Abstract
The strength of key interfacial contacts that stabilize protein–protein interactions have been studied by computer simulation. Experimentally, changes in the interface are evaluated by generating specific mutations at one or more points of the protein structure. Here, such an evaluation is performed by means of steered molecular dynamics and use of a dimeric model of tryptophan repressor and in-silico mutants as a test case. Analysis of four particular cases shows that, in principle, it is possible to distinguish between wild-type and mutant forms by examination of the total energy and force–extension profiles. In particular, detailed atomic level structural analysis indicates that specific mutations at the interface of the dimeric model (positions 19 and 39) alter interactions that appear in the wild-type form of tryptophan repressor, reducing the energy and force required to separate both subunits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alessandrini A, Facci P (2005) AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics. Meas Sci Technol 16:R65–R92
Balsera M, Stepaniants S, Izrailev S, Oono Y, Schulten K (1997) Reconstructing potential energy functions from simulated force-induced unbinding Processes. Biophys J 73:1281–1287
Bayas M, Schulten K, Leckband D (2004) Forced dissociation of the strand dimer interface between C-cadherin ectodomains. Mech Chem Biosyst 1:101–111
Best R, Paci E, Hummer G, Dudko O (2008) Pulling direction as a reaction coordinate for the mechanical unfolding of single. J Phys Chem B 112:5968–5976
Bogan AS, Thorn KS (1998) Anatomy of Hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1:1–9
Carra C, Saha J, Cucinotta FA (2012) Theoretical prediction of the binding free energy for mutants of replication protein A. J Mol Model 18:3035–3049
Deulfhard P, Hermans J, Leimkuhler B, Mark AE, Reich S, Skeel RD (eds) (1998) computational molecular dynamics: challenges, methods, ideas, vol 4. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin
Gao Y, Wang R, Lai L (2004) Structure-based method for analyzing protein–protein interfaces. J Mol Model 10:44–54
Gutierrez G, Menendez-Proupin E, Loyola C, Peralta J, Davis S (2010) Computer simulation study of amorphous compounds: structural and vibrational properties. J Mater Sci 45:5124–5134
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD—visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38
Kale L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R, Gursoy A, Krawetz N, Phillips J, Shinozaki A, Varadarajan K, Schulten K (1999) NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 151:283–312
Kamisetty H, Ramanathan A, Bailey-Kellogg C, Langmead CJ (2011) Accounting for conformational entropy in predicting binding free energies of protein–protein interactions. Proteins 79:444–462
Li H, Oberhauser A, Fowler S, Clarke J, Fernandez J (2000) Atomic force microscopy reveals the mechanical design of a modular protein. PNAS 97:6527–6531
Lu H, Schulten K (1999) Steered molecular dynamics simulations of force-induced protein domain unfolding. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 35:453–463
MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL Jr, Evanseck J, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher IWE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith J, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616
Mann C, Matthews CR (1993) Structure and stability of an early folding intermediate of Escherichia coli trp aporepressor measured by far-uv stopped-flow circular-dichroism and 8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonate binding. Biochem 32:5282–5290
Royer CA, Mann CJ, Matthews CR (1993) Resolution of the fluorescence equilibrium unfolding profile of trp aporepressor using single tryptophan mutants. Protein Sci 2:1844–1852
Rumfeldt JAO, Galvagnion C, Vassall KA, Meiering EM (2008) Conformational stability and folding mechanisms of dimeric proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 98:61–84
Shank E, Cecconi C, Dill J, Marqusee S, Bustamante C (2010) The folding cooperativity of a protein is controlled by its chain topology. Nature 465:637–640
Shao X, Hensley P, Matthews CR (1997) Construction and characterization of monomeric tryptophan repressor: a model for an early intermediate in the folding of a dimeric protein. Biochem 36:9941–9949
Shen M, Guan J, Xu L, Yu Y, He J, Jones GW, Song Y (2012) Steered molecular dynamics simulations on the binding of the appendant structure and helix-β2 in domain-swapped human cystation C dimer. J Biomol Struct Dyn 30:652–661
Voet D, Voet J (1995) Biochemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Zhang RG, Joachimiak A, Lawson CL, Schevitz RW, Otwinowski Z, Sigler PB (1987) The crystal structure of trp aporepressor at 1.8 Å shows how binding tryptophan enhances DNA affinity. Nature 327:591–597
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully thank Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnologíco, Fondecyt Grants no. 3110149 (GM), 11110534 (MB). GG acknowledges partial support of Fondecyt-Chile 1120603. This work have also been supported by the High-Performance Computing infrastructure of the Center for Mathematical Modeling, University of Chile, via the Project BASAL-CMM. The authors warmly thank Professors Boris Weiss-López and Bruce Kennedy Cassels for their useful insight and for critical reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miño, G., Baez, M. & Gutierrez, G. Effect of mutation at the interface of Trp-repressor dimeric protein: a steered molecular dynamics simulation. Eur Biophys J 42, 683–690 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-013-0918-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-013-0918-9