Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frankia and Alnus rubra Canopy Roots: An Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Propagule Availability, and Effects on Soil Nitrogen

  • Host Microbe Interactions
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ecological importance of microbial symbioses in terrestrial soils is widely recognized, but their role in soils that accumulate in forest canopies is almost entirely unknown. To address this gap, this study investigated the FrankiaAlnus rubra symbiosis in canopy and forest floor roots at Olympic National Park, WA, USA. Sixteen mature A. rubra trees were surveyed and Frankia genetic diversity in canopy and forest floor nodules was assessed with sequence-based nifH analyses. A seedling bioassay experiment was conducted to determine Frankia propagule availability in canopy and forest floor soils. Total soil nitrogen from both environments was also quantified. Nodules were present in the canopies of nine of the 16 trees sampled. Across the study area, Frankia canopy and forest floor assemblages were similar, with both habitats containing the same two genotypes. The composition of forest floor and canopy genotypes on the same tree was not always identical, however, suggesting that dispersal was not a strictly local phenomenon. Frankia seedling colonization was similar in canopy soils regardless of the presence of nodules as well as in forest floor soils, indicating that dispersal was not likely to be a major limiting factor. The total soil nitrogen of canopy soils was higher than that of forest floor soils, but the presence of Frankia nodules in canopy soils did not significantly alter soil nitrogen levels. Overall, this study indicates that the FrankiaA. rubra symbiosis is similar in canopy and forest floor environments. Because canopy roots are exposed to different environmental conditions within very small spatial areas and because those areas can be easily manipulated (e.g., fertilizer or watering treatments), they present microbial ecologists with a unique arena to examine root–microbe interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bamforth S (2007) Protozoa from aboveground and ground soils of tropical rain forest in Puerto Rico. Pedobiologia 50:515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson D, Dawson J (2007) Recent advances in the biogeography and genecology of symbiotic Frankia and its host plants. Physiol Plant 130:318–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson D, Silvester W (1993) Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiol Rev 57:293–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bohlman S, Matelson T, Nadkarni N (1995) Moisture and temperature patterns of canopy humus and forest floor soil of a montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 27:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bormann B, Cromack K, Russell W (1994) Influences of red alder on soils and long-term ecosystem productivity. In: Hibbs D, DeBell D, Tarrant R (eds) The biology and management of red alder. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, pp 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burleigh S, Dawson J (1995) Spores of Frankia strain HFPCcI3 nodulate Casuarina equisetifolia after passage through the digestive tracts of captive parakeets (Melopsittacus undulatus). Can J Bot 73:1527–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark K, Nadkarni N, Schaefer D, Gholz H (1998) Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 14:27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Edgar R (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Enloe H, Graham R, Sillett S (2006) Arboreal histosols in old-growth redwood forest canopies, Northern California. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:408–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagan L, Didham R, Winchester N, Behan-Pelletier V, Clayton M, Lindquist E, Ring R (2006) An experimental assessment of biodiversity and species turnover in terrestrial vs canopy leaf litter. Oecologia 147:335–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez M, Meugnier H, Grimont P, Bardin R (1989) Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among members of the genus Frankia. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:424–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths A, McCormick L (1984) Effects of soil acidity on nodulation of Alnus glutinosa and viability of Frankia. Plant Soil 79:429–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hibbs D, Cromack K, Russell W (1994) The biology and management of red alder. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huss-Danell K, Uliassi D, Renberg I (1997) River and lake sediments as sources of infective Frankia (Alnus). Plant Soil 197:35–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leary J, Singleton P, Borthakur D (2004) Canopy nodulation of the endemic tree legume Acacia koa in the mesic forests of Hawaii. Ecology 85:3151–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maffia B, Nadkarni N, Janos D (1993) Vescular–arbuscular mycorrhizae of epiphytic and terrestrial Piperaceae under field and greenhouse conditions. Mycorrhiza 4:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller S, Koo C, Molina R (1992) Early colonization of red alder and Douglas fir by ectomycorrhizal fungi and Frankia in soils from the Oregon coast range. Mycorrhiza 2:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirza B, Welsh A, Rasul G, Rieder J, Paschke M, Hahn D (2009) Variation in Frankia populations of the Elaeagnus host infection group in nodules of six host plant species after inoculation with soil. Microb Ecol 58:384–393. doi:10.1007/s00248-009-9513-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nadkarni N (1981) Canopy roots: convergent evolution in rainforest nutrient cycles. Science 214:1023–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nadkarni N, Longino J (1990) Invertebrates in canopy and ground organic matter in a neotropical montane forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 22:286–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadkarni N, Schaefer D, Matelson T, Solano R (2002) Comparison of arboreal and terrestrial soil characteristics in a lower montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. Pedobiologia 46:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadkarni N, Solano R (2002) Potential effects of climate change on canopy communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach. Oecologia 131:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Normand P, Lapierre P, Tisa L, Gogarten J, Alloisio N, Bagnarol E, Bassi C, Berry A, Bickhart D, Choisne N, Couloux A, Cournoyer B, Cruveiller S, Doubin V, Demange N, Francio M, Goltsman E, Huang Y, Kopp O, Labarre L, Lapidus A, Lavire C, Marechal J, Martinez M, Mastronunzio J, Mullin B, Niemann J, Pujic P, Rawnsley T, Rouy Z, Schenowitz C, Sellstedt A, Tavares F, Tomkins J, Vallenet D, Valverde C, Wall L, Wang Y, Medigue C, Benson D (2007) Genome characteristics of facultatively symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography. Genome Res 17:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perez C, Guevara R, Carmona M, Armesto J (2005) Nitrogen mineralization in epiphytic soils of an old-growth Fitzroya cupressoides forest, southern Chile. Ecoscience 12:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prescott C (2002) The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiology 22:1193–1200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sayed W, Wheeler C, Zahran H, Shoreit A (1997) Effect of temperature of soil moisture on the survival and symbiotic effectiveness of Frankia spp. Biol Fertil Soils 25:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vance C, Smith S, Malcolm J, Huber J, Bellocq M (2007) Differences between forest type and vertical strata in the diversity and composition of hymenopteran families and mymarid genera in northeastern temperate forests. Environ Entomol 36:1073–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Welsh A, Mirza B, Rieder J, Paschke M, Hahn D (2009) Diversity of frankiae in root nodules of Morella pensylvanica grown in soils from five continents. Syst Appl Microbiol 32:201–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Holly Fautisch, David Hooper, August Longino, and Ralph Riley for assistance with climbing and nodule collection, Ingrid Gordon (www.gearforgood.org) for help with climbing gear, Jerry Franklin at Olympic National Park for access to the study site (permit no. OLYM-00234), Dittmar Hahn for advice about Frankia primers and molecular protocols, and L. Higgins, T. Hill, A. Lundgren, M. Palomino, K. Peay, J. Yayha, and J. Fierstein for constructive comments on previous versions of this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by the Lewis & Clark College Rogers Research Fellowship, the Beckman Foundation, the Murdock Charitable Trust, and the National Science Foundation to N.M.N. (OPUS grant DEB 05-42130 and DBI 04-1731).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Kennedy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, P.G., Schouboe, J.L., Rogers, R.H. et al. Frankia and Alnus rubra Canopy Roots: An Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Propagule Availability, and Effects on Soil Nitrogen. Microb Ecol 59, 214–220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9587-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9587-8

Keywords

Navigation