitchison SJ, Allen DG (2014) Design of algal film photobioreactors: material surface energy effects on algal film productivity, colonization and lipid content. Bioresour Technol 155:136–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgianna DR, Mayfield SP (2012) Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature 488:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irving TE, Allen DG (2011) Species and material considerations in the formation and development of microalgal biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:283–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi A, Steinweg C, Sastre RR, Clemons P (2012) Advanced photobioreactor LED illumination system: scale-down approach to study microalgal growth kinetics. Eng Life Sci 12(6):621–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J, Revsbech NP (1989) Photosynthesis and respiration of a diatom biofilm cultured in a new gradient growth chamber. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Tuchman NC (1997) Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. J N Am Benlhol Soc 16(3):503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MB, Wen Z (2010) Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:525–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen BB, Cohen Y, Des Marais DJ (1987) Photosynthetic action spectra and adaptation to spectral light distribution in a benthic cyanobacterial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol 53(40):879–886

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kebede-Westhead E, Pizarro C, Mulbry WW (2003) Production and nutrient removal by periphyton grown under different loading rates of anaerobically digested flushed diary manure. J Phycol 39:1275–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl M, Glud RN, Ploug H, Ramsing NB (1996) Microenvironmental control of photosynthesis and photosynthesis-coupled respiration in an epilithic cyanobacterial biofilm. J Phycol 32:799–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan A, Berberoglu H (2013) Cell to substratum and cell to cell interactions of microalgae. Colloids Surf B 112:302–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan A, Kinney K, Katz L, Berberoglu H (2012) Reduction of water and energy requirement of algae cultivation using an algae biofilm photobioreactor. Bioresour Technol 114:542–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodolfi L, Zittelli GC, Bassi N, Padovani G, Biondi N, Bonini G, Tredici MR (2009) Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:100–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu HJ, Oh KK, Kim YS (2009) Optimization of the influential factors for the improvement of CO2 utilization efficiency and CO2 mass transfer rate. J Ind Eng Chem 15:471–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr PS, Espie GS, Allen DG (2013) Algae biofilm growth and the potential to stimulate lipid accumulation through nutrient starvation. Bioresour Technol 136:337–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie AC, Mulbry WW (2002) Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. Bioresour Technol 84:81–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the financial support in the form of a Strategic Grant and a Canadian Graduate Scholarship (CGS D). Additional thanks to Pond Biofuels Inc. for supplying lighting technologies used in this experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Grant Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnurr, P.J., Espie, G.S. & Allen, D.G. The effect of light direction and suspended cell concentrations on algal biofilm growth rates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98, 8553–8562 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5964-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5964-4

Keywords

Navigation