Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of glycerol on pigments and monacolin K production by the high-monacolin K-producing but citrinin-free strain, Monascus pilosus MS-1

  • Orginal Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glycerol is the principal by-product of biodiesel production which can be utilized by fungi for beneficial metabolites production. In this study, effects of glycerol on main metabolites production and gene expression of pigment and monacolin K (MK) synthesis-related genes of Monascus pilosus MS-1, a high-MK-producing but citrinin-free strain, were investigated. The results indicated that addition of glycerol could increase the dry cell weight but decrease the fermentation broth pH value. Pigments production could be enhanced significantly after adding 2 g/L glycerol and the maximum pigments yield (13.78 U/mL) of fermentation broth was obtained when the glycerol content was up to 40 g/L (p < 0.05). Effect of glycerol on MK production was different from that of Monascus pigment. MK yield of fermentation broth was decreased significantly when the glycerol addition was up to 10 g/L while that of mycelia could be improved as glycerol addition increased (p < 0.05). Results of real-time PCR revealed that when the glycerol additions were up to 40 and 300 g/L, respectively, the gene expressions of regulatory gene (ctnR) for pigment synthesis were 17.31- and 22.22-folds of ctnR in the control; the gene expressions of structural gene (PKS5) for pigment synthesis were 33.27- and 60.07-folds of PKS5 in the control; respectively. However, the gene expressions of regulatory (mkH) and structural (mkA) genes of MS-1 for MK production were decreased after adding glycerol. All this suggesting that glycerol can be used for improving production of citrinin-free Monascus pigments and MK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chatzifragkou A, Papanikolaou S (2012) Effect of impurities in biodiesel-derived waste glycerol on the performance and feasibility of biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95(1):13–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu LP, Zhang BB, Xu GR (2013) Efficient conversion of high concentration of glycerol to monacolin K by solid-state fermentation of Monascus purpureus using bagasse as carrier. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36(3):293–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobson R, Gray V, Rumbold K (2012) Microbial utilization of crude glycerol for the production of value-added products. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39(2):217–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyake T, Uchitomi K, Zhang MY, Kono I, Nozaki N, Sammoto H, Inagaki K (2006) Effects of the principal nutrients on lovastatin production by Monascus pilosus. Biosci Biotech Bioch 70(5):1154–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tallapragada P, Dikshit R, Dessai PT (2013) Effect of glycerol as a sole carbon source on Monascus sp. for pigment production. Int Food Res J 20(6):3265–3268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bühler RMM, Dutra AC, Vendruscolo F, Moritz DE, Ninow JL (2013) Monascus pigment production in bioreactor using a co-product of biodiesel as substrate. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) 33:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turner WB (1971) Fungal metabolites, vol 15. Academic Press, London, pp 445–476

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li L, Shao YC, Li Q, Yang S, Chen FS (2010) Identification of Mga1, a G-protein α-subunit gene involved in regulating citrinin and pigment production in Monascus ruber M7. FEMS Microbiol Lett 308(2):108–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi YC, Pan TM (2011) Beneficial effects of Monascus purpureus NTU 568-fermented products: a review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90(4):1207–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jůzlová P, Martínková L, Křen V (1996) Secondary metabolites of the fungus Monascus: a review. J Ind Microbiol Biot 16(3):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng YL, Shao YC, Chen FS (2012) Monascus pigments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96(6):1421–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim C, Jung H, Kim YO, Shin CS (2006) Antimicrobial activities of amino acid derivatives of monascus pigments. FEMS Microbiol Lett 264(1):117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patakova P (2013) Monascus secondary metabolites: production and biological activity. J Ind Microbiol Biot 40(2):169–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Akihisa T, Tokuda H, Ukiya M, Kiyota A, Yasukawa K, Sakamoto N, Kimura Y, Suzuki T, Takayasu J, Nishino H (2005) Anti-tumor-initiating effects of monascin, an azaphilonoid pigment from the extract of Monascus pilosus fermented rice (red-mold rice). Chem Biodivers 2(10):1305–1309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Su NW, Lin YL, Lee MH, Ho CY (2005) Ankaflavin from Monascus-fermented red rice exhibits selective cytotoxic effect and induces cell death on Hep G2 cells. J Agric Food Chem 53(6):1949–1954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng Y, Xin Y, Shi X, Guo Y (2010) Cytotoxicity of Monascus pigments and their derivatives to human cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem 58(17):9523–9528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JH, Kim HJ, Kim C, Jung H, Kim YO, Ju JY, Shin CS (2007) Development of lipase inhibitors from various derivatives of Monascus pigment produced by Monascus fermentation. Food Chem 101(1):357–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Kim HJ, Park HW, Youn SH, Choi DY, Shin CS (2007) Development of inhibitors against lipase and α-glucosidase from derivatives of Monascus pigment. FEMS Microbiol Lett 276(1):93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Velmurugan P, Kim MJ, Park JS, Karthikeyan K, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P, Lee KJ, Park YJ, Oh BT (2010) Dyeing of cotton yarn with five water soluble fungal pigments obtained from five fungi. Fiber Polym 11(4):598–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Velmurugan P, Kamala Kannan S, Balachandar V, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P, Chae JC, Oh BT (2010) Natural pigment extraction from five filamentous fungi for industrial applications and dyeing of leather. Carbohydr Polym 79(2):262–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Calvo C, Salvador A (2002) Comparative study of the colorants Monascus and cochineal used in the preparation of gels made with various gelling agents. Food Hydrocolloid 16:523–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sang-aroon W, Saekow S, Amornkitbamrung V (2012) Density functional theory study on the electronic structure of Monascus dyes as photosensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A 236:35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito S, Saitou T, Imahori H, Uehara H, Hasegawa N (2010) Fabrication of dye-sensitized solar cells using natural dye for food pigment: monascus yellow. Energy Environ Sci 3(7):905–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Endo A (1980) Monacoiln K, a new hypocholesterolemic agent that specifically inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase. J Antibiot XXXIII(3):334–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ho BY, Pan TM (2009) The Monascus metabolite monacolin K reduces tumor progression and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma cells. J Agric Food Chem 57(18):8258–8265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Valera HR, Gomes J, Lakshmi S, Gururaja R, Suryanarayan S, Kumar D (2005) Lovastatin production by solid state fermentation using Aspergillus flavipes. Enzyme Microb Tech 37(5):521–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Subhasree RS, Babu PD, Vidyalakshmi R, Mohan VC (2011) Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on stimulation of pigment produciton by Monascus purpureus on Jackfruit seeds. Intl J Microbiol Res 2(2):184–187

    Google Scholar 

  28. Said F, Brooks J, Chisti Y (2014) Optimal C: N ratio for the production of red pigments by Monascus ruber. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30(9):2471–2479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bühler RMM, Dutra AC, Vendruscolo F, Moritz DE, Ninow JL (2013) Monascus pigment production in bioreactor using a co-product of biodiesel as substrate. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) 33(1):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rashmi D, Padmavathi T (2013) Exploring Monascus sanguineus as a potential natural source for pigment production. Int Res J Biological Sci 2(5):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  31. Babitha S, Soccol CR, Pandey A (2007) Effect of stress on growth, pigment production and morphology of Monascus sp. in solid cultures. J Basic Microbiol 47(2):118–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng YL, Shao YC, Zhou YX, Chen FS (2014) Monacolin K production by citrinin-free Monascus pilosus MS-1 and fermentation process monitoring. Eng Life Sci 14(5):538–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Feng YL, Shao YC, Zhou YX, Chen FS (2014) Production and optimization of monacolin K by citrinin-free Monascus pilosus MS-1 in solid-state fermentation using non-glutinous rice and soybean flours as substrate. Eur Food Res Technol 239(4):629–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li ZQ, Guo F (2003) Morphology and taxology of Monascus spp. China Light Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen MH, Johns MR (1993) Effect of pH and nitrogen source on pigment production by Monascus purpureus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 40(1):132–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Orozco SFB, Kilikian BV (2008) Effect of pH on citrinin and red pigments production by Monascus purpureus CCT3802. World J Microb Biot 24(2):263–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dikshit R, Tallapragada P (2013) Comparative study of Monascus sanguineus and Monascus purpureus for red pigment production under stress condition. Int Food Res J 20(3):1235–1238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Carels M, Shepherd D (1977) The effect of different nitrogen sources on pigment production and sporulation of Monascus species in submerged, shaken culture. Can J Microbiol 23(10):1360–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang B, Zhang X, Wu Z, Qi H, Wang Z (2013) Effect of pH and nonionic surfactant on profile of intracellular and extracellular Monascus pigments. Process Biochem 48(5–6):759–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hajjaj H, Niederberger P, Duboc P (2001) Lovastatin biosynthesis by Aspergillus terreus in a chemically defined medium. Appl Environ Microb 67(6):2596–2602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31330059, 31171649, 31271834, and 31371824).

Conflict of interest

None.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fusheng Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Y., Shao, Y., Zhou, Y. et al. Effects of glycerol on pigments and monacolin K production by the high-monacolin K-producing but citrinin-free strain, Monascus pilosus MS-1. Eur Food Res Technol 240, 635–643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2365-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2365-y

Keywords

Navigation