Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Palmar arch modulation in patients with hemiparesis after a stroke

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hand shape modulation has traditionally been studied within the framework of reach-to-grasp tasks by examining the control of arm transport, grip aperture scaling, and finger joint excursions. However, global parameters characterizing arm and hand movement can be enhanced by additional knowledge of biomechanical changes in the hand. We previously examined palmar arch modulation during grasping in healthy subjects by identifying thenar and hypothenar displacement. This method was used to characterize hand shape modulation in 10 stroke survivors with mild hand paresis, as assessed by the Chedoke-McMaster clinical scale, during two types of grasps (spherical, cylindrical). Palmar arch modulation was examined during the three phases of prehensile movement: transport shaping (P1), preshaping (P2), and contact shaping (P3). Compared to the control group, the stroke survivors showed significant differences (spherical: F 2,18 = 12.025, P < 0.001; cylindrical: F 2,18 = 9.054, P < 0.001) in palmar arch modulation particularly during P3 wherein fine adjustments are made to the grip in preparation for object manipulation. While control subjects completed most of hand shape modulation early in the task, stroke survivors took longer to complete each phase. Furthermore, stroke survivors started with a flatter hand which required relatively more arch modulation during the latter part of the task, thereby reflecting a temporal and spatial concurrency between the phases. Stroke survivors with well-recovered hand grasping ability tended to incorporate compensations/adaptations in hand posture during specific grasping phases. Palmar arch analysis provides us with a more complete understanding about how hand biomechanics, specifically palmar concavity articulation, is changed post-stroke. This will allow us to better identify the motor compensations used for grasping and to re-focus rehabilitation interventions to reduce compensations and improve functional motor recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ada L, Canning CG, Carr JH, Kilbreath SL, Shepherd RB (1994) Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation. In: Stelmach GE, Vroon PA (eds) Insights into the reach to grasp movement, vol 105. North-Holland, The Netherlands; Elsevier Science B.V., pp 239–265

  • Alaverdashvili M, Foroud A, Lim DH, Whishaw IQ (2008) “Learned baduse” limits recovery of skilled reaching for food after forelimb motor cortex stroke in rates: a new analysis of the effect of gestures on success. Behav Brain Res 188:281–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ansuini C, Santello M, Massaccesi S, Castiello U (2006) Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. J Neurophysiol 95:2456–2465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Backman C, Cork S, Gibson D, Parsons J (1992) Assessment of hand function: the relation between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Therapy 59:208–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnstrom S (1970) Movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. Harper & Row Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev: Neurosci 6:726–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HC, Lin KC, Chen CL, Wu CY (2008) The beneficial effects of a functional task target on reaching and postural balance in patients with right cerebral vascular accidents. Motor Control 12(2):122–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cirstea MC, Levin MF (2000) Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123(5):940–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Prablanc C (1997) Postural control of three dimensional prehension movements. J Neurophysiol 77:452–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Rossetti Y, Arzi M, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C, Mignot JC (1995) Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 74:905–910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Arzi M, Rossetti Y, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C (1996) Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 110:265–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Grea H, Prablanc C (1998) Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 119(4):511–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Goussev V, Sangole AP, Levin MF (2007) Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Exp Brain Res 165:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fries W, Danek A, Scheidtmann K, Hamburger C (1993) Motor recovery following capsular stroke. Brain 116:369–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Caselli L, Secchi C (2003) Finger control in the tripod grasp. Exp Brain Res 149:351–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S et al (1993) Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 24(1):58–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1999) Visuomotor channels: their integration in goal-directed prehension. Hum Mov Science 18:201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamper DG, Cruz EG, Siegel MP (2003) Stereotypical fingertip trajectories during grasp. J Neurophysiol 90(6):3702–3710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapandji IA (1982) Physiology of the joints—upper extremities, vol 1. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S (2002) Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 33:1840–1844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landsmeer JMF (1962) Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis 21:164–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levangie PK, Norkin CC (2001) The wrist and hand complex. In: Davis FA Joint structure and function, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, pp 251–289

  • Levin MF, Michaelsen S, Cirstea C, Roby-Brami A (2002) Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 143:171–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OJ (1977) Joints remodeling and the evolution of the human hand. J Anat 123:157–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Feldman AG (1995) Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk. J Neurophysiol 73(5):2120–2122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mamassian P (1997) Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 114(2):235–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mark LS, Nemeth K, Gardner D, Dainoff MJ, Paasche J, Duffy M, Grandt K (1997) Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. J Exp Psych: Hum Percept Perform 23:1365–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mason CR, Gomez JE, Ebner TJ (2001) Hand synergies during reach-to-grasp. J Neurophysiol 86(6):2896–2910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J (2002) Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1035–1042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, Levin MF (2004) Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 157(2):162–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen SM, Magdalon EC, Levin MF (2009) Grip aperture scaling to object size in chronic stroke. Motor Control 13(2):197–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, Wittenberg G, Weltz D, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M (2002) Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol 59:1278–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 38B(4):902–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DA (2008) The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(8):1439–1450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1990) The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res 79:431–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilon JF, DeSerres SJ, Feldman AG (2007) Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force. Exp Brain Res 181(1):49–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MK, Stelmach GE (2005) Effect of orienting the finger opposition space in the control of reach-to-grasp. J Mot Behav 37(1):65–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Biryukova EV, Bussel B, Levin MF (2003) Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 107(5):369–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Loukopoulos LD, Meulenbroek RGJ, Vaughan F, Engelbrecht SE (1995) Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol Rev 102:28–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi E, Mitniski A, Feldman AG (2002) Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans. J Physiol 538:659–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saling M, Mescheriakov S, Molokanova E, Stelmach GE, Berger M (1996) Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture. Exp Brain Res 108:493–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sangole AP, Levin MF (2007) A new perspective in the understanding of hand dysfunction following neurological injury. Top Stroke Rehab 14(3):80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangole AP, Levin MF (2008a) Arches of the hand in reach to grasp. J Biomech. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.006

  • Sangole AP, Levin MF (2008b) Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks. Exp Brain Res 190:443–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santello M, Soechting JF (1997) Matching object size by controlling finger span and hand shape. Somatosens Motor Res 14(3):203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santello M, Soechting JF (1998) Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. J Neurophysiol 79(3):1307–1320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF (1998) Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci 18(23):10105–10115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF (2002) Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. J Neurosci 22(4):1426–1435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (1999) A new view on grasping. Motor Control 3(3):237–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1993) Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 70(3):1137–1150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Mot Behav 26(2):178–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trombly CA (1992) Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Therapy 46(10):887–897

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Bergen E, Swieten LM, Williams JHG, Mon-Williams M (2007) The effect of orientation on prehension movement time. Exp Brain Res 178:180–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

APS was supported by a Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Quebec (FRSQ) fellowship. The research was conducted at the Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, during her postdoctoral term at McGill University. The authors express sincere gratitude to the participants, to the students—Liza Azeff, Mi Yun, Olivier Vourantonis, and Luis Alberto Knaut who assisted on various aspects of data recording as well as to Dr. Valeri Goussev for his assistance with data analysis. MFL holds a Canada Research Chair in Motor Recovery and Rehabilitation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, 2900 Edouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada

    Archana P. Sangole

  2. Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Archana P. Sangole

  3. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mindy F. Levin

  4. School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada

    Mindy F. Levin

Authors
  1. Archana P. Sangole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mindy F. Levin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archana P. Sangole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sangole, A.P., Levin, M.F. Palmar arch modulation in patients with hemiparesis after a stroke. Exp Brain Res 199, 59–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1972-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1972-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation