Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of the plain radiograph “shunt series” in the evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure in pediatric patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To our knowledge, the sensitivity of plain radiography, known as the shunt series, in diagnosing an etiology of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt malfunction in children has not been previously investigated.

Objective

To determine the accuracy of plain radiography in diagnosing VP shunt failure in children in whom shunt malfunction is clinically suspected.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 238 children who had undergone plain radiographic examination for evaluation of clinically suspected VP shunt failure over a 5-year period. The results were compared with those of CT, MRI, and nuclear cisternography.

Results

Just 6.72% of patients demonstrated plain radiographic signs of shunt failure. Of patients with normal plain radiographs, 43% demonstrated shunt abnormalities on CT, MRI or cisternography. Statistical analysis indicated that no more than 10.46% (P < 0.05) of plain radiographs showed signs of failure and that the sensitivity of plain radiography for the detection of VP shunt failure is no higher than 31%. Furthermore, there was poor agreement between the results of plain radiography and those of CT, MRI and cisternography.

Conclusion

Children with clinically suspected VP shunt failure should proceed directly to cross-sectional or nuclear imaging, as plain radiographic examinations have low sensitivity and significant false-negative rates for detecting shunt abnormalities in all-comers. Use of the shunt series should be limited to patients who specifically have suspected mechanical causes of shunt failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Von Winning H (1987) Portrayal of pathological symptoms in pre-Columbian Mexico. Pearson Museum, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams F (1925) Hippocrates: the genuine works of Hippocrates, vol 1. William Wood, New York, pp 353–391

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rekate HL (1994) Pediatric neurosurgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 202–220

    Google Scholar 

  4. Townsend C (2004) Sabiston textbook of surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 2175

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coffin JG (1825) Domestic medicine, or, a treatise on the prevention and cure of diseases by regimen and simple medicines. Phelps & Farnham, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter TB (2004) Medical devices of the head, neck, and spine. Radiographics 24:257–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bondurant CP, Jimenez DF (1995) Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:254–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pudenz RH (1981) The surgical treatment of hydrocephalus: an historical review. Surg Neurol 15:15–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Browd S, Ragel B, Gottfried O (2006) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Part I: obstruction and mechanical failure. Pediatr Neurol 34:83–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake J, Kestle J, Milner R et al (1998) Randomized trial of CSF shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 43:294–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Browd S, Gottfried O, Ragel B et al (2006) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. Pediatr Neurol 34:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dominguez CJ, Tyagi A, Hall G et al (2000) Sub-galeal coiling of the proximal and distal components of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. An unusual complication and proposed mechanism. Childs Nerv Syst 16:493–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woerdeman PA, Hanlo PW (2006) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt occlusion due to spontaneous intraabdominal knot formation in the catheter. Case report. J Neurosurg 105(3 Suppl):231–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sami A, Ait Ben Ali S, Choukry M et al (1995) Anal migration of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt catheter. Apropos of 3 cases. Neurochirurgie 41:315–318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goetz CG (2003) Textbook of clinical neurology, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 556

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goeser CD, McLeary MS, Young LW (1998) Diagnostic imaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunctions and complications. Radiographics 18:635–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garton HJ, Kestle JR, Drake JM (2001) Predicting shunt failure on the basis of clinical symptoms and signs in children. J Neurosurg 94:202–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffey T, Ledbetter S, Khorasani R (2006) Yield and utility of radiographic shunt series in the evaluation of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. Acad Emerg Med 13(Suppl 1):S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murtagh FR (1979) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt function and hydrocephalus in the pediatric age group: a radiographic/clinical correlation. Radiology 132:385–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John B. Amodio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, K.R., Babb, J.S. & Amodio, J.B. The utility of the plain radiograph “shunt series” in the evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 37, 452–456 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0431-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0431-3

Keywords

Navigation