Abstract
We consider the problem of local (quasi-)geoid modelling from terrestrial gravity anomalies. Whereas this problem is uniquely solvable (up to spherical harmonic degree one) if gravity anomalies are globally available, the problem is non-unique if gravity anomalies are only available within a local area, which is the typical situation in local/regional gravity field modelling. We derive a mathematical description of the kernel of the gravity anomaly operator. The non-uniqueness can be removed using external height anomaly information, e.g., provided by GPS-levelling. The corresponding problem is formulated as a Cauchy problem for the Laplace equation. The existence and uniqueness of the solution of the Cauchy problem is guaranteed by the Cauchy–Kowalevskaya theorem. We propose several numerical procedures to compute the solution of the Cauchy problem from given differences between gravimetric and geometric height anomalies. We apply the numerical techniques to real data over the Netherlands and Germany. We show that we can compute a unique quasi-geoid from observed gravimetric and geometric height anomalies, which agree with the data within the expected noise level. We conclude that observed differences between gravimetric height anomalies and geometric height anomalies derived from GPS and levelling cannot only be attributed to systematic errors in the data sets, but are also caused by the intrinsic non-uniqueness of the problem of local quasi-geoid modelling from gravity anomalies. Hence, GPS-levelling data are necessary to get a unique solution, which also implies that they should not be used to validate local quasi-geoid solutions computed on the basis of gravity anomalies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
de Bruijne AJT, Haagmans RHN, de Min EJ (1997) A preliminary North Sea Geoid model GEONZ97. Rep MDGAP-9735, Directoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaat, Meetkundige Dienst, Delft
Denker H, Torge W (1998) The European Gravimetric Quasigeoid EGG97—An IAG Supported Continental Enterprise. In: Forsberg R, Feissel M, Dietrich R (ed) Geodesy on the move—gravity, geoid, geodynamics and antarctica, IAG Symp vol 119. Springer, Heidelberg pp 249–254
Dinter G, Illner M, Jäger R (1997) A synergetic aproach for the integration of GPS heights into standard height systems and for the quality control and refinement of geoid models. Proc Subcommission for Europe Symposium EUREF, Ankara 1996. In: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed) Veröffentlichungen der Internationalen Erdmessung der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol 57, Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München
Ebenfelt P, Shapiro HS (1995) The Cauchy-Kowalevskaya theorem and generalizations. Commun Partial Diff Equ 20:939–960
Featherstone WE (1998) Do we need a gravimetric geoid or a model of the base of the Australian Height Datum to transform GPS heights?. Aust Surv 43:273–280
Featherstone WE (2000) Refinement of a gravimetric geoid using GPS and levelling data. J Surv Eng 126:27–56
Featherstone WE (2004) Evidence of a north-south trend between AUSGeoid98 and the AHD in southwest Australia. Surv Rev 37: 334–343
Förste C, Flechtner F, Schmidt R, Meyer U, Stubenvoll R, Barthelmes F, König R, Neumayer KH, Rothacher M, Reigber Ch, Biancale R, Bruinsma S, Lemoine J-M, Raimondo JC (2005) A new high resolution global gravity field model derived from combination of GRACE and CHAMP mission and altimetry/gravimetry surface gravity data. Paper presented at EGU General Assembly 2005, Vienna, April. Available as http://www.gfz-potsdam. de/pb1/op/grace/results/grav/g004_EGU05-A-04561.pdf
Fotopoulos G, Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (2003) How accurately can we determine orthometric height differences from GPS and geoid data. J Surv Eng 1:1–10
Fotopoulos G (2005) Calibration of geoid error models via a combined adjustment of ellipsoidal, orthometric and gravimetric geoid height data. J Geod 79:111–123
Grebenitcharsky RS, Rangelova EV, Sideris MG (2005) Transformation between gravimetric and GPS/levelling-derived geoids using additional gravity information. J Geodyn 39:527–544
Hadamard J (1921) Lectures on Cauchy’s problem in linear partial differential equations. Silliman Lectures Series. Yale University Press, New Haven
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco
Ito K (ed) (1980) Harmonic functions and subharmonic functions: invariance of harmonicity. Encyclopedic dictionary of mathematics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 725
Jäger R (1999) State of the art and present developments of a general concept for GPS-based height determination. In: Lilje M (ed) Proc of the symposium geodesy and surveying in the future—the importance of heights, gävle, Sweden, March, Report in Geodesy and Geographical Information Systems, LMV-Rapport 1999(3):161–174
Jäger R (2000) State of the art and present developments of a general concept for GPS-based height determination. In: Proc 1st workshop on GPS and mathematical geodesy in Tanzania, UCLAS, Dar Es Salaam, October 1999
Jäger R, Schneid S (2001) Online and postprocessed GPS-heighting based on the concept of a digital height reference surface (DFHRS). In: Drewes H, Dodson AH, Fortes LPS, Sanchez L, Sandoval P (eds) Vertical reference systems, Cartagena, Colombia, Feb 2001, IAG Symp vol 124. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 203–208
Jost J (2002) Partial differential equations. Springer, New York
Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (1999) On the adjustment of combined GPS/levelling/geoid networks. J Geod 73:412–421
Lavrent’ev MM, Romanov VG, Shishatskii SP (1986) Ill-posed problems of mathematical physics and analysis. American Mathematics Society, Providence
Lysaker DI, Omang OCD, Pettersen BR, Solheim D (2007) Quasigeoid evaluation with improved levelled height data for Norway. J Geod. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-006-0129-6
de Min E (1996) De geoide voor Nederland. Nederlandse Commissie voor Geodesie, Groene serie, vol 34, Delft
Nahavandchi N, Soltanpour A (2006) Improved determination of heights using a conversion surface by combining gravimetric quasi-geoid/geoid and GPS-levelling height differences. Stud Geophys Geod 50:165–180
Pironneau O, Prud’homme C (2001) FreeFEM user manual. http://www.freefem.org
Sacerdote F, Sansò F (1987) New developments of boundary value problems in physical geodesy. In Proc IAG symp, Vancouver, vol 2, pp 369–390
Shewchuk JR (2002) Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation. Comput Geom Theory Appl 22(1–3):21–74
Sjöberg LE (2005) A discussion on the approximations made in the practical implementation of the remove-compute-restore technique in regional geoid modelling. J Geod 78:645–653
Soltanpour A, Nahavandchi H, Featherstone WEE (2006) The use of second-generation wavelets to combine a gravimetric quasigeoid model with GPS-levelling data. J Geod 80(3):82–93, DOI:10.1007/s00190-006-0033-0
Smith WHF, Wessel P (1990) Gridding with continous curvature splines in tension. Geophys 55:293–305
Vanicek P, Castle RO, Balazc EI (1980) Geodetic leveling and its applications. Rev Geophys 18:505–524
Wessel P, Smith WHF (2004) The Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) Technical Reference and Cookbook, Version 4.0. SOEST/NOAA, Univ Hawai’i, Manoa
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Prutkin, I., Klees, R. On the non-uniqueness of local quasi-geoids computed from terrestrial gravity anomalies. J Geod 82, 147–156 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0161-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0161-1