Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two signs indicative of successful access in nuclear medicine cerebrospinal fluid diversionary shunt studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Successful shunt access is the first step in a properly performed nuclear medicine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt study.

Objective

To determine the significance of the radiotracer configuration at the injection site during initial nuclear medicine CSF shunt imaging and the lack of early systemic radiotracer activity as predictors of successful shunt access.

Materials and methods

With Institutional Review Board approval, three nuclear medicine physicians performed a retrospective review of all consecutive CSF shunt studies performed in children at our institution in 2015. Antecedent nuclear medicine CSF shunt studies in these patients were also assessed and included in the review. The appearance of the reservoir site immediately after radiotracer injection was classified as either figure-of-eight or round/ovoid configuration. The presence or absence of early systemic distribution of the tracer on the 5-min static images was noted and separately evaluated.

Results

A total of 98 nuclear medicine ventriculoperitoneal CSF shunt studies were evaluated. Figure-of-eight configuration was identified in 87% of studies and, when present, had 93% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 92% accuracy, 98% positive predictive value (PPV) and 54% negative predictive value (NPV) as a predictor of successful shunt access. Early systemic activity was absent in 89 of 98 studies. Lack of early systemic distribution of the radiotracer had 98% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 96% accuracy, 98% PPV and 78% NPV as a predictor of successful shunt access. Figure-of-eight configuration in conjunction with the absence of early systemic tracer activity had 99% PPV for successful shunt access.

Conclusion

Figure-of-eight configuration at the injection site or lack of early systemic radiotracer activity had moderate specificity for successful shunt access. Specificity and PPV significantly improved when both signs were combined in assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hegde A, Nair RP, Ganapathy S et al (2016) Shunt malfunction in patients with hydrocephalus: complications revisited. BMJ Case Rep 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-213619

  2. Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JR, Holubkov R et al (2016) Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:382–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle TP, Nigrovic LE (2015) Radiographic evaluation of pediatric cerebrospinal fluid shunt malfunction in the emergency setting. Pediatr Emerg Care 31:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maller VV, Agarwal A, Kanekar S (2016) Imaging of ventricular shunts. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 37:159–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace AN, McConathy J, Menias CO et al (2014) Imaging evaluation of CSF shunts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:38–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sivaganesan A, Krishnamurthy R, Sahni D et al (2012) Neuroimaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in children. Pediatr Radiol 42:1029–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. May CH, Aurisch R, Kornrumpf D et al (1999) Evaluation of shunt function in hydrocephalic patients with the radionuclide 99mTc-pertechnetate. Childs Nerv Syst 15:239–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vassilyadi M, Tataryn ZL, Matzinger MA et al (2006) Radioisotope shuntograms at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Childs Nerv Syst 22:43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson EM, Wagner K, Kronfeld K et al (2014) Using a 2-variable method in radionuclide shuntography to predict shunt patency. J Neurosurg 121:1504–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Treves ST, SpringerLink (Online service) (2007) Pediatric Nuclear Medicine/PET. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Vernet O, Farmer JP, Lambert R et al (1996) Radionuclide shuntogram: adjunct to manage hydrocephalic patients. J Nucl Med 37:406–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Key CB, Rothrock SG, Falk JL (1995) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt complications: an emergency medicine perspective. Pediatr Emerg Care 11:265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rocque BG, Lapsiwala S, Iskandar BJ (2008) Ventricular shunt tap as a predictor of proximal shunt malfunction in children: a prospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vega RA, Buscher MG, Gonzalez MS et al (2013) Sonographic localization of a nonpalpable shunt: Ultrasound-assisted ventricular shunt tap. Surg Neurol Int 4:101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rickham PP (1964) A ventriculostomy reservoir. Br Med J 2:173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott RM (1991) Shunt malfunction and the Rickham reservoir. Neurosurgery 28:167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiser HC, Gilbert JW (1990) Needle size for puncture of a Rickham reservoir. Surg Neurol 33:230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schlosser HG, Crawack HJ, Miethke C et al (2016) An improved reservoir for the flushing test to diagnose shunt insufficiency. Neurosurg Focus 41:E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald A, Burrell S (2009) Infrequently performed studies in nuclear medicine: part 2. J Nucl Med Technol 37:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehnert BE, Rahbar H, Relyea-Chew A et al (2011) Detection of ventricular shunt malfunction in the ED: relative utility of radiography, CT, and nuclear imaging. Emerg Radiol 18:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O'Brien DF, Taylor M, Park TS et al (2003) A critical analysis of 'normal' radionucleotide shuntograms in patients subsequently requiring surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 19:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouellette D, Lynch T, Bruder E et al (2009) Additive value of nuclear medicine shuntograms to computed tomography for suspected cerebrospinal fluid shunt obstruction in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 25:827–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiewvit S, Nuntaaree S, Kanchaanapiboon P, Chiewvit P (2014) Assessment lumboperitoneal or ventriculoperitoneal shunt patency by radionuclide technique: a review experience cases. World J Nucl Med 13:75–84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chervu S, Chervu LR, Vallabhajosyula B et al (1984) Quantitative evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow. J Nucl Med 25:91–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wynchank S, Brendel AJ, Castel JP et al (1984) Re: Quantitative evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow. J Nucl Med 25:1269–1270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brendel AJ, Wynchank S, Castel JP et al (1983) Cerebrospinal shunt flow in adults: radionuclide quantitation with emphasis on patient position. Radiology 149:815–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawrance SK (2003) Cerebrospinal fluid imaging. In: Sandler MP (ed) Diagnostic nuclear medicine, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA

  28. Di Rocco C, Turgut M, Jallo GI Martinez-Lage J (2015) Complications of CSF shunting in hydrocephalus prevention, identification, and management. Springer, Heidelberg

  29. Gok B, Batra S, Eslamy H et al (2013) Radionuclide shunt patency study for suspected ventriculoatrial shunt malfunction. Clin Nucl Med 38:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Mohammed S. Bermo, Hedieh Khalatbari & Marguerite T. Parisi

  2. Department of Radiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA

    Hedieh Khalatbari & Marguerite T. Parisi

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

    Marguerite T. Parisi

Authors
  1. Mohammed S. Bermo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hedieh Khalatbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marguerite T. Parisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed S. Bermo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bermo, M.S., Khalatbari, H. & Parisi, M.T. Two signs indicative of successful access in nuclear medicine cerebrospinal fluid diversionary shunt studies. Pediatr Radiol 48, 1130–1138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4150-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4150-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation