Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At a descriptive level, prehension movements can be partitioned into three components ensuring, respectively, the transport of the arm to the vicinity of the target, the orientation of the hand according to object tilt, and the grasp itself. Several authors have suggested that this analytic description may be an operational principle for the organization of the motor system. This hypothesis, called “visuomotor channels hypothesis,” is in particular supported by experiments showing a parallelism between the reach and grasp components of prehension movements. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether or not the generalization of the visuomotor channels hypothesis, from its initial form, restricted to the grasp and transport components, to its actual form, including the reach orientation and grasp components, may be well founded. Six subjects were required to reach and grasp cylindrical objects presented at a given location, with different orientations. During the movements, object orientation was either kept constant (unperturbed trials) or modified at movement onset (perturbed trials). Results showed that both wrist path (sequence of positions that the hand follows in space), and wrist trajectory (time sequence of the successive positions of the hand) were strongly affected by object orientation and by the occurrence of perturbations. These observations suggested strongly that arm transport and hand orientation were neither planned nor controlled independently. The significant linear regressions observed, with respect to the time, between arm displacement (integral of the magnitude of the velocity vector) and forearm rotation also supported this view. Interestingly, hand orientation was not implemented at only the distal level, demonstrating that all the redundant degrees of freedom available were used by the motor system to achieve the task. The final configuration reached by the arm was very stable for a given final orientation of the object to grasp. In particular, when object tilt was suddenly modified at movement onset, the correction brought the upper limb into the same posture as that obtained when the object was initially presented along the final orientation reached after perturbation. Taken together, the results described in the present study suggest that arm transport and hand orientation do not constitute independent visuomotor channels. They also further suggest that prehension movements are programmed, from an initial configuration, to reach smoothly a final posture that corresponds to a given “location and orientation” as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alstermark B, Lundberg A, Norrrsell U, Sybirska E (1981) Integration in the descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 9. Differential behavioural defects after spinal cord lesion interrupting defined pathways from higher centers to motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 42:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Alstermark B, Gorska T, Lundberg A, Petterson L-G (1990) Integration in the descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat. 16. Visually guided switching of target-reaching. Exp Brain Res 80:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib MA (1981) Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In: Brooks VB (ed) Motor control. (Handbook of physiology, section 1, The nervous system, vol II. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1449–1480

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib MA, Iberall T, Lyons D (1985) Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand. Exp Brain Res [Suppl] 10:111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:(9) 2318–2330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MaKenzie CL, Zaal FT (1994) The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res 98:535–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman J, Kuypers H (1972) Splitbrain monkeys: cerebral control of ipsilateral and controlateral arm, hand, and finger movements. Science 176:536–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castiello U, Bennett KMB, Paulignan Y (1992) Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching? Behav Brain Res 50:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Chieffi S, Gentilucci M (1993) Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 94:471–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Chieffi S, Gentilluci M, Allport A, Sasso E, Rizzolatti G (1993) Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Brain 116:1119–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC (1989) The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain 112:749–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruse H (1986) Constraints for joint angle control of the human arm. Biol Cybern 54:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse H, Wishmeyer E, Brüwer M, Brockfeld P, Dress A (1990) On the cost functions for the control of the human arm movement. Biol Cybern 62:519–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C, Prablanc C (1994) Aspect of multi-joint flexibility in a power grip task. 17th Annual Meeting of European Neurosciences Association, Vienna

  • Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Rossetti Y, Arzi M, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C (1995) Postural and synergic control for three dimensionnal movements of reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 74:905–910

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fikes TG, Klatzky R, Lederman SJ (1994) Effects of object texture on precontact movement time in human prehension. J Mot Behav 26:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts P (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders M, Tillery SIH, Soechting JF (1992) Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation. Behav Brain Sci 15:309–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H (1994) Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. Neuroreport 5:1525–1529

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Rizzolatti G (1990) Cortical control of arm and hand movements. In: Goodale M (ed) Vision and action: the control of grasping. Norwood, NJ, pp 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Fogassi L, Lupino G, Matelli M, Camarda R, Rizzolatti G (1988) Functional organisation of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and control of proximal movements. Exp Brain Res 71:475–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umilta C, Rizzolatti G (1991) Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 29:361–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Scarpa M, Castiello U (1992) Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation. Behav Brain Res 47:71–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. 1. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99: 97–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing AM (1991) Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension. Neurosci Letters 122:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Wing A (1995) Coordinated responses folowing mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension. Exp Brain Res 102:483–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff B, Arbib M (1993) Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Mot Behav 25:(3) 175–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1992) Muscle behavior may solve motor coordination problems. In: Berthoz A, Graf W, Vidal P (eds) Eye-hand sensori-motor system. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM (1988) Fundamentals of motor behavior. In: Osherson D (ed) Invitation to cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Chap. 16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Atkeson CG (1986) Characterization of joint-Interpolated arm movements. In: Heuer H, Fromm C (eds) Generation and modulation of action patterns. (Exp Brain Res Series 15). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar movements. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hore J, Watts S, Vilis T (1992) Constraints on arm position when pointing in three dimensions: Donders' law and the Fick gimbal strategy. J Neurophysiol 68:374–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hore J, Watts S, Tweed D (1994) Arm position constraints when throwing in three dimensions. J Neurophysiol 72:1171–1180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension. J Mot Behav 16:235–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1986) Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: a study in normal and brain-damaged subjects. Neuropsychologia 24:41–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1992) Coordination mechanisms in prehension movements. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (ed) Tutorials in motor behavior II. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 265–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1994) The hand and the object: the role of posterior parietal cortex in forming motor representations. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72:535–541

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Biguer B (1982) Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extrapersonnal space. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 387–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M, Decety J, Michel F (1994) Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 22:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima R, Itoh H, Ono S, Satoh K, Furumoto S, Gotoh R, Koyama M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi T, Yanagisawa T, Fukuda H (1995) Activity in the human primary cortex related to arm and finger movements. Neuroreport 6:238–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Maioli C (1994a) Independent control of limb position and contact forces in cat posture. J Neurophysiol 72:1476–1495

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Maioli C (1994b) Coordinate transformations in the control of cat posture. J Neurophysiol 72:1496–1515

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF (1982) Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task. J Neurosci 2:399–08

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay WA (1992) Properties of reach related neuronal activity in cortical area 7a. J Neurophysiol 67:1335–1345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL (1990) Invariance and variability in human prehension: implications for theory development. In: Goodale M (ed) Vision and action: the control of grasping. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LE, Theeuwen M, Gielen CCAM (1992) The control of arm pointing movements in three dimensions. Exp Brain Res 90:415–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napier (1956) The prehensible movements of the human hand. J Bone Jt Surg 38B:902–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Palastanga N., Field D, Soames R (1994) Anatomy and human movement: structure and functions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M (in press) Prehension movements: the visuomotor channels hypothesis revisited. In: Haggard P, Flanagan R, Wing A (eds) Hand and brain: neurophysiology and psychology of hand movement. Academic, Orlando

  • Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M (1991a) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R (1991b) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 87:407–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaget J (1973) Biologie et connaissance. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M (1988) Functionnal organisation of the inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 71:490–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Engelbrecht SE, Bushe MM, Loukopoulos LD (1993) Knowledge model for selecting and producing reaching movements. J Mot Behav 25:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Meckler C, Prablanc C (1994) Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Exp Brain Res 99:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF (1984) Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man. Exp Brain Res 54:121–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1993) Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 70:1137–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49:548–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M (1994) Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Mot Behav 26:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Straumnn D, Haslwanter T, Hepp-Reymond M-C, Hepp K (1991) Listing's law for eye, head and arm movements and their synergistic control. Exp Brain Res 86:209–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H (1990) Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movements. Exp Brain Res 83:29–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vercher JL, Magenes G, Prablanc C, Gauthier GM (1994) Eye-head-hand coordination in pointing at visual targets: spatial and temporal analysis. Exp Brain Res 99:507–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace SA, Weeks DL (1988) Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. J Mot Behav 20:81–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Fraser C (1983) The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:297–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaal FTJM, Bootsma RJ (1993) Accuracy demands in natural prehension. Hum Mov Sci 12:339–345

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vision et Motricité, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 94, F-69500, Bron, France

    Michel Desmurget, Claude Prablanc, Mohammad Arzi, Yves Rossetti, Yves Paulignan & Christian Urquizar

Authors
  1. Michel Desmurget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claude Prablanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Arzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yves Rossetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yves Paulignan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Urquizar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desmurget, M., Prablanc, C., Arzi, M. et al. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 110, 265–278 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00228557

Key words

Search

Navigation