Abstract
Biomacromolecules, including proteins and their complexes, adopt multiple conformations that are linked to their biological functions. Though some of the structural heterogeneity can be studied by methods like X-ray crystallography, NMR, or cryo-electron microscopy, these methods fail to explain the detailed conformational transitions and dynamics. The dynamic structural states in proteins are covered in magnitude between 10−11 and 10−6 m and time-scales from 10−12 s to 10−5 s. For a comprehensive analysis of the biomolecular dynamics, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has evolved as the most powerful technique. With the advent of high-end computational power, MD simulations can be performed between μs to the ms time-scale that can accurately describe the dynamics of any system. Various force fields like GROMOS, AMBER, and CHARMM have been developed for MD simulations. Tools like GROMACS, AMBER, CHARMM-GUI, and NAMD are the most widely used methods for MD simulation that can provide precise information on the motions and flexibility of a protein, which contributes to the interaction dynamics of protein–ligand complexes. MD simulation has several other practical applications in diverse research areas, including molecular docking and drug design, refining protein structure predictions, and studying the unfolding pathway of a protein. Combining MD simulation with wet-lab experiments has become an indispensable complement in the investigation of several important and intricate biological processes. Various tools like principal component analysis, cross-correlation analysis, and residues interaction network analysis are additional useful approaches for analyzing MD data. In this chapter, we will discuss MD simulation for a layman understanding and explain how it can be used for protein–ligand characterization as well as for use in diverse biomolecular applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adcock SA, McCammon JA (2006) Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev 106(5):1589–1615
Alder BJ, Wainwright TE (1957) Phase transition for a hard sphere system. J Chem Phys 27(5):1208–1209
Alder BJ, Wainwright TE (1959) Studies in molecular dynamics. I. general method. J Chem Phys 31(2):459–466
Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M (2011) Metadynamics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 1(5):826–843
Berger A, Linderstrom-Lang K (1957) Deuterium exchange of poly-DL-alanine in aqueous solution. Arch Biochem Biophys 69:106–118
Boehr DD, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2006) An NMR perspective on enzyme dynamics. Chem Rev 106(8):3055–3079
Brooks B, Karplus M (1983) Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80(21):6571–6575
Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3rd, Mackerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30(10):1545–1614
Brunger AT, Brooks CL 3rd, Karplus M (1985) Active site dynamics of ribonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82(24):8458–8462
Brunger AT, Kuriyan J, Karplus M (1987) Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics. Science 235(4787):458–460
Case DA, Karplus M (1979) Dynamics of ligand binding to heme proteins. J Mol Biol 132(3):343–368
Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26(16):1668–1688
Colonna-Cesari F, Perahia D, Karplus M, Eklund H, Braden CI, Tapia O (1986) Interdomain motion in liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Structural and energetic analysis of the hinge bending mode. J Biol Chem 261(32):15273–15280
Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117(19):5179–5197
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an N-log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98(12):10089–10092
David CC, Jacobs DJ (2014) Principal component analysis: a method for determining the essential dynamics of proteins. Methods Mol Biol 1084:193–226
David ES, Martin MD, Ron OD, Jeffrey SK, Richard HL, John KS, Cliff Y, Brannon B, Kevin JB, Jack CC, Michael PE, Joseph G, Grossman JP, Ho CR, Douglas JI, John LK, Timothy L, Christine M, Mark AM, Rolf M, Edward CP, Yibing S, Jochen S, Michael T, Brian T, Stanley CW (2007) Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 34th annual international symposium on computer architecture, San Diego, California, USA
Dessailly BH, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ (2007) Relating destabilizing regions to known functional sites in proteins. BMC Bioinf 8:141
Doshi U, Hamelberg D (2015) Towards fast, rigorous and efficient conformational sampling of biomolecules: advances in accelerated molecular dynamics. Biochim Biophys Acta 1850(5):878–888
Dror RO, Dirks RM, Grossman JP, Xu H, Shaw DE (2012) Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu Rev Biophys 41:429–452
Duan Y, Kollman PA (1998) Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282(5389):740–744
Ewald PP (1921) Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann Phys 369(3):253–287
Falsafi-Zadeh S, Karimi Z, Galehdari H (2012) VMD DisRg: new user-friendly implement for calculation distance and radius of gyration in VMD program. Bioinformation 8(7):341–343
Feyfant E, Sali A, Fiser A (2007) Modeling mutations in protein structures. Protein Sci 16(9):2030–2041
Frauenfelder H, Hartmann H, Karplus M, Kuntz ID, Kuriyan J, Parak F, Petsko GA, Ringe D, Tilton RF (1987) Thermal expansion of a protein. Biochemistry 26(1):254–261
Froimowitz M (1993) HyperChem: a software package for computational chemistry and molecular modeling. BioTechniques 14(6):1010–1013
Fuzo CA, Degreve L (2014) Effect of the thermostat in the molecular dynamics simulation on the folding of the model protein chignolin. J Mol Model 18(6):2785–2794
Ge H, Wang Y, Li C, Chen N, Xie Y, Xu M, He Y, Gu X, Wu R, Gu Q, Zeng L, Xu J (2013) Molecular dynamics-based virtual screening: accelerating the drug discovery process by high-performance computing. J Chem Inf Model 53(10):2757–2764
Gotz AW, Williamson MJ, Xu D, Poole D, Le Grand S, Walker RC (2012) Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized born. J Chem Theory Comput 8(5):1542–1555
Groenhof G (2013) Introduction to QM/MM simulations. Methods Mol Biol 924:43–66
Gutowska I, Machoy Z, Machalinski B (2005) The role of bivalent metals in hydroxyapatite structures as revealed by molecular modeling with the HyperChem software. J Biomed Mater Res A 75(4):788–793
Harvey SC, Prabhakaran M, Mao B, McCammon JA (1984) Phenylalanine transfer RNA: molecular dynamics simulation. Science 223(4641):1189–1191
Heidari Z, Roe DR, Galindo-Murillo R, Ghasemi JB, Cheatham TE (2016) Using wavelet analysis to assist in identification of significant events in molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Inf Model 56(7):1282–1291
Hernandez-Rodriguez M, Rosales-Hernandez MC, Mendieta-Wejebe JE, Martinez-Archundia M, Basurto JC (2016) Current tools and methods in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for drug design. Curr Med Chem 23(34):3909–3924
Holden ZC, Richard RM, Herbert JM (2013) Periodic boundary conditions for QM/MM calculations: Ewald summation for extended Gaussian basis sets. J Chem Phys 139(24):244108
Hsin J, Arkhipov A, Yin Y, Stone JE, Schulten K (2008) Using VMD: an introductory tutorial. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 24:5–7
Huber T, Torda AE, van Gunsteren WF (1994) Local elevation: a method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8(6):695–708
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38, 27-38
Jeremy Smith SC, Pezzeca U, Brooks B, Karplus M (1986) Inelastic neutron scattering analysis of low frequency motion in proteins: a normal mode study of the bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J Chem Phys 85(6):3636–3654
Jones JE (1924) On the determination of molecular fields. -II from the equation of state of a gas. Proc Roy Soc A 106(738):463
Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J (2005) Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(19):6665–6670
Kalita J, Shukla R, Tripathi T (2018a) Structural basis of urea-induced unfolding of Fasciola gigantica glutathione S-transferase. J Cell Physiol 234(4):4491–4503
Kalita P, Shukla H, Shukla R, Tripathi T (2018b) Biochemical and thermodynamic comparison of the selenocysteine containing and non-containing thioredoxin glutathione reductase of Fasciola gigantica. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1862:1306–1316
Karplus M, Kuriyan J (2005) Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(19):6679–6685
Kastner J (2011) Umbrella sampling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 1(6):932–942
Khan FI, Wei DQ, Gu KR, Hassan MI, Tabrez S (2016) Current updates on computer aided protein modeling and designing. Int J Biol Macromol 85:48–62
Kini RM, Evans HJ (1991) Molecular modeling of proteins: a strategy for energy minimization by molecular mechanics in the AMBER force field. J Biomol Struct Dyn 9(3):475–488
Knapp B, Lederer N, Omasits U, Schreiner W (2010) vmdICE: a plug-in for rapid evaluation of molecular dynamics simulations using VMD. J Comput Chem 31(16):2868–2873
Krieger E, Vriend G (2015) New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 36(13):996–1007
Krishnamoorthy G (2012) Motional dynamics in proteins and nucleic acids control their function: revelation by time-domain fluorescence. Curr Sci 102(2):266–276
Kuzmanic A, Zagrovic B (2010) Determination of ensemble-average pairwise root mean-square deviation from experimental B-factors. Biophys J 98(5):861–871
Levitt M, Warshel A (1975) Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 253(5494):694–698
Likhachev IV, Balabaev NK, Galzitskaya OV (2016) Available instruments for analyzing molecular dynamics trajectories. Open Biochem J 10:1–11
MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FT, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102(18):3586–3616
Maisuradze GG, Liwo A, Scheraga HA (2009) Principal component analysis for protein folding dynamics. J Mol Biol 385(1):312–329
Malde AK, Zuo L, Breeze M, Stroet M, Poger D, Nair PC, Oostenbrink C, Mark AE (2011) An automated force field topology builder (ATB) and repository: version 1.0. J Chem Theory Comput 7(12):4026–4037
Mamgain S, Sharma P, Pathak RK, Baunthiyal M (2015) Computer aided screening of natural compounds targeting the E6 protein of HPV using molecular docking. Bioinformation 5:236–242
Mazola Y, Guirola O, Palomares S, Chinea G, Menendez C, Hernandez L, Musacchio A (2015) A comparative molecular dynamics study of thermophilic and mesophilic beta-fructosidase enzymes. J Mol Model 21(9):228
McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M (1977) Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 267(5612):585–590
McCammon JA, Karim OA, Lybrand TP, Wong CF (1986) Ionic association in water: from atoms to enzymes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 482:210–221
Nguyen TT, Viet MH, Li MS (2014) Effects of water models on binding affinity: evidence from all-atom simulation of binding of tamiflu to A/H5N1 neuraminidase. Sci World J 2014:536084
Nilsson L, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Brunger AT, Karplus M (1986) Structure refinement of oligonucleotides by molecular dynamics with nuclear overhauser effect interproton distance restraints: application to 5′ d(C-G-T-A-C-G)2. J Mol Biol 188(3):455–475
Norberto de Souza O, Ornstein RL (1999) Molecular dynamics simulations of a protein-protein dimer: particle-mesh Ewald electrostatic model yields far superior results to standard cutoff model. J Biomol Struct Dyn 16(6):1205–1218
Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25(13):1656–1676
Pandey T, Shukla R, Shukla H, Sonkar A, Tripathi T, Singh AK (2017) A combined biochemical and computational studies of the rho-class glutathione s-transferase sll1545 of Synechocystis PCC 6803. Int J Biol Macromol 94:378–385
Paquet E, Viktor HL (2015) Molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo simulations, and Langevin dynamics: a computational review. Biomed Res Int 2015:18
Perilla JR, Goh BC, Cassidy CK, Liu B, Bernardi RC, Rudack T, Yu H, Wu Z, Schulten K (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations of large macromolecular complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 31:64–74
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612
Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781–1802
Ponder JW, Case DA (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem 66:27–85
Prakash A, Kumar V, Meena NK, Hassan MI, Lynn AM (2018) Comparative analysis of thermal unfolding simulations of RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43). J Biomol Struct Dyn 37:178–194
Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, Hess B, Lindahl E (2013) GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29(7):845–854
Rahman A (1964) Correlations in the motion of atoms in liquid argon. Phys Rev 136(2A):A405–A411
Rahman A, Stillinger FH (1971) Molecular dynamics study of liquid water. J Chem Phys 55(7):3336–3359
Rajendran V, Shukla R, Shukla H, Tripathi T (2018) Structure-function studies of the asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase from Fasciola gigantica: understanding the role of catalytic and non-catalytic domains. Biochem J 475(21):3377–3391
Rodriguez-Bussey IG, Doshi U, Hamelberg D (2016) Enhanced molecular dynamics sampling of drug target conformations. Biopolymers 105(1):35–42
Sagui C, Darden TA (1999) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 28:155–179
Salomon-Ferrer R, Gotz AW, Poole D, Le Grand S, Walker RC (2013) Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh Ewald. J Chem Theory Comput 9(9):3878–3888
Salsbury FR Jr (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery. Curr Opin Pharmacol 10(6):738–744
Schuttelkopf AW, van Aalten DM (2004) PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60(Pt 8):1355–1363
Senn HM, Thiel W (2009) QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 48(7):1198–1229
Shukla H, Khan SR, Shukla R, Krishnan MY, Akhtar MS, Tripathi T (2018a) Alternate pathway to ascorbate induced inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 111:161–169
Shukla H, Shukla R, Sonkar A, Pandey T, Tripathi T (2018b) Distant Phe345 mutation compromises the stability and activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyase by modulating its structural flexibility. Sci Rep 7(1):1058
Shukla H, Shukla R, Sonkar A, Tripathi T (2018c) Alterations in conformational topology and interaction dynamics caused by L418A mutation leads to activity loss of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 490(2):276–282
Shukla R, Shukla H, Kalita P, Sonkar A, Pandey T, Singh DB, Kumar A, Tripathi T (2018d) Identification of potential inhibitors of Fasciola gigantica thioredoxin1: computational screening, molecular dynamics simulation, and binding free energy studies. J Biomol Struct Dyn 36(8):2147–2162
Shukla R, Shukla H, Sonkar A, Pandey T, Tripathi T (2018e) Structure-based screening and molecular dynamics simulations offer novel natural compounds as potential inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 36(8):2045–2057
Shukla R, Shukla H, Tripathi T (2018f) Activity loss by H46A mutation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyase is due to decrease in structural plasticity and collective motions of the active site. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 108:143–150
Singh DB, Tripathi T (2020) Frontiers in protein structure, function, and dynamics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5530-5. ISBN 978-981-15-5529-9
Sonkar A, Shukla H, Shukla R, Kalita J, Pandey T, Tripathi T (2017) UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) of Acinetobacter baumannii (AbMurA): structural and functional properties. Int J Biol Macromol 97:106–114
Sonkar A, Shukla H, Shukla R, Kalita J, Tripathi T (2018) Unfolding of Acinetobacter baumannii MurA proceeds through a metastable intermediate: a combined spectroscopic and computational investigation. Int J Biol Macromol 126:941–951
Syed SB, Shahbaaz M, Khan SH, Srivastava S, Islam A, Ahmad F, Hassan MI (2015) Estimation of pH effect on the structure and stability of kinase domain of human integrin-linked kinase. J Biomol Struct Dyn 37:156–165
Syed SB, Khan FI, Khan SH, Srivastava S, Hasan GM, Lobb KA, Islam A, Hassan MI, Ahmad F (2018) Unravelling the unfolding mechanism of human integrin linked kinase by GdmCl-induced denaturation. Int J Biol Macromol 117:1252–1263
Takahashi K, Narumi T, Yasuoka K (2010) Cutoff radius effect of the isotropic periodic sum method in homogeneous system. II. Water. J Chem Phys 133(1):014109
van Aalten DM, Bywater R, Findlay JB, Hendlich M, Hooft RW, Vriend G (1996) PRODRG, a program for generating molecular topologies and unique molecular descriptors from coordinates of small molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 10(3):255–262
Vogeli B, Kazemi S, Guntert P, Riek R (2012) Spatial elucidation of motion in proteins by ensemble-based structure calculation using exact NOEs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19(10):1053–1057
Voter AF (1997) Hyperdynamics: accelerated molecular dynamics of infrequent events. Phys Rev Lett 78(20):3908–3911
Warshel A, Levitt M (1976) Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol 103(2):227–249
Wolf A, Kirschner KN (2013) Principal component and clustering analysis on molecular dynamics data of the ribosomal L11.23S subdomain. J Mol Model 19(2):539–549
Wu X, Brooks BR (2009) Isotropic periodic sum of electrostatic interactions for polar systems. J Chem Phys 131(2):024107
Zhou Y, Liepe J, Sheng X, Stumpf MP, Barnes C (2012) GPU accelerated biochemical network simulation. Bioinformatics 27(6):874–876
Zoete V, Cuendet MA, Grosdidier A, Michielin O (2010) SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J Comput Chem 32(11):2359–2368
Competing Interest
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shukla, R., Tripathi, T. (2020). Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein and Protein–Ligand Complexes. In: Singh, D.B. (eds) Computer-Aided Drug Design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6815-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6815-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6814-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6815-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)