Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective randomized trial comparing synthetic vs biological out-in transobturator tape: a mean 3-year follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to prospectively and randomly compare the outcome of surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using the same outside–inside transobturator technique with biological (PelviLaceTO®) or synthetic (UretexTO®) material sling, evaluating if the biological material can prevent vaginal erosion retaining the “cure rate” of this surgical technique.

Methods

Seventy patients with SUI were selected, randomly assigned to either UretexTO® (n = 34) or PelviLaceTO® (n = 36), and underwent the same surgery.

Results

There is no significant difference between two study arms with regard to objective and subjective cure rates and quality of life. In both groups we had an overlap cure rate (UretexTO® group 88.2% vs PelviLaceTO® group 88.8%) at mean 3 years follow-up. It found no perioperative complications nor vaginal erosions.

Conclusions

UretexTO® and PelviLaceTO® are two similarly safe and efficient slings in the management of SUI, with a good patient satisfaction and without any complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petros P, Ulmsten U (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan Suppl 153:7–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delorme E (2001) La bandelette trans-obturatrice: un procede mini-invasif pour tra iter l’incontinence urinaire d’effort de la femme. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R (2003) La bandelette trans-obturatrice (Uratape®). Un nouveau procédé mini-invasif de traitement de l’incontinence urinaire de la femme. Prog Urol 13:656–659

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Domingo S, Alamá P, Ruiz N, Perales A, Pellicer A (2005) Diagnosis, management and prognosis of vaginal erosion after transobturator suburethral tape procedure using a nonwoven thermally bonded polypropylene mesh. J Urol 173:1627–1630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galmès Belmonte I, Diaz Gomez E (2004) Son iguales todos los sistemas empleados para corregir la incontinencia urinaria mediante mallas libres de tensión? Actas Urol Esp 28:487–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Natale F, La Penna C, Padoa A, Agostini M, De Simone E, Cervigni M (2009) A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:75–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudnicki M (2007) Biomesh (Pelvicol) erosion following repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:693–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Auward W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:324–327

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ingelman-Sundberg A, Ulmsten U (1983) Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Contrib Gynecol Obstet 10:51–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crystle CD, Charme LS, Copeland WE (1971) Q-tip test in stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 38:313–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. BJOG 104:1374–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C (2003) A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, North JH Jr (2006) Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg 63:255–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Novara G, Galfano A, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V et al (2008) Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 53:288–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kobashi K (2009) Management of erosion of graft materials in pelvic floor reconstruction. Sci World J 9:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spinosa JP, Dubuis PY, Riederer B (2007) Transobturator surgery for female stress incontinence: a comparative anatomical study of outside-in vs inside-out techniques. BJU Int 100:1097–1102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Lancey JO (1988) Struttural aspects of the extrinsic continence mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 72:296–301

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deprest J, Zheng F, Konstantinovic M, Spelzini F, Chaerhout F, Steensma A et al (2006) The biology behind fascia defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:S16–S25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabah DM, Spiess PE, Begin LR (2002) Tissue reaction of the rabbit urinary bladder to tensionfree vaginal tape and porcine small intestinal submucosa. BJU 90:601–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoenmaeckers EJ, van der Valk SB, van den Hout HW, Raymakers JF, Rakic S (2009) Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Surg Endosc 23:1620–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LeBlanc KA (2001) Complications associated with the plug-and-patch method of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 5:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. García-Ureña MA, Vega Ruiz V, Díaz Godoy A, Báez Perea JM, Marín Gómez LM, Carnero Hernández FJ et al (2007) Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. Am J Surg 193:538–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Sesti F et al (2008) TVT-O vs TVT: a randomized trial in patients with different degrees of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:917–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Minaglia S, Ozel B, Hurtado E, Klutke CG, Klutke JJ (2005) Effect of transobturator tape procedure on proximal urethral mobility. Urology 65:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gandhi S, Kubba LM, Abramov Y, Botros SM, Goldberg RP, Victor TA et al (2005) Histopathologic changes of porcine dermis xenografts for transvaginal suburethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1643–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roth CC, Winter JC, Woodruff AJ (2007) What’s new in slings: an update on midurethral slings. Curr Opin Urol 17:242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Tayrac R, Alves A, Thérin M (2007) Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery. A pilot study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients who have placed their trust on us and allowed us to study, learn, and grow and Sandy Langford for her help with translation.

Integrity of research and reporting

The authors Raffaele Paparella, Monia Marturano, Laura Pelino, Alessandra Scarpa, Giovanni Scambia, Giuseppe La Torre, Pierluigi Paparella, qualify by having participated actively and sufficiently in the study reported. The authors give their final approval of the version of the manuscript being submitted. The authors confirm that all bylined authors fulfill all conditions.

Ethical standards

This human study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee, and it has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monia Marturano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paparella, R., Marturano, M., Pelino, L. et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing synthetic vs biological out-in transobturator tape: a mean 3-year follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 21, 1327–1336 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1197-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1197-y

Keywords

Navigation